Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Invisigoth; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...

Nanny state PING.......

What a waste of time and taxpayer money. It seems to me that landlords would already be able to do something like this.

While I would never rent such an apartment, I do support the right of the landlord to prohibit smoking, it is his property.


8 posted on 06/13/2008 5:26:22 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
What a waste of time and taxpayer money. It seems to me that landlords would already be able to do something like this.

It's just an attempt to pander to the anti-smoking crowd and condition everyone else to accept further restrictions in the future.

As others have said, I doubt the legislators behind this bill give a rat's rear about property rights.

15 posted on 06/13/2008 5:54:36 AM PDT by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

I don’t know why they had the legislature jump in either. Must never have heard of that “lease” thingy and how you could write terms and conditions into them, eh?


18 posted on 06/13/2008 6:26:28 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

Thanks for the ping!


28 posted on 06/13/2008 7:39:45 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson