Posted on 06/05/2008 3:20:48 PM PDT by mdittmar
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama did not rule out Palestinian sovereignty over parts of Jerusalem when he called for Israel's capital to remain "undivided," his campaign told The Jerusalem Post Thursday.
"Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided," Obama declared Wednesday, to rousing applause from the 7,000-plus attendees at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee policy conference.
But a campaign adviser clarified Thursday that Obama believes "Jerusalem is a final status issue, which means it has to be negotiated between the two parties" as part of "an agreement that they both can live with."
"Two principles should apply to any outcome," which the adviser gave as: "Jerusalem remains Israel's capital and it's not going to be divided by barbed wire and checkpoints as it was in 1948-1967."
He refused, however, to rule out other configurations, such as the city also serving as the capital of a Palestinian state or Palestinian sovereignty over Arab neighborhoods.
"Beyond those principles, all other aspects are for the two parties to agree at final status negotiations," the Obama adviser said.
Many on the right of the political spectrum among America's Jews welcomed Obama's remarks at AIPAC, but the clarification of his position left several cold.
"The Orthodox Union is extremely disappointed in this revision of Senator Obama's important statement about Jerusalem," said Nathan Diament, director of public policy for the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations. He had sent out a release Wednesday applauding Obama's Jerusalem remarks in front of AIPAC.
"In the current context, everyone understands that saying 'Jerusalem... must remain undivided' means that the holy city must remain unified under Israeli rule, as it has been since 1967," Diament explained.
"If Senator Obama intended his remarks at AIPAC to be understood in this way, he said nothing that would reasonably lead to such a different interpretation."
Morton Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America and another Jewish activist who had originally lauded Obama's statement, now called the candidate's words "troubling."
"It means he used the term inappropriately, possibly to mislead strong supporters of Israel that he supports something he doesn't really believe," Klein charged.
Obama has faced questions about his support for Israel from hawkish quarters of the Jewish community, and his campaign said the speech before AIPAC, following a town hall meeting at a Florida synagogue last month, were key elements in shoring up the Jewish vote, which generally goes to the Democrats.
"We think we've gotten a good reaction to the speech and we're pleased that we've gotten a good reaction," said the campaign adviser of the candidate's AIPAC address, which received multiple sustained standing ovations.
But not everyone was pleased with the speech, particularly Palestinians.
"This statement is totally rejected," said Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, whom a top aide described as "disappointed."
"The whole world knows that holy Jerusalem was occupied in 1967 and we will not accept a Palestinian state without having Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian state," Abbas said.
The Obama campaign adviser said that whatever the international reaction, it was important for the Illinois senator to "make his positions clear."
"Our main audience is American voters at the moment. Other people want to know where he stands and it's important that they do know where he stands," he said.
Speaking generally about the speech, which also stressed the importance of a secure Israel and the need to isolate Hamas, Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri told Reuters: "Obama's comments have confirmed that there will be no change in the US administration's foreign policy on the Arab-Israeli conflict."
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, however, called Obama's address "moving," adding that he was also impressed by the speeches delivered at the same conference by Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, and presumptive Republican nominee, John McCain.
Olmert spoke to all three candidates by phone Thursday as he wrapped up a three-day visit to Washington
And yet Mr O will get the majority of the Jewish vote. Go figure.
gee, this is such a . . . . . . . . . shock.
Does Obama even know where Israel is located?
I’m sure it’s a complete coincidence that Obama’s “mistakes” always favor whatever group he is speaking to at the time.
In a turn of events, Americans are asked to eat Obama’s waffles. Obama says, “Shut up and eat it. Your obamessiah has spoken!”
A liar, panderer and flip-flopper...hellbells, Hussein is Clinton and Kerry rolled into one!
Double talking jive!
***Daniel Kurtzer, former ambassador to Israel and advisor of U.S. presidential hopeful Barack Obama, said Tuesday that Jerusalem must be included in peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
“It will be impossible to make progress on serious peace talks without putting the future of Jerusalem on the table,” Kurtzer said in a conference organized by the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute (JPPPI).***
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/982964.html
I e-mailed the members of AIPAC with this info yesterday right before Obama and during Pelosi’s speech.
John Kerry was a flip flopper because he has no core beliefs and followed the wind of public opinion.
Obama flip flops because he’s to clueless to know what’s going on, and then when he finds out he has to change his position so he doesn’t look completely ridiculous.
Fear not, our dogged MSM will call him on it. /s
The problem with Obama is that his grasp on history and foreign affairs is so tenuous and colored by the lefty types (seemingly to include Michelle) that were his mentors that he doesn’t even know what he is saying. He just reads what his handlers put in front of him.
what?????? Is he kidding? McCain better clobber him with this.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
The Old City has been broken into 4 parts for a long time. What does he want? I have no idea, and neither does he. It sounds like he doesn’t even get that’s been broken up for a lot longer than ‘48.
Obama is stupendously ignorant when it comes to US foreign policy and the outside world in general
Obama's real expertise is catering to racial grievances, racial issues and gimme programs. Social justice "issues" within the USA
They are actually saying “divided” only means “divided by barbed wire and checkpoints??? So the city will remain undivided - until it is divided. Obama is scum.
How long is a "long time"? The British divided the Old City into "Moslem," "Christian," "Jewish," and "Armenian" quarters in the 1930's.
obama is an empty suit,and hillary will be VP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.