Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE 1-McCain wants low corporate taxes, regulated CEO pay
Reuters ^ | Tue Jun 10, 2008 | Jeff Mason

Posted on 06/10/2008 5:17:40 AM PDT by BloodOrFreedom

Republican White House candidate John McCain will promise on Tuesday to lower corporate tax rates if he wins the U.S. presidency and ease the tax burden on middle-class workers to help revive the faltering economy.

The Arizona senator, who has wrapped up his party's presidential nomination, also would propose a simpler, alternative tax system and insist that chief executives' pay and severance packages have shareholder approval.

"No matter which of us wins in November, there will be change in Washington. The question is what kind of change?" McCain will tell a conference for small businesses, referring to his Democratic opponent, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.

"Will we enact the single largest tax increase since the Second World War as my opponent proposes, or will we keep taxes low for families and employers?" he will say, according to excerpts released before his speech.

McCain will pledge to act quickly to lower corporate taxes from "the second highest in the world to one on par with our trading partners to keep businesses and jobs in this country."

He will propose a law to allow companies to expense new equipment and technology in their first year.

He supports keeping capital gains taxes low, doubling a tax exemption for children, and phasing out the "alternative minimum tax" which he said would save some 25 million middle-class families up to $2,000 in a year.

On Monday Obama drew a sharp contrast with McCain, his opponent in the November election, accusing him of wanting to widen President George W. Bush's tax cuts and plunge the United States deeper into debt.

He charged that McCain's support for extending Bush's tax cuts would allow $2 trillion in corporate tax breaks.

U.S. taxes were too complicated overhaul, McCain will say in his speech, in which he will argue for an alternative system.

"As president, I will propose an alternative tax system. When this reform is enacted, all who wish to file under the current system could still do so," he will say.

"Everyone else could choose a vastly less complicated system with two tax rates and a generous standard deduction."

McCain criticizes Obama for wanting to increase dividend and capital gains taxes and aiming to raise the minimum wage and link it to an index.

But he also takes aim at top corporate executives with big salaries and excessive severance packages.

"Americans are right to be offended when the extravagant salaries and severance deals of CEOs ... bear no relation to the success of the company or the wishes of shareholders," he will say, adding that some of those chief executives helped bring on the country's housing crisis and market troubles.

"If I am elected president, I intend to see that wrongdoing of this kind is called to account by federal prosecutors. And under my reforms, all aspects of a CEO's pay, including any severance arrangements, must be approved by shareholders," he will say. (Editing by Chris Wilson


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: ceopay; justsayno2johnmccain; mccain; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-306 next last
To: BloodOrFreedom
Well I certainly think many CEO of companies owned by shareholders make obscene salaries far beyond their true worth for the job they do. The shareholders are stupid for permitting such conditions to exist. It should be the shareholders responsibility to rein in the CEO’s insane paycheck and not da gubermunts.
161 posted on 06/10/2008 3:05:17 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Three Blind Rats. Three Blind Rats, See How They Run. See How They Run. Hillbomacain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Whatever in the world gave you the impression that corporate world is a democracy, or that it should be ?

The reason why people are hired to be leaders of corporations is because they’re capable and know what the hell they’re doing. Not everyone has what it takes to be one and not everyone can be an entrepreneur. There are notable exceptions of corruption or gross incompetence, but by and large folks who are in charge are highly skilled and talented business folks, otherwise companies would be out of business.


162 posted on 06/10/2008 3:23:48 PM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

The opposition is to the idea that it is mandated. What business of governtment is that ? If shareholders object, they should elect the board and fire everyone. Otherwise, thanks for playing.


163 posted on 06/10/2008 3:26:17 PM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Contracts are negotiated IN ADVANCE. Why is that so hard to grasp ? People get those payouts because that’s what they were worth when they signed on. And the boards, which are controlled by shareholders, approve those kinds of things.

Shareholders control the boards. Plain and simple.


164 posted on 06/10/2008 3:29:03 PM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

LOL... exactly !!!! AAAAAGH !!! -— Now let’s get busy working on electing a CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY in Congress -— that is the only way we will kepp the next President in CHECK !!!


165 posted on 06/10/2008 3:29:45 PM PDT by davidosborne (http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s) to elect Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: dalereed; calcowgirl
"It’s worse than that."

I have no doubt and judging by your example further confirms my certitude!!!

I wrote such a big "rant" because I see so much of this phony "fairness" creeping into the heart of conservatism right here on FR!!! It's HOGWASH!!!

And everybody that's actually conservative with traditional American thinking and education understands that! The rest around here are so screwed up by government schools and public indoctrination, etc. that they can't even think straight anymore!!!

It's almost getting discouraging to see the pussy thinking from this infectious altruism and other fuzzy thinking!!!

166 posted on 06/10/2008 3:30:48 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Liberalism's prime directives are: taxation, regulation, litigation, legislation, agravation, etc..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: All

I’d love to know who is advising McCain. Did someone come up with this nonsense for him or did he dream it up himself?
If he came up with it himself, is there not one conservative on his staff who could inform him that what he proposes is illegal?


167 posted on 06/10/2008 3:33:06 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: farlander

“Shareholders control the Boards”

Really? When was the last loser CEO ejected by the Board sans shareholder funded Golden Parachute?

And at the very least, if those contracts are “Signed in Advance” then the shareholders could veto the agreement before it is signed.


168 posted on 06/10/2008 3:34:17 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ The Obamao v Mad Jon, win the battle and lose the war..choice of evils be..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Mark-in-Kentucky
I don't know you Mark, but I realy like you.


May God bless us all, we are going to need it.


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE


It's too bad ignorance isn't painful.

169 posted on 06/10/2008 3:36:45 PM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: BloodOrFreedom

This article is just further evidence of what I have believed for a long time. There is not a dime’s worth of difference between McCain and Obama.

Both of them believe in the power of the almighty federal government to regulate our lives they only disagree on the details.

If you go down the list of issues on their campaign sites you’ll see that there is very little fundamental differences: they both love the IRS, they both are interventionists, they are both for appeasing illegals, they are both believers in global warming, they both believe the gov’t needs to do something about health care, they both believe the federal gov’t has a role in our children’s education, etc. Sure the squabble over the details but in the end their core beliefs are still the same - they are both globalists and they are both statists.

My only hope for the GOP is that somehow, someway McCain does not walk out of the convention as the nominee, but the chances of that are miniscule.


170 posted on 06/10/2008 3:37:07 PM PDT by PastorTony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Some companies are moving to this kind of a system without governmental prodding. Since I look at the pay packages these guys get, and the fact that they are usually incompetent, it says to me that the current system is not working. I don’t see why that should not be changed.

I always prefer incentive based pay with set preconditions. I have zero problem with some CEO getting a huge bonus if the numbers he has generated indicate that he has done good work.

I think anyone would look sideways at a CEO that gets a 10 mill bonus in the quarter his company files for bankruptcy protection.

If we move to a "do this, get this bonus"..."do this, get this bonus" I think that will help.

But you have to be careful. Sometimes a company has to pay a big CEO salary because they are in trouble and need an immediate star player and a big payoff up front is the only way to attract someone to a situation that will be risky to their rep and future earnings prospects.


171 posted on 06/10/2008 3:37:22 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: BloodOrFreedom

Yep, he’s really that stupid.


172 posted on 06/10/2008 3:44:48 PM PDT by thelastvirgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Well I certainly think many CEO of companies owned by shareholders make obscene salaries far beyond their true worth for the job they do. The shareholders are stupid for permitting such conditions to exist. It should be the shareholders responsibility to rein in the CEO’s insane paycheck and not da gubermunts.

Trouble is that its not the government's place...and shareholders are not mom and pop getting a regular dividend check. Shareholders are big funds, day traders, or computers. They don't give a flip about what the company does or how its run as long as the price goes up next week so they can sell and get a payoff.

So essentially corporate management is left to do whatever.

You have some activist investors, but even they are not there for the long-term health of the company. They are there to advocate selling some stuff or laying off some folks to bump the share price in the short run so they can sell and make cash.

I am not sure what should be done about it. There doesn't seem to be a good answer. But its not that healthy for the country as it is now. We were better off when we had longer term investors who actually took an interest in the long term health and growth of the company they invested in.
173 posted on 06/10/2008 3:44:59 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
" ... You have to understand how McCain works ..."


I've seen how McLame works, and I have made my decision.


In fact I recently recived a letter from the McLost campaign which requested funds.

I returned it it the pre paid envelope with the cute black McCain in 2008 (black & white) cut in half, including all the pages of crap that they sent. (including my name & address)


Screw that blovating, RHINO, POS.

174 posted on 06/10/2008 3:47:27 PM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

“Screw John McCain”

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!


175 posted on 06/10/2008 3:49:47 PM PDT by thelastvirgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BloodOrFreedom

It’ll be interesting watching the McCainiacs’ perpetual contortions trying to make their support keep pace with his gaffes and incredibly dumb ideas....and how he refuses to directly engage with Obama on matters of race and culture. He’s a loser.


176 posted on 06/10/2008 3:59:46 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Leaving the top of my ballot blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Why stop at CEO’s? How about professional athletes, rock stars and movie stars?

If a rock star or hollywood actress suck they don't get a multi million golden parachute. They are relugated to playing at a Holidy Inn bar on Friday nights or have to do informercials for Tempurpedic to earn a living.

This is good legislation.

177 posted on 06/10/2008 4:01:56 PM PDT by am452 (In order to ensure the quality of your patriotism, your conversation may be monitored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: am452

No it isn’t. Executive pay is the decision of the board of directors, not the shareholders....or the legislative body. If shareholders are unhappy with executive compensation or performance they can elect a new slate of board members. That’s how it works, except for people like McCain who are panderers and know little about how business and free markets work.


178 posted on 06/10/2008 4:05:42 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Leaving the top of my ballot blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

http://www.angelfire.com/biz4/davidosborne/RNCletter_no_funds.pdf

Here is my letter to the RNC — Which I also sent in the PRE=PAID envelope.. we can DEFUND McCain and the RNC one stamp at a time.. :)

David


179 posted on 06/10/2008 4:07:19 PM PDT by davidosborne (http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s) to elect Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Well they get the “golden parachute” when they sign on. At that time the board, which, by the way, IS controlled by shareholders, signs off on it. Major shareholders all have seats at the board table.

Where’s the beef ? (Other than envy some guy was able to negotiate 20M contract for himself).


180 posted on 06/10/2008 4:12:17 PM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson