Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Conservatives Dead or Resting?
American Thinker ^ | June 08, 2008 | Christopher Chantrill

Posted on 06/08/2008 6:37:34 AM PDT by vietvet67

The first boss I ever had, in 1968, was a Nixon-hater. A Democrat from upstate New York, he kept a coffee mug emblazoned with a Nixon $3 bill, and he could recite the litany of Nixon's red-baiting campaigns. First there was Jerry Voorhees in 1946, then there was Alger Hiss and the pumpkin papers. Then there was Helen Gahagan Douglas in 1950. You can imagine that I was surprised when Nixon won the presidency that November.

We learned later that Richard Nixon's victory over Hubert Humphrey in 1968 was the first victory of Nixon's "southern strategy," a deliberate attempt to woo Southern Democrats in the years after the passage of the landmark civil rights acts of the mid 1960s. "States rights" and "law and order" were racist code words calculated to appeal to the racist hearts of white Southern voters.

Over the years this meme seems to have become all-consuming and all-explaining for our Democratic friends. On the net there are hundreds of liberals for whom politics is defined by the Democrats' support of civil rights versus the Republicans' racist Southern Strategy. In Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America Rick Pearlstein tells us that today's divisive politics is all the result of Richard Nixon's cunning rise to power. We are the divided nation that Nixon created.

Even John B. Judis and Ruy Teixeira in The Emerging Democratic Majority,a generally optimistic prophecy of future Democratic dominance, need to poke Republicans in the eye on civil rights.

After 1964, the Democrats embraced, and the Republicans rejected, the cause of civil rights. The new conservative movement took root in opposition to the federal civil rights acts of 1964 and 1965.

(In the Chicago Spring of Reverend Wright and Father Pfleger, the above statement is hereby declared inoperative.)

Now comes The New Yorker's George Packer to expand on this in "The Fall of Conservatism." Pat Buchanan and Richard Nixon, he writes, saw the potential for a right-wing coalition back in 1966.

"From Day One, Nixon and I talked about creating a new majority," Buchanan told [Packer]... "What we talked about, basically, was shearing off huge segments of F.D.R.'s New Deal coalition[.]"

So off they went to sow division in the Democratic Party, using a politics of "positive polarization." It "ensured that American politics would be an ugly, unredeemed business for decades to come."

But now in 2008 "the movement that Goldwater began, Nixon brought to power, Ronald Reagan gave mass appeal, Gingrich radicalized, DeLay criminalized, and Bush allowed to break into pieces" is over. America is moving on into a new political era, for neither John McCain or Barack Obama got signed up in the Sixties for the culture war. According to David Brooks, "there's just no driving force, and it will soften up normal Republicans for real change."

It is certainly true that conservatives and Republicans feel disoriented and confused this election season. But it misses the point to say, as Packer does:

Now most conservatives seem incapable of even acknowledging the central issues of our moment: wage stagnation, inequality, health care, global warming. They are stuck in the past, in the dogma of limited government.

On the contrary, conservatives have rather clear ideas on the "central issues." Conservatives have a cure for wage stagnation and inequality. It is called education reform. Conservatives have a cure for inequality. It is called Social Security reform and aims to get lower-income Americans onto the wealth creation ladder. But we can't enact reform because Democrats won't let us. We'd like to reform health care by curbing the wasteful third-party payment system, and we are making some progress under the radar with Health Savings Accounts. But Democrats are pushing one-size-fits-all top-down changes to health care policy instead.

If you look back over the last 30 years, back over the record of conservative reform, there is one thing that stands out. Conservative reform never had a chance unless there was a crisis. The Reaganomics of hard money and low tax rates only got done in the crisis of Carter inflation/recession. The Bush tax cuts only got passed in the tech meltdown. Welfare reform only got passed when Newt Gingrich put a gun to President Clinton's reelection prospects in 1996.

The problem that today's conservatives face is that things aren't bad enough on the Social Security front, on the education front, or on the health-care front for the American people to be ready for "change." So Republican primary voters sensibly nominated John McCain, a man to fight the war on Islamic extremism while holding the line on domestic issues.

If you want to be cheered up about conservative prospects, you need only take a look at the resurgent Conservative Party in England. Eleven years ago Tony Blair got elected as "New Labour" to improve public services, supposedly wrecked by "Tory cuts." But after a doubling of health care expenditure and huge increases in education costs there is no improvement and the voters are hopping mad.

Now that he is 20 points ahead in the polls, what are the "central issues" for Conservative leader David Cameron? School choice, welfare reform, and police reform.

Christopher Chantrill is a frequent contributor to American Thinker. See his roadtothemiddleclass.com and usgovernmentspending.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservatives; conservativevote; mccain; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

1 posted on 06/08/2008 6:37:35 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
Are Conservatives Dead or Resting?

We'll know after the election. If they're dead, they'd have voted for Obama.

2 posted on 06/08/2008 6:39:08 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Obama's a front man. Who's behind him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

They’re not dead, they’re just pining for the fjords.


3 posted on 06/08/2008 6:41:10 AM PDT by MichiganMan (So you bought that big vehicle and now want to whine about how much it costs to fill it? Seriously?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

For now.... Dead

Like the Demos were dead 4 years ago with Kerry/Edwards who had little new ideas except to oppose the republicans.

It’ll take a leader like Reagan to bring conservatives back. How long that’ll take no one knows.


4 posted on 06/08/2008 6:42:12 AM PDT by guinness4strength
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guinness4strength
For now.... Dead Like the Demos were dead 4 years ago with Kerry/Edwards who had little new ideas except to oppose the republicans.

Kerry/Edwards received more than 48% of the popular vote in 2004. That's dead?

5 posted on 06/08/2008 6:44:56 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
So off they went to sow division in the Democratic Party, using a politics of "positive polarization." It "ensured that American politics would be an ugly, unredeemed business for decades to come."

LBJ's 1964 tv ad campaign showed KKK klansmen burning crosses and tried to link them to Goldwater.

LBJ's 1964 tv ad campaign showed a small child pulling the petals off a daisy and suddenly being killed in a nuclear holocaust by the goony Goldwater.

Yeah, 1966 was WHEN politics turned "ugly".

Sell that story someplace else.

6 posted on 06/08/2008 6:45:27 AM PDT by weegee (In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the 1st black woman to appear on presidential ballots in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Conservative are neither dead nor resting. They have been betrayed forgotten ignored and abandoned ... at the GOP’s peril. If we didn’t have such a dangerous Marxist asshat running on the other side who IMO MUST be kept out of the WH at all costs ... a third party would be in order


7 posted on 06/08/2008 6:45:42 AM PDT by clamper1797 (GWB was shock and awe ... Nobama is shuck and jive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Not dead. Just preparing for battle with which ever liberal is elected.


8 posted on 06/08/2008 6:46:50 AM PDT by cripplecreek (I miss the days when only the politicians were unethical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

I’m not Dead or Resting. I’m just tired of voting for the lesser of two evils!


9 posted on 06/08/2008 6:47:58 AM PDT by WesternPacific (I am tired of voting for the lesser of two evils!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guinness4strength

“It’ll take a leader like Reagan to bring conservatives back. How long that’ll take no one knows.”

Not that he could have filled Reagan’s shoes but I think the country missed an opportunity with Fred Thompson..


10 posted on 06/08/2008 6:49:04 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
It all depends on the definition of "conservative". I consider myself a conservative, but I am more of a conservatarian. This means I am conservative on law and order - national security, but a social libertarian. The modern conservative movement has been split by some social conservatives who want to establish a theocracy, or big govt social conservatism, and those who believe in Federalism. The American public will not tolerate any one wanting to establish a theocracy.
11 posted on 06/08/2008 6:49:04 AM PDT by Perdogg (McCain for President, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

We are broken right now. A ship without a rudder.


12 posted on 06/08/2008 6:49:10 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

I think there were never as many Conservatives as we thought. Many Republicans but not so many of them were conservative. That is the only thing I can think of to explain McCain’s success.


13 posted on 06/08/2008 6:50:17 AM PDT by csmusaret (John McCain is the evil of three lessers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
If you look back over the last 30 years, back over the record of conservative reform, there is one thing that stands out. Conservative reform never had a chance unless there was a crisis.

True enough. But the difference is that the last time "conservatives" were called on in a crisis they failed to help and they got cast back into the wilderness. So now, not all Americans trust that they will do what they say and Democrats point to Bill Clinton as the example of Democratic "budget balancing".

So we have a hard row to hoe.

If conservatives are ever given the chance again....they better actually do what they say and not just take over the Democratic power levers and perks like they did last time.
14 posted on 06/08/2008 6:51:16 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

The article believes that Senator McCain will hold the line on domestic issues. The article is mistaken.

Senator McCain’s support for the recently shelved Lieberman Warner Climate Security bill tells me Sen. McCain is left to far left on domestic issues.

Even President Bush, who has allowed government spending to go unchecked, threatened to veto Lieberman Warner.

Senator McCain’s support of Lieberman/Warner was enough to cost him my vote. It was the proverbial last straw.


15 posted on 06/08/2008 6:52:48 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WesternPacific

I was all set to vote for the lesser of two evils one last time. Then Lieberman/Warner came along and convinced me otherwise.


16 posted on 06/08/2008 6:55:30 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
Not that he could have filled Reagan’s shoes but I think the country missed an opportunity with Fred Thompson..

That was a big miss.

Real big. Now we have Juan MxCain. Or Mr. Hussien.

I could puke but instead I am back to gathering sell-sufficiency infrastructure items in case the unthinkable actually does occur.

17 posted on 06/08/2008 6:55:39 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The modern conservative movement has been split by some social conservatives who want to establish a theocracy,

Oh please, maybe you should look up the word “theocracy”.


18 posted on 06/08/2008 6:57:08 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (It's too bad I've already promised myself to never vote for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

“Not that he could have filled Reagan’s shoes but I think the country missed an opportunity with Fred Thompson..”

That needed to be posted again!


19 posted on 06/08/2008 6:59:06 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
It's been quite obvious conservatives don't make their politics their religion like liberals and moderates do. What is always worrisome is do an adequate amount of us care enough to not only stop the left, but carry conservatism forward? And in this past 13 years when conservatives had the chance to put down liberalism for a good long while they caved into it.

It's not the liberals who destroy conservative thought, it's the moderates and rino's within our own party. And if repubs keep voting and embrasing these progressive social ideas and with canidates who hold them, liberals will win the day.

Many Conservatives are realy just politically lazy.

20 posted on 06/08/2008 6:59:18 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Yes, Chef!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson