Skip to comments.
Junk Science Week: The pesticide report everyone ignored [The pesticide report that nobody read]
Financial Post vua National Post ^
| 2008-06-16
| Terence Corcoran
Posted on 06/16/2008 6:47:04 PM PDT by Clive
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
06/16/2008 6:47:33 PM PDT
by
Clive
To: Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
2
posted on
06/16/2008 6:48:21 PM PDT
by
Clive
To: Clive
Like DDT - except for the little problem of 8 million dead from malaria...
3
posted on
06/16/2008 6:56:30 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
To: Clive
4
posted on
06/16/2008 6:57:21 PM PDT
by
dmcnash
(Do you recognize my voice, Mandrake?)
To: Clive

I love the smell of 2,4,D in the morning.
5
posted on
06/16/2008 7:07:16 PM PDT
by
Barnacle
(Communists and Jihadists were at odds...Then came Barack.)
To: Barnacle
I love the smell of 2,4,D in the morning. I do too. If it's a good hot day, the weeds are dead by evening.
6
posted on
06/16/2008 7:14:01 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(OVERPRODUCTION......... one of the top five worries for American farmers.)
To: Barnacle
The pesticide report that nobody readJobs Americans won't do.
Cool pic. After Duvall, that film went downhill, fast.
7
posted on
06/16/2008 7:17:21 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Clive
8
posted on
06/16/2008 7:20:00 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Clive
One day they will admit the same thing about PCBs.
9
posted on
06/16/2008 7:23:12 PM PDT
by
Hacklehead
(Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
To: Clive
Its easy to generate a junk science scare. You make stuff up, exaggerate the risks, politicize the subject and spin it into a corporate and ideological battle. And, above all, you ignore the facts. Global Warming fits that bill.
10
posted on
06/16/2008 7:24:32 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: Clive
Junk science has two advantages over the real one - 1) big and, most importantly, easy money and 2) mass hysteria, ever so pleasing to the “scientists” du jour.
11
posted on
06/16/2008 7:29:16 PM PDT
by
alecqss
To: onedoug
After Duvall, that film went downhill, fast. Each time I see it, I like it more.
Duvall sure has had a great career. Have you seen Second Hand Lions?
12
posted on
06/16/2008 7:41:53 PM PDT
by
Barnacle
(Communists and Jihadists were at odds...Then came Barack.)
To: xcamel
Well that’s OK, gets rid of overpopulation.
To: Clive
Dr. Arya trotted out the same old arguments his group has been using for years. He began with the usual catch-all scaremonger cop-out, accusing Health Canada of saying that a hazardous substance was safe. Science cannot say 2,4-D, or any other toxic chemical designed to kill a biological organism, is safe. Using that logic we can use no pesticide, no herbicide, no fungicide, no anti-biotic and no rat poison.
That takes us back to the dark ages and the days of the great plagues.
The days when famines were a common scourge of humanity. When fully a third or more of every years crop was eaten by insects.
Maybe these purveyors of panic like the idea of going hungry on a daily basis but I do not.
If these eviro-crazies want to freeze in the dark and sleep in a swarm of mosquitoes with a rat chewing on their toes they can feel free, but leave me and the rest of modern man alone with our chemicals.
14
posted on
06/16/2008 8:08:35 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Pontiac
Maybe these purveyors of panic like the idea of going hungry on a daily basis
NO, no, no, you don’t get it, they like the idea of YOU going hungry. They are the only ones who care about the Earth and they deserve to live.
15
posted on
06/16/2008 8:14:13 PM PDT
by
tiki
(True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
To: tiki
they like the idea of YOU going hungry. They are the only ones who care about the Earth and they deserve to live. Your probably right about that.
But insect bourn diseases dont play favorites. The plagues of the middle ages were not players of favorites. The plagues killed rich and poor, king and commoner alike.
These people are fools.
They play with fire and will burn the whole world down if too many people listen to them.
16
posted on
06/16/2008 8:22:17 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Clive
Science cannot say 2,4-D, or any other toxic chemical designed to kill a biological organism, is safe.
Even dihydrous oxide (AKA dihydrogen monoxide, or hydroxl acid) is toxic if used improperly. Actually, it kills several hundred thousands of people world wide every year. And yet, no national health organization has banned it!
To: Pontiac
They are playing with fire, but they are too stupid to know.
18
posted on
06/16/2008 8:55:27 PM PDT
by
tiki
(True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
To: Clive
19
posted on
06/16/2008 9:43:58 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
To: Clive
Great story. I once had a seasonal job at a fertilizer plant where one of my duties was adding a liquid called Killex (active ingredient 2,4-D) to bags of weed killer. Yes, really. It was almost 30 years ago, and no I haven’t got cancer or anything similar.
20
posted on
06/16/2008 10:25:05 PM PDT
by
TheMole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson