Skip to comments.
Exponential Technologies: Cheer Up World—We Are On the Verge of Great Things
dailygalaxy ^
| June 05, 2008
Posted on 06/06/2008 11:19:43 PM PDT by ckilmer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: Common Tator
Gary Kildall had a Ph.D. from the University of Washington.
41
posted on
06/09/2008 6:28:35 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: neverdem
42
posted on
06/16/2008 10:07:29 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
43
posted on
06/16/2008 10:09:31 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
K sez:
- Within 5 years the exponential progress in nanoengineering will make Solar power cost-competitive with fossil fuels
- Within 10 years we will have a pill that allows us all to eat whatever we feel like and never gain any unwanted weight
- In 15 years, life expectancies will start rising faster than we age
- In about 20 years 100% of our energy will come from clean and renewable sources
- a computer will pass the Turing Test by carrying on a conversation that is indistinguishable from a humans.
The only way photovoltaics can overtake liquid hydrocarbon fuels is if the price of crude continues upward to $1000 a barrel (give or take).
I'd like to see the magic diet pill, but I'd much rather see something done about hair loss. There are plenty of ways to lose weight.
Kurzweil has been powering down supplements in an attempt to live forever, and I'll predict that he'll wind up shortening his life as a result. He's also said that all of our brain contents would someday be downloadable into a computer (that's #3 and #5 on this list), showing that he read too many comic books and pulp sci-fi as a kid.
In #1 he makes an unlikely claim about photovoltaics, then pretty much repeats himself in #4. Obsession, or dementia?
#5 is another comic book reader response. There was a book a few years back about the chess-playing machine from a hundred years ago, which turned out in retrospect to be a fraud (a human chess player was hidden inside). Chess programs have improved. Have poker programs? ;') Creativity may be simulated eventually, but I very much doubt it will happen in my lifetime.
Here's five from me:
- Within 5 years fuel economy will rise at least 15 per cent, and electric vehicles in a number of forms will outshine progress made on fuel cell vehicles
- Within 10 years genetically-engineered food will be commonplace, and considered healthier than fresh, organically-grown produce picked by people with TB
- In 15 years, life expectancies will start to move back up, after having fallen for up to five years
- In about 20 years, our energy will come the same sorts of sources as now, with some additional sources such as plasma waste disposal and neighborhood natural gas-powered fuel cells
- In about 20 years, typical CPU sizes will be smaller than the Mac Mini, use a superconducting substrate, and be cheap enough and sufficiently multifunctional that they will be found in each room of the house (and then some).
44
posted on
06/16/2008 10:31:23 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
The World Question Center 2004Zangger's First Law
Most scientific breakthroughs are nothing else than the discovery of the obvious.
Zangger's Second Law
Truly great science is always ahead of its time.
Although there seems to be a slight contradiction in my laws, historical evidence proves them right:
- The Hungarian surgeon Ignaz Semmelweiss in 1847 reduced the death rate in his hospital from twelve to two percent, simply by washing hands between operations -- a concept that today would be advocated by a four year old child. When Semmelweiss urged his colleagues to introduce hygiene to the operating rooms, they had him committed to a mental hospital where he eventually died.
- The German meteorologist Alfred Wegener discovered in 1913 what every ten year old looking at a globe will notice immediately: That the Atlantic coasts of the African and South American continents have matching contours and thus may have been locked together some time ago. The experts needed sixty more years to comprehend the concept.
- When Louis Pasteur stated that bacteria could cause disease, colleagues treated the idea as "an absurd fantasy'!
- The theories of the Austrian psychiatrist Sigmund Freud were called "a case for the police" during a neurologists' congress in Hamburg in 1910.
- Lord Kelvin, President of the Royal Society, only eight years before Orville and Wilbur Wright left the ground in an aeroplane, remarked: "Machines that are heavier than air will never be able to fly!"
- German physicists Erwin Schrödinger's PhD thesis, in which he first introduced his famous equation, was initially rejected.
- When the Spanish nobleman de Satuola discovered the Late Ice Age painted cave at Altamira, established scholars described him as a forger and a cheat.
- The decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs by Jean Francois Champollion in 1822 was still rejected by scholar twenty years after his death.
- And when Johann Karl Fuhlrott discovered the bones of a Neanderthal in a cave near Duesseldorf in 1856, the president of the German Society of Anthropology considered it a bow-legged, Mongolian Cossack with rickets, who had been lucky enough to survive multiple head injuries, but who, during a campaign by Russian forces against France in 1814, had been wounded, and (stark naked) had crawled into a cave, where he died.
- Heinrich Schliemann's excavation of Bronze Age Mycenae and Tiryns in Greece was considered by English archaeologists in The Times' as the remains of some obscure barbarian tribe' from the Byzantine period. In particular, the so-called prehistoric palace in Tiryns was labelled "the most remarkable hallucination of an unscientific enthusiast that has ever appeared in literature."
Scientific breakthroughs will always be held hostage to the lag needed to overcome existing beliefs. Lucius Annaeus Seneca realized this already two thousand years ago, when he said: "The time will come, when our successors will be surprised that we did not know such obvious things."
45
posted on
06/16/2008 10:36:08 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
46
posted on
06/16/2008 10:42:32 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: Common Tator
Just had an interesting discussion today about how the incandescent lightbulb is going away.
Nick Holonyak has BS/MS/PhD.
47
posted on
06/22/2008 9:54:02 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
Gary Arlen Kildall had a PhD and an operating system that only needed to be converted to run on the IBM PC. But Kildall had a PhD and therefor was no match for a pennyless college drop out named Bill Gates
Kildall was defeated and his company distroyed by a guy who dropped out of college and who bought the rights to DOS 1.10 with 50 grand of borrowed money.
You make my point. A man with a PhD and a successful operating system company, could not beat a college drop out who had some creativity left undamaged and a tiny (at the time) start up called Microsoft.
To: Common Tator
You make my point. A man with a PhD and a successful operating system company, could not beat a college drop out who had some creativity left undamaged and a tiny (at the time) start up called Microsoft. I thought we were talking about creation of advances, not who is better at shady business practices. Dr. Kildall is the one who created the product. Bill Gates is the one who bought and marketed a ripoff of it. Why is the latter supposed to be viewed as the one who has advanced our technology and is so creative?
I also note that you neglected to mention a large trust fund of poor-little-rich-kid Bill Gates.
"Ask Bill why function code 6 (in DOS) ends with a dollar sign . . . . No one in the world knows that but me." --Gary Kildall, PhD
49
posted on
06/22/2008 2:00:55 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
I thought we were talking about creation of advances, not who is better at shady business practices. Dr. Kildall is the one who created the product. Bill Gates is the one who bought and marketed a ripoff of it. Why is the latter supposed to be viewed as the one who has advanced our technology and is so creative? Who deserves the most credit for the automobile? The man who invented it -- Charles Duryea? Or the man who changed the way the world got around -- Henry Ford?
Don't dismiss what Gates did just because he didn't invent DOS.
50
posted on
06/22/2008 2:09:21 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: ckilmer
The real question is..”how many freedoms will we give up along the way”?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson