To: mnehrling
I love how he votes against it all, despite dutifully passing on the requests from constituents. Eat your heart out RINOs!
3 posted on
06/12/2008 7:57:48 PM PDT by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
His votes are symbolic.
Putting the pork in the bill in the first place is substance.
Symbolism
Substance
Your choice..
I’ve posted our other represenatives earmark requests at the same time, I’m sure you’ll want to go make some excuses for them as well..
4 posted on
06/12/2008 8:02:56 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: Gondring
If it is his “duty” to pass on requests from his constituents, then it is also his “duty” to make sure they pass as that too represents the will of his constituents.
In other words, you can’t have it both ways. You can’t claim to be against earmarks while taking direct action you know will create earmarks.
Plus, as already stated, he votes “no” knowing full well his district will get the money anyway, which makes it a charade of the highest caliber.
To: Gondring; All
So basically you finally admit RP is a shyster, not fully representing his constituents, as is his job under the Constitution he loves to pretend to be expert on, while gladly taking their money and support, as he will from anyone who can fog a mirror...
Well that's a little progress...
7 posted on
06/12/2008 8:34:13 PM PDT by
ejonesie22
(Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery.)
To: Gondring
I was going to reply on this thread, but there's no reasoning with those who think paleoconservatives are worse than dems. And beleive me, there are some who hate Ron Paul as much as they hate the Clintons.
They'll deny it, but it's true.
20 posted on
06/13/2008 7:28:59 AM PDT by
mysterio
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson