Posted on 06/15/2008 12:16:25 PM PDT by Red Steel
Thanks very much for posting. Interesting.
Except they're missing one thing...The opportunity to kill Christians and Jews and our Soldiers.
I love how they slipped in the lies about the hellish conditions at Gitmo.
The Boumediene v. Bush decision was a power grab by five justices or more specifically by Kennedy. The Constitution created three branches and it did not make the court supreme to the other two branches. Article III Section 2 second paragraph; establishes that the supreme Court shall have Jurisdiction “with such Exceptions and under such Regulations as Congress shall make.” The Military Commissions act explicitly stated that the military tribunals were constitutional and the courts to which enemy combatants had access. The Supreme Court has declared that they believe the courts are supreme to congress and entitled to makeup the rules for how to judge enemy combatants, then apply the rules that they make up, and order the other branches of government and the citizens to obey the judicial tyrants. If Congress were interested in anything other than playing politics, like asserting their constitutional authority to write the rules that the courts apply, then Congress would attempt to maintain the balance of power necessary for our Republic.
Pretty soon you will see General “Midnight Jogger” Souter telling the 101st Airborne where they may place their drop zones.
Yep. I think it was Rush that said some of the detainees at Gitmo have gained weight.
Kennedy is well known in taking legal decision based on international laws first and then on the Constitution.
::::::
His “teachings” show him to be the liberal hypocrite that he is. The leftist justices on the SCOTUS just cannot separate their PERSONAL POLITICS from the job of UPHOLDING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AS WRITTEN.
Yep. I think it was Rush that said some of the detainees at Gitmo have gained weight.
There, fix it.
Kennedy has gone looney tunes.
Yet, the food and air conditioning at the jail in Guantanamo would still be superior.
Eurotrash are such suckers.
It would be so much better if he would based his opinions on the US Constitution.
When the Caliphate is established the first ones on the chopping block will be the Supremes....
What law firm was behind Boumediene and what law firm and what individuals plead the case before the Supreme Court?
Kennedy will be remembered for being the deciding vote in one of the worst decisions ever from the Supreme Court on Guantanamo prisioners coming into civilian courts.
What burden does this place on the government? The government must merely demonstrate that there is a legitimate and lawful reason for holding these prisonsers prisoner. It would require for instance military officers stating under oath that said gentleman was captured bearing arms on the battlefield and is an enemy POW.
The reason that this is an important right in the war on terror is that many of the folks in Guantanimo were captured elsewhere. They may be illegal combatants. They may also be someone who was caught on the wrong airplane at the wrong time and has never had the opportunity to make his case. Until a neutral judge hears that, with a record of fact that is appealable, you don't know.
I understand the exigencies of war, but the guys at Guantanimo are hors de combat, thousands of miles from any front, and processing them through the legal system is hardly a legal strain on US government resources (most of which is standing around doing not very much anyway).
Me, I am awfully jealous of constitutional protections against arbitrary executive authority. I would not give up habeas corpus lightly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.