Skip to comments.
Top GOP fundraiser signals fight for seats
The Washington Times ^
| 6/13/08
| Ralph Z. Hallow
Posted on 06/13/2008 9:03:44 AM PDT by Dawnsblood
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Bold is mine.
To: Dawnsblood
2
posted on
06/13/2008 9:06:24 AM PDT
by
Prokopton
To: Dawnsblood
3
posted on
06/13/2008 9:12:23 AM PDT
by
fetal heart beats by 21st day
(Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
To: Dawnsblood
a decline that he said was not the result of small donors being disgusted with excessive Republican spending in Congress but of the party having been mailing "bad" lists
denial is the most predictable of all human response
4
posted on
06/13/2008 9:13:22 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: Dawnsblood
>> “a decline that he said was not the result of small donors being disgusted with excessive Republican spending in Congress but of the party having been mailing “bad” lists that had driven up fundraising costs.”
I guess all the disgusted Republicans are on the “bad” list.
5
posted on
06/13/2008 9:14:46 AM PDT
by
Gene Eric
To: bill1952
>> denial is the most predictable of all human response
I was thinking that too, but then the word ‘deception’ came to mind.
6
posted on
06/13/2008 9:17:58 AM PDT
by
Gene Eric
To: Prokopton
I will not give a dime to the turncoat McShamesty. He mocks all I stand for in the USA. I stand for strong borders, low taxes, anti liberal judges, energy independence, etc. He stands for cap and trade, open borders, blocking conservative judges, no drilling for our own oil, etc. The RNC made it clear by using winner takes all primary in ultra liberal states that an ultra liberal “republican “ would win.
7
posted on
06/13/2008 9:20:58 AM PDT
by
bronxboy
To: Dawnsblood
Got a call yesterday. The fundraiser said the party needed funds to get the truth out about Obama, said nothing about McCain. I told him two things: first, a lot of sources were getting out the truth about Obama, and second, if and when McCain showed his loyalty to conservatives I would consider making a contribution, but not until then. In the meantime McCain could continue to rely on his RINO friends to fund his campaign. The fundraiser kept trying to focus on Obama and I hung up on him. Sounds like they aren’t getting traction selling McCain.
8
posted on
06/13/2008 9:21:27 AM PDT
by
caseinpoint
(Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
To: Dawnsblood
I haven't given the national RNC a dime since 2000. I'm an individual candidates guy only at this point.
The RNC is not to be trusted.
However, it is imperative that we give to congressional conservatives whenever possible.
9
posted on
06/13/2008 9:21:59 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Every second spent bashing McCain is time that could be spent helping Conservatives downticket.)
To: Gene Eric
"...party having been mailing bad lists that had driven up fundraising costs. They did not discover the bad list until they tried contacting their base.
10
posted on
06/13/2008 9:24:21 AM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Dawnsblood
He maintained the party's contributor base is intact.
Well I do have an unexplained $250 charge on my credit card I'm trying to track down.
11
posted on
06/13/2008 9:27:06 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I miss the days when only the politicians were unethical.)
To: Antoninus
Same here. I’m re-registering as Independent at this point.
And in campaigning, I don’t want to hear about you talking about why the other guy is bad. I want to hear you talking about what you bring to the table that is good. My vote doesn’t go to who gives the best smack talk.
12
posted on
06/13/2008 9:45:06 AM PDT
by
WarToad
To: Dawnsblood
If the GOP would grab the energy independence issue (i.e., drill now, drill here, build refineries & nukes) and make it their own, they would get plenty of dollars and may even make some gains in the senate and house.
13
posted on
06/13/2008 9:46:30 AM PDT
by
Mogollon
(Vote straight GOP for congress....our only protection against Obama, or McCain.)
To: Red_Devil 232
The "bad lists" are the result of its failure to indicate that donors were pretty upset at the Bush-Kennedy-McCain "comprensive" shamnesty bill a couple of years ago.
Heck, the only acknowledgment that they made was the elimination of the in-house fund raisers.
That's it. Blame the disgruntled fund raisers. If they knew people were upset about the rewarding lawbreakers, I'm sure they would have suggested to Bush it wasn't a good idea, and made sure McCain was left to his own resources at the beginning of his candidacy.
To: Calvin Locke
Dang it. “comprehensive”.
To: WarToad
Same here. Im re-registering as Independent at this point.
I'm joining the FALCON Party in November. I am voting for McCain - not happy with the choice but voting for any others is a vote for Hussien!!
16
posted on
06/13/2008 10:14:26 AM PDT
by
EagleandLiberty
(El Rushbo Tribal name -- RinoHunter Coming Soon - a new CONSERVATIVE PARTY --- www.falconparty.com)
To: Dawnsblood
I’ve given 5k to Ensign’s RNSC group.
It is essential to hold 41 seats in the senate.
I’ve also given 2300 to McCain.
I will be giving more to other “rinos” this year.
I’m smart, have a lot of money saved, healthy, adapatable, creative and well educated. I will do fine no matter what happens in November.
As to the rest of you, if Obama wins and has 60 seats in the senate, those of you who are less fortunate will be in dire straits.
17
posted on
06/13/2008 10:30:06 AM PDT
by
staytrue
To: staytrue
Im smart, have a lot of money saved, healthy, adapatable, creative and well educated. I will do fine no matter what happens in November.
I'm not too sure if I would agree with the first part of your self-assesment.
18
posted on
06/13/2008 10:49:28 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: Red_Devil 232
>> They did not discover the bad list until they tried contacting their base.
exactly.
"a decline ... was not the result of ... excessive Republican spending ..."
I think the Republicans need a comprehension plan.
To: Antoninus
The RNC is not to be trusted.
However, it is imperative that we give to congressional conservatives whenever possible.BUMP! Ditto.
20
posted on
06/13/2008 1:51:14 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson