Alaska’s Gull Island Oil Fields Could Power U.S. for 200 Yrs

the web ^ | unk | From Email

[Exton1]

Alaska’s Gull Island Oil Fields Could Power U.S. for 200 Yrs This is a video on how we are being lied to and manipulated. and that Oil is being used to control the people of the world.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147&hl=en

Rad This is a video on how we are being lied to and manipulated. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147&hl=en

[SandRat]

Can’t drill here. Can’t build or improve refineries here, can’t build Nuke Power plants, can’t allow that here. The EnviroNUTZIEs and DimoRATs tell us so.

[RightWhale]

This is a pile.

[Bommer]

It makes perfect sense. Since in the past we depended almost 100% on our own oil You say diversify and get 60% of our oil from our enemies liks Venezuela and Saudi Arabia that can cut off the spicket at any time for any reason and are at the mercy of whatever war is going on in the region, verses Canada, our friend, across the border from us that has more oil than the Saudis and Venezuela combined! Not much likely to happen to Canada to promote a world crisis

[hosepipe]

Evidently the republican party has also been nationalized..

The republican primarys selected a stone socialist to run against the two other socialist/marxist.. And many republicans like chimps shake Bushes and make noise but do nothing..

The republican party IS A MYTH..

[elfman2]

“Oil goes to where it is easiest and cheapest to ship to and to refine.

The bulk of the U.S. refining capacities is NOT on the West Coast.
“

I’m sorry. This is an official kook thread and you’re inciting content with with talk of fungibility and making sense. Please leave immediately or you’ll be branded a sheeple kool-aid drinking oil company apologist.

[hosepipe]

[ Can anyone tell me if GWB could issue an executive order to ok drilling for oil and natural gas in some of the known reserve locations? I know he probably wouldn't but would it work if he did? ]

George Bush is a globalist.. meaning anti republican..

[AndyJackson]

I am going into the bridge business.

[elfman2]

“It makes perfect sense. Since in the past we depended almost 100% on our own oil You say diversify and get 60% of our oil from “

Are you drunk? (I suggest you say yes.)

[pgkdan]

Japan funded the construction of the Alaska pipeline and in return they are guaranteed the right to buy a portion of what flows through that pipeline.

[nmh]

BTTT!

[AmericaUnited]

It was said that there was enough natural gas to supply America for 200 years. But to this day, “not one drop” of that oil(?? Oil or Gas) has been released to American refineries, Williams said.

[penowa]

"Why do our U.S. Senators stand by while watching this accelerating nightmare of 182,000 invaders added to our country ever 30 days?"

Because the invasion is a big part of the plan to bring down the Republic.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

TANKS a bunch,,,saved that one,,,

I have a family member that is now retired from

Texas Eastern Pipeline Corp. that says nearly the same

thing. “Peak Oil Is BS!”,,,

The former head of Arbusto Energy also knows this,,,Who?

George W. Bush! The POTUS!

[stockpirate]

I read a good quote yesterday, it went something like this: “Republicans have been telling Conservatives to vote for the lesser of two evils for years.....”

The problem is the Republican Party is full of RINO’s which is PC speak for Socialist.

We need to purge the party of RINO’s or start a Conservative party and ONLY allow Conservatives.

[RightWhale]

LOL

[LtKerst]

i HAVE ONE QUESTION Lindsey Williams says that gas would cost$1.50 a gallon if we pumped it from Alaska.

Says who? if they are gouging us now, why would they drop the price? why would they do that if they are in controll?

who would tell them to lower it?

You? Me? Lindsey is wrong about that part of his speach.

if they started pumping it today...it would never drop. their profits would just go up.

[winged1]

It is time for Homeland Security to investigate these enviro organizations and track their funds back to the Arabs. Only the Arabs and other oil suppliers profit from the United States not being able to drill for our own oil. Congress critters are only part of the problem. The bigger part of their problem are the lobbys that control them.

[SunkenCiv]

Market Drowns in Sea of Oil; Dow Dives 325
FoxBusiness | 6-6-08 | Matt Egan
Posted on 06/06/2008 12:09:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2027241/posts

Lord Lawson claims climate change hysteria heralds a ‘new age of unreason’
telegraph | April 6, 2008 | Christopher Booker
Posted on 06/02/2008 9:33:04 AM PDT by Tolik
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024841/posts

[Polybius]

Oil goes to where it is easiest and cheapest to ship to and to refine.

If that were true then why do we not get 100% of our oil from Canada? Your saying that the 40% we get from the Saudis from tankers sailing across the ocean is easier and cheaperthan getting it from Manatoba & Saskatchewan?

You're a landlubber, aren't ya matey? :-)

That is EXACTLY what I am saying.

Why do you think the Eire Canal was built thorough perfectly good solid ground?

Because water makes the transportation of massive amounts of freight so easy that a pair of mules can effortlessly move tons of floating freight that they could not budge if it were on a wheeled vehicle.

The total U.S. oil consumption is 20.8 million bbl/day (2005 est.)

The entire Canadian crude oil pipeline capacity is 2.65 million barrels of crude oil per day

How are you going to transport the remaining 18 million barrels of crude oil per day from Manitoba & Saskatchewan to the Gulf Coast refineries?

Drive it down Interstate 25 in mile long convoys of 7,000 gallon tanker trucks?

This is an oil tanker.

Each one can carry two million barrels of oil. That equals 84 million gallons of oil. That represents the carrying capacity of 12,000 tanker trucks.

In other words, the entire Canadian pipeline system can only carry 66% of the volume of oil per day that only two of these tankers can hold.

That is how the U.S. must deliver the other 18 million barrels of oil it consumes to U.S. refineries.

Is it easier and safer to sail from Saudi Arabia to the Gulf Coast than to make the treacherous "around the Horn" voyage from Alaska to the Gulf Coast refineries?

Yes.

You want to physically move 20 million barrels of oil per day from Manitoba & Saskatchewan to the Gulf Coast refineries?

Well, as they say in Maine, "Sorry. You can't get there from here."

[Polybius]

I’m sorry. This is an official kook thread and you’re inciting content with with talk of fungibility and making sense. Please leave immediately or you’ll be branded a sheeple kool-aid drinking oil company apologist.

Ooops. I should have read this before writing Post 39.

Oh well, it was fun pointing out that it is easier to pull a ton of floating stuff than it is to drag a ton of stuff over dry land. :-)