Skip to comments.
Fear and loathing in Hillaryland, where the invincible became unelectable
Times on Line.uk ^
| 6/05/2008
| Tom Baldwin
Posted on 06/05/2008 9:47:08 AM PDT by ex-Texan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
I also found this cartoon of The Witch on The Times. It appears the entire world knows about Hillary Clinton.
1
posted on
06/05/2008 9:47:11 AM PDT
by
ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
2
posted on
06/05/2008 9:48:56 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
Fact is, HRC should have won, and actually probably did/could have won more VOTES.
She blew it by giving up on caucus states, not having a post Super Tuesday plan AND forgetting the power of the way the Dems divvy up delegates in districts.
She only has herself to blame.
To: ex-Texan
Yea for the end of the Clinton Era! I love how the Dim party chose the one guy the could NEVER get elected! Not cause he is Black or anything like that. Its cause he is a FAR left liberal NUT JOB! If anything the country wants a centrist, which fits Hillary FAR better than Obama, though nowhere near close enough to the center for me. McCain can beat Obama. He will be able to get the independent vote that obama does not have a prayer of getting, and THAT is gonna win the election.
4
posted on
06/05/2008 9:53:13 AM PDT
by
Danae
(Remember: Obama = Pull out from Iraq. PLAN on voting, or accept responsibility for the consequences.)
To: ex-Texan
“Puce faced.” Perhaps someone in the UK can translate this ?
To: ex-Texan
I wonder if her fortunes would reverse if Osamabama were to meet with an unforeseen accident?
6
posted on
06/05/2008 10:02:00 AM PDT
by
Dumpster Baby
(Real men drink mercury)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
I’m in the UK and I can attest that no-one says “puce-faced”. I mean no-one.
To: Crimson Elephant
Fact is, HRC should have won, and actually
probably did/could have won more VOTES. So in baseball you think the team that wins the world series in the one with the most runs - not the most games won?
If you're going to change the rules in mid-stream, why not declare that the winner is the person Bill Clinton is for - and save the money involved in letting people vote.
8
posted on
06/05/2008 10:03:03 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
( World Series - it's how many games are won, not total runs. Same for Hillary's "total vote" crap.)
To: ex-Texan
What a goofy article.
Iowa leftists are not conservative.
To: GOPJ
What are you talking about? Seriously...I have no idea what you are getting from my post.
I simply said that Hillary should have won, if she had campaigned properly. The fact she possibly does or could have more votes means she screwed up in her campaign. As I said, she only has herself to blame.
What that has to do with the World Series is beyond me.
To: agere_contra
Reddish brown or purple brown. This certainly describes BJ at his finger-wagging best.
To: ex-Texan
H1 ain’t over (for 4 yr) until November comes without her on a ticket or she looses.
12
posted on
06/05/2008 10:29:42 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Huma for co-president!)
To: ex-Texan
H1 ain’t over (for 4 yr) until November comes without her on a ticket or she loses.
13
posted on
06/05/2008 10:29:56 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Huma for co-president!)
To: dead
14
posted on
06/05/2008 10:34:44 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Average White Conservative)
To: Crimson Elephant
probably did/could have won more VOTES. My point was we don't count total votes any more than we count "total runs" in the World Series.
In baseball it's how many games are won - and in the democrat primary it's not how many individuals voted, it's how many delegates were won.
And she did NOT win more delegates. The only way to get a win for her is to change the rules. Count it differently. In short, CHEAT. Define the rules of the race after the fact. That was my point.
15
posted on
06/05/2008 10:38:06 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
( World Series - it's how many games are won, not total runs. Same for Hillary's "total vote" crap.)
To: GOPJ
And my point was pointing out that she SHOULD have won, but her own campaign screwed it up by her failure to have a coherent strategy. I didn’t say she had more delegates, she clearly doesn’t, but she lost because of her silly campaign strategy.
To: reagan_fanatic
Aw, come on. It’s not like somebody posted a picture of HELEN THOMAS!!
17
posted on
06/05/2008 12:51:01 PM PDT
by
thulldud
(Congress does not want answers. They want scapegoats. (andy58-in-nh))
To: thulldud
Well....
MAYBE THEY SHOULD HAVE!!!
18
posted on
06/05/2008 12:57:55 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Average White Conservative)
To: agere_contra; Eric in the Ozarks
Pink face or ruddy complexion, maybe?
19
posted on
06/05/2008 5:35:28 PM PDT
by
oyez
(Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
To: Crimson Elephant
“It will be me.” —Hillery Clinton.
That little statement just had to turn a few people off.
20
posted on
06/05/2008 5:38:27 PM PDT
by
oyez
(Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson