Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/13/2008 4:42:41 AM PDT by Invisigoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Invisigoth

Well, they elect their representatives....


2 posted on 06/13/2008 4:44:33 AM PDT by JaneNC (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

Is it taking freedom away from smokers, or giving freedom back to property-owners?


3 posted on 06/13/2008 4:45:22 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Drill! Drill!! Drill!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...

Nanny state PING.......

What a waste of time and taxpayer money. It seems to me that landlords would already be able to do something like this.

While I would never rent such an apartment, I do support the right of the landlord to prohibit smoking, it is his property.


8 posted on 06/13/2008 5:26:22 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

“...the legislature now wants to make it permissible for a landlord to prevent smoking in apartment buildings...”

This just goes to show that the ruling class thinks that they provide the little people rights. Our founders would have revolted long ago.


19 posted on 06/13/2008 6:35:24 AM PDT by CSM (Hey if a small tax increase didn't work, a bigger tax increase should not work even BETTER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson