Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Honda FCX Clarity and Home Hydrogen Fueling Stations
greencar.com ^ | 6-2008 | Bill Siuru

Posted on 06/12/2008 6:34:42 PM PDT by doug from upland

Honda FCX Clarity and Home Hydrogen Fueling Stations

By Bill Siuru

Honda’s decision to transition its FCX Clarity into limited production and lease some 50 of these hydrogen fuel cell cars to customers in Southern California is a groundbreaking move. Why Southern California? A small number of very expensive hydrogen fueling stations already exist here and more are in the planning stages. In tandem with this, Honda has also shown a longer term solution for refueling hydrogen vehicles in the form of its fourth generation Home Energy Station. Working with its technology partner Plug Power, Honda debuted the first Home Energy Station in 2003, followed by improved and more compact HES II and III versions in the years that followed.

The Home Energy Station is a self-contained unit that not only supplies the high purity hydrogen required for a fuel cell vehicle, but through co-generation also heats a home, provides hot water, and produces electricity. Its energy feedstock is the natural gas that’s already supplied to most U.S. homes. In operation, a fuel processor uses steam reformation to convert natural gas to hydrogen gas. Then, after purification and compression to a higher pressure to allow more compact storage, the hydrogen is stored in tanks and available for refueling a hydrogen vehicle’s 5,000 psi on-board storage cylinders.

The HES also has its own fuel cell that uses hydrogen to produce electricity for the home. An inverter converts this fuel cell’s DC output to standard 120 volt AC household electrical power. Waste heat from the fuel cell is used for home and water heating. The latest HES IV version is about 70 percent smaller than the first HES design, making it more suitable for household installation. Size reduction was achieved by combining the unit’s gas purification and power generation components. This also increased overall efficiency while making it easier to switch from hydrogen production to power generation as needed.

Don’t expect to see the HES on the market soon. Honda says it’s unlikely to be ready for home use before the middle of the next decade at the earliest. However, Honda is already proving out its HES IV at the Honda R&D Americas facility in Torrance, Calif. and other demonstrations are likely.

Is this the ultimate enabler for environmental vehicles? At present the HES IV does use fossil fuel since it operates on natural gas, although this is one fuel that’s found in abundance in the U.S. and North America. Also, it produces carbon dioxide and nitrogen emissions. Still, Honda's Stephen Ellis shares that using this system to generate hydrogen and fuel an FCX Clarity can reduce total well-to-wheel CO2 emissions by 60 percent compared to an equivalent gasoline-fueled car. Overall, the HES IV can reduce CO2 emissions by an estimated 30 percent and energy costs by an estimated 50 percent compared to the average U.S. home with grid-supplied electricity and a gasoline-powered car.

Separately, Honda is developing solar-powered hydrogen refueling stations that would use no fossil fuels or produce any CO2 gases, or any other emissions for that matter. Honda is now operating an experimental solar-powered hydrogen station at its facility in Torrance. The station uses Honda's water electrolyzing module to produce hydrogen using next-generation thin film solar cells developed by Honda Engineering. The thin film, made from a compound of copper, indium, gallium, and selenium, allows production of high pressure hydrogen at 52 to 66 percent efficiency.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; autoshop; energy; gasoline; honda; hydrogen; oil; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: JSteff
There is no carbon free way to power this earth yet.

Nuclear fission.

21 posted on 06/12/2008 8:49:00 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (Election 2008 - American Idol except no one can sing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Starwolf
“Consider this...the utilities utilize the spining reserve to generate H2 at night. It would not be free energy, but more a recovery of wasted energy.”

Couldn't that make Hydrogen as a bi-product of making nuclear power? That would make nuclear and hydrogen a natural? Power for the cars and nuclear power make electricity for our homes.

22 posted on 06/12/2008 9:10:57 PM PDT by JSteff (This election is about the 3 to 5 supremes who will retire in the next 8 years, vote accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Starwolf

Hydrogen does not and never will make economic sense, other than in the most exotic applications. Yhe space shuttle is the best current example, because MASS energy density is the critical measure. However, the space shuttle can pay the price of carrying LIQUID hydrogen, with a density far exceeding the extremely costly, bulky, and clumsy 5000- or 10,000-psi gaseous hydrogen tanks. But like the nuclear powered carrier or submarine, it just cannot be scaled down to less than gigantic size.

But that tank of liquid hydrogen actually holds less than 2/3 the hydrogen present in the same volume of gasoline - and barely over 1/4 the energy content! So hydrogen is a boondoggle, and so is ethanol, which has only 2/3 the energy content of gasoline. Butanol - from biological sources - is a far better alternative.

Transportation - gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel - account for over 2/3 of our petroleum consumption. And more than 95% of these products are made from petroleum. These light liquid hydrocarbons (LLH) that are the transportations fuels of today will serve the same role for many decades in the future. The only change will be the raw materials from which they are made.

“Found” petroleum is valuable because of its energy content. What you put in your tank contains about 85% of the energy content of what came out of the well. Non-petroleum sources will require added energy to assemble those large hydrocarbon molecules from more elemental sources of carbon - perhaps from CO2, waste products, coal, or other sources - and hydrogen, probably from brackish or partially treated waste water.

Right now I THINK that bioengineered bugs - bacteria or algae - will be the major new source, probably grown in transparent tank farms in sunny climates near industrial CO2 sources.


23 posted on 06/12/2008 9:16:42 PM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
Nuclear fission.

The most logical answer to the "energy crisis".
24 posted on 06/12/2008 9:18:27 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Funny that no one mentions:

Your insurance company won't let you put your H2 powered car in a garage. Neither will the car company.

Liquid H2 requires about 10% boil-off every 24 hours.

The world's leakiest substance and 5,000 psi don't mix.

25 posted on 06/12/2008 9:48:43 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Would Muslims find this car an already explosive device that they can use as a terrorist weapon?


26 posted on 06/12/2008 10:17:25 PM PDT by Eye of Unk (The world WILL be cleaner, safer and more productive without Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
Yes but the greenies and dems will not even allow that.
27 posted on 06/12/2008 10:27:29 PM PDT by JSteff (This election is about the 3 to 5 supremes who will retire in the next 8 years, vote accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Sign me up!


28 posted on 06/13/2008 4:53:43 AM PDT by mr_hammer (Checking the breeze and barking at things that go bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
“Nuclear fission.”

That was only fiction in “Back to the Future”. Nukes don't fit in cars yet, so for now we are stuck primarily with carbon emitting sources of power.

29 posted on 06/14/2008 10:05:02 PM PDT by JSteff (This election is about the 3 to 5 supremes who will retire in the next 8 years, vote accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JSteff

You statement said “...power this earth.” I figured you meant what you said. My bad.


30 posted on 06/14/2008 10:18:59 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (Election 2008 - American Idol except no one can sing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

YEAH, BUT THIS CAR SPITS OUT WATER. THE ENVIRONMENTALISTS ARE GOING TO COMPLAIN THAT ONCE THIS CAR GOES INTO PRODUCTION THE WORLD’S OCEAN LEVELS ARE GOING TO RISE.


31 posted on 06/16/2008 2:35:32 PM PDT by seawolf101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson