Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Obama's "Certificate of Birth" manufactured?
Blogtownhall ^ | 6/20/08 | Polark

Posted on 06/17/2008 6:00:53 PM PDT by freespirited

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last
To: TribalPrincess2U

Call Ran Rather, he would know.


21 posted on 06/17/2008 6:17:56 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Lower left corner: Rev. 11/01 laser

What does that mean?


22 posted on 06/17/2008 6:17:59 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

A non-story. Many states do not issue certified photocopies of the original certificate, but generate new legally valid documents when a request is filed.

New York, for instance, does this, and evidently Hawaii does, as well.


23 posted on 06/17/2008 6:17:59 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Nonsense. These are merely certifications that a REAL DOCUMENT is on file somewhere in Hawaii where they keep the birth records.

That's what's done in every state and territory.

Nothing new here ~ just some pale imitations trying to do a Dan Rather deal.

Remember, at some point we had 22 different major documentable claims about the Dan Rather forgeries and I was able to rationally dispose of 21 of them. The only one that passed and couldn't be rejected for objective reasons was "kerning". It was pretty obvious that the photocomposition guy who did the job left "kerning" in the on position when he set up his Microsoft Word commands.

"kerning" didn't happen in the world of typewriters back when "W" was in the Air Force.

Frankly, I doubt the puke is human but none of you guys want to do the hard work to prove that, and so far all your work on certificates like this is demonstrating nothing other than the fact that WP programs are used to set up digital document print formats, which is hardly news.

24 posted on 06/17/2008 6:18:05 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I wondered about that myself. When I saw the “certification” I thought it looked fake but thought I was reaching.
Good I am not the only one.


25 posted on 06/17/2008 6:19:40 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

Plus everything’s in uppercase except DATES.


26 posted on 06/17/2008 6:20:50 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
My suspicion is that his religion was listed as Muslim on his birth certificate. I was born in the 50’s and my birth certificate says Christian on it. He has already lied that he was never a Muslim so he can't produce an original as it would expose him as a liar.
27 posted on 06/17/2008 6:21:55 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Is there someone on FR living in Hawaii who was born in Hawaii the same year as Obama, so they can send a copy of their legitimate birth certificate to show what a real one is supposed to look like?


28 posted on 06/17/2008 6:23:40 PM PDT by Twinkie (TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Is that, in fact, the way the Aloha State responds when someone asks for a certified copy of their birth certificate, with a computer-generated copy? Perhaps. Perhaps not.

As was said above, some Honolulu Freeper born around '61 should ask for a copy of his/her birth certificate and see what happens.

29 posted on 06/17/2008 6:23:50 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark

“Lower left corner: Rev. 11/01 laser

What does that mean?”

Revised, perhaps? Just seven years ago?


30 posted on 06/17/2008 6:24:31 PM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

This is not definitive, because it’s likely that Hawaii issues computer-printed birth certificates these days.

But it reminds me of the way Jean Kerri released/but didn’t release his Form 180. He gave it to a couple of trusted friends, and they released only those parts that were favorable but suppressed the nasty details. He never did actually release his Form 180 in the sense of giving permission for investigators to get it directly from the archives.

The same problem here. IF OBAMA HAS A LEGITIMATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, why won’t he give permission for legitimate investigators to go directly to the State of Hawaii and ask them for a copy, instead of releasing a digital picture of it on a biased and generally unreliable web site?

Release the Form 180. Release the birth certificate.


31 posted on 06/17/2008 6:25:20 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; freespirited; BIGLOOK

They did; we had another big thread on this a few days ago and a number of freepers showed their BCs.

Try to find the thread.


32 posted on 06/17/2008 6:25:53 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freespirited; jimrob; txflake; Just A Nobody; WalterSkinner; Lancey Howard; BossLady

The plot thickens......


33 posted on 06/17/2008 6:27:51 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burkean
Really,
taking into consideration that Obama is now the definite candidate for the Democrats, I am severely limited in the amount of seriousness I invest in all these accusations.

I doubt that Obama would allow his birth certificate to be in public circulation, especially if it was so questionable.
If he's as tricky as people are making him out to be, how could he slip up?

34 posted on 06/17/2008 6:27:58 PM PDT by milkhotel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Obama has (like everything else), probably forged these documents. The evidence seems damning to me also, let us just hope to god that Obama doesn't win.
35 posted on 06/17/2008 6:27:59 PM PDT by milkhotel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
My suspicion is that his religion was listed as Muslim on his birth certificate.

Now THAT is a very interesting comment. Back in those days, people called a spade a spade and that sort of information was commonly included in public documents. A modern, computer-generated birth certificate may be perfectly legitimate, but the format of the output would likely NOT include such information. We now live in a PC world.

If that's the case, I can certainly see why Obama would rather release this version of his certificate rather than something closer to the original.

36 posted on 06/17/2008 6:30:02 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I found it odd that his fathers race was listed as AFRICAN? His mother’s race is listed as CAUCASIAN. Is African something a modern person chose rather than the currently unPC negro?


37 posted on 06/17/2008 6:30:22 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

An earlier thread noted that the State of Hawaii will alter a birth certificate whenever ordered to do so by a court, and will hide the original.

So all Obama would have to do to change it—for instance, to change the name on it, or even the date of birth—would be to get a court order. Or possibly the original used the term “negro,” which was commonly used at the time, but that was then changed to “African.”

After these changes are made, and there could have been several over the years, you get a computer printout of the new information, and the original certificate—if it still exists at all—is locked away somewhere and unavailable. Probably the original paper certificates have been photocopied or microfilmed or digitized into a computer, and then destroyed.


38 posted on 06/17/2008 6:30:33 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

He is saying it is not a official document that had the pertinent Obama info added, then printed. Read his analysis carefully.


39 posted on 06/17/2008 6:31:29 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
It's interesting that the person who wrote this analysis ignored the reverse datestamp on the document.

-PJ

40 posted on 06/17/2008 6:36:05 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson