Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lab-on-a-Chip Made of Paper
The Future Of Things ^ | May 28, 2008 | Roni Barr

Posted on 06/07/2008 11:17:14 PM PDT by neverdem

Researchers at Harvard's Whitesides Research Group may have found a way to make microfluidics technology much cheaper by taking advantage of the natural movement of liquid through paper. Hopefully, their work will lead to the creation of disposable diagnostic tests, which will be simple and abundant enough for use in the developing world.

 Albert Folch (Credit: University of Washington)
Albert Folch
(Credit: University
of Washington)
Microfluidics deals with the manipulation of liquid and one of its most promising applications is a lab-on-a-chip, which can work with much smaller fluid samples than larger devices. Existing microfluidic chips are generally made from relatively expensive materials like silicon, glass, or plastic, and have tiny pumps and valves that can be difficult to manufacture. George Whitesides and his team at Harvard have recently built a microfluidic device on a square of paper the size of a pinky fingernail. This device is the first example of paper microfluidics and is considered to be clever because paper is universally available. 

Larger paper tests, like pregnancy tests, are common, but shrinking the paper and minimizing the quantity of required chemical reagents helps to reduce costs. Directing the sample to particular regions enables simultaneous performance of several tests. It also means that fluid samples can be much smaller, eliminating the need for syringes in developing countries. 

The paper's natural network of capillaries is used to channel the liquid to the wells at the branches of the paper, allowing for multiple tests to be conducted simultaneously. However, the paper's limited pumping action will probably keep it from performing more complex chemical reactions in the near future. 

Prototype of the new paper lab-on-a-chip (Credit: Andres W. Martinez) 
Prototype of the new
paper lab-on-a-chip
(Credit: Andres W. Martinez)
In addition to being cheaper, these devices are light weight, disposable, and resistant to breakage, making them more portable and practical in the developing world. In an attempt to minimize the level of expertise needed to use the tests, the team plans to combine the paper tests with a system of cell phones for off-site diagnosis. The team envisions that in rural areas where doctors are limited, people who are trained only to conduct the tests carry them out "and send them back to a central facility where a doctor looks at that information and (recommends) diagnosis and treatment without having to actually be there," says Whitesides. 

The next step is clinical trials and deployment in Africa, although the team is currently still testing the device under harsh conditions such as extreme heat, humidity, and pressure. The test units do not seem to be adversely affected. The team hopes to move beyond humans and develop tests for water, livestock, and other food sources.

TFOT recently covered several lab-on-a-chip devices. These chips include the "lab on a chip" for detecting oral cancer cells, developed at Texas University, and the Nanocytometer, which locates cancer cells or other specific cells in the blood, developed at the University of California, Berkeley.

More on the paper microfluidics technology can be found on MIT's Technology-Review website.


Print this item
2007 © All rights reserved to TFOT.info


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: health; labonachip; medicine; microfluidics

1 posted on 06/07/2008 11:17:15 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Future Of Things says: “Hopefully, their work will lead to the creation of disposable diagnostic tests, which will be simple and abundant enough for use in the developing world.”

I say, hopefully, disposable tests will be simple and abundant enough for use in American homes so we can self-diagnose and self-medicate and chop out ultra-expensive doctors and laboratories from our health care budgets.

2 posted on 06/07/2008 11:34:51 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

The eighteen cent tests will be priced over a thousand dollars for us, so that we can pay for the rest of the world, I’m sure....


3 posted on 06/08/2008 12:34:43 AM PDT by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen; kingu
I say, hopefully, disposable tests will be simple and abundant enough for use in American homes so we can self-diagnose and self-medicate and chop out ultra-expensive doctors and laboratories from our health care budgets.

I regret to inform you that a person's medical history will still make the diagnosis about 90% of the time. An assortment of lab and imaging tests will confirm it. You'll need a doc to monitor adverse drug reactions. The more that is learned, the more new questions that you have.


4 posted on 06/08/2008 1:48:59 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"This device is the first example of paper microfluidics and is considered to be clever because paper is universally available."

ARRGGHHHH!!! Someone needs to remind these guys about an analytical procedure called "paper chromatography"--a fluidic technology which is almost "older than dirt".

5 posted on 06/08/2008 3:33:12 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

> ... and chop out ultra-expensive doctors and laboratories from our health care budgets ...

The doctors, laboratories and hospitals are not atually the cost drivers. It is lawyers, litigation and insurance that make health care expensive. My daughter’s pediatrician has a plaque posted in the waiting room of his office. That says “DPT innoculation: vaccine $2.85 + insurance $87.50 + doctor’s fee $5 = $95.35”

Yes, you still just pay just the $10 co-pay at the office, but you are still paying for everything via your health insurance rates.


6 posted on 06/08/2008 6:01:15 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

The insurance that you mention is not so much the health insurance you and I pay for, it’s the malpractice rates that the doctor has to pay. At least one third of his gross. It’s a cost of doing business, which of course gets passed along to the consumer. And it does impact the health insurance rates.


7 posted on 06/08/2008 6:56:06 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Leftism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

I already asked about that. It is the liability insurance the drug company pays for the vaccine.


8 posted on 06/08/2008 7:43:37 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

yeah, but we will probably end up with an epidemic of paper cuts.


9 posted on 06/08/2008 8:11:37 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

O U C H !


10 posted on 06/08/2008 8:21:33 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
neverdem - I strongly disagree - you are plotting a trajectory of health costs that will at some point in the future consume all human production and savings - you are suggesting that current health costs cannot go down if the current level of human health is to be maintained - you are suggesting that advances in human health can only come about if more money is committed to health treatment - that is not the historical experience in areas of the economy that are exposed to financial transparency and competition - in the last century, in the USA, the cost of food, textiles, energy, and telecommunication have come down dramatically - economic sectors that see cost increases, like housing, rise only because consumers demand more space, higher quality, and more luxury - in the USA, I believe health costs are now above 16% of GDP - yet, half of all doctor visits result in no quantifiable improvement in the patient's condition - more than 25% of USA health care is committed to patients in the last year of life - perverse outcomes like this exist only because most USA health consumers do not see or feel the true costs of their treatments - if, or when, health care consumers do see the true costs, they will demand less expensive options and better outcomes, and American entrepreneurs will leap to provide the solutions - yes, health care is unlike most commercial business in that some treatments must be highly customized, some treatments carry high risk, and surgery cannot be done at home - yes, failing to treat, because a health consumer may not have money, will always be morally unacceptable - but, the home based, self-treatment ideal I described in my first post would be largely obtainable for motivated health consumers in a free market health economy - a comprehensive health history can be easily maintained on the web - in the near future, software programs could easily ask me follow up questions and prescribe medication, and could warn and educate me about outcomes and side effects - whew, sorry, long, long winded exposition - bottom line for me, I refuse to accept the idea that most Americans need their health care directed by, and monitored by, legions of highly paid professionals with six to twelve years of post graduate training - in closing, thanks for your daily science and technology posts - when I see the name “neverdem,” I always click
11 posted on 06/08/2008 9:40:18 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm not sure where to start.

Survey: 60% Of Primary Care Physicians Would Choose Another Field

We have to import nurses from overseas. Medical knowledge increases only at the margins. We don't know what we don't know. a comprehensive health history can be easily maintained on the web could be very problematic with respect to employment, insurance and exploitation by bad guys. You can't take human nature and ignorance out of medicine. You also have to figure in government mandates and lawyers.

12 posted on 06/08/2008 2:30:31 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson