Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin19a

By that measure, all of the votes in Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, and any other state that has consistently voted for the GOP in presidential elections in recent years should also be thrown out.


71 posted on 06/04/2008 8:59:28 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Don't mind me, I'm just trying to make sense of the numbers here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

I'm sorry I wasn't clear....I was speaking to the headline as it relates to the rat primaries and rat nomination, regardless of red state/blue state.

hillary’s claim has always been she is more competitive in competitive states, and I believe she is right.
(Michigan/Florida/Ohio)

Except for psychological reasons, it just doesn't make sense to claim to be the king or queen of the Rat primary “popular” vote.

I used the 632k+ win for Obama in the illinois primary as an example of the winner of the total popular vote being skewered, as Illinois electoral votes will go rat in the general anyway. For awhile, that 632k+ (it's now up to 650k) margin was the exact margin of Obama’s popular vote lead.

And hillary won Puerto Rico by 141k + - yet PR can't vote in the general presidential election, what good is counting the popular here...
She also won NY by 300k+ votes. I believe NY also goes RAT in the general, regardless.

Course, if there really is a michelle- whitey tape - and it's shown ?

77 posted on 06/04/2008 9:49:12 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson