Skip to comments.
Party of Defeat
Cross Action News ^
| 6-4-08
| David Horowitz
Posted on 06/04/2008 6:32:01 AM PDT by Victory111
Most conversations about the coming elections focus on the question of which candidate is most suited to lead the nation as it confronts the challenges and threats ahead. A better question would be to ask whether there is one party the Democratic Party which has demonstrated in word and deed that it is unfit to lead the nation in war at all. Criticism of government policy is essential to a democracy.
(Excerpt) Read more at crossactionnews.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dean; democratparty; democrats; election; elections; iraq; kerry; wot
To: Victory111
2
posted on
06/04/2008 7:00:10 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Victory111
Excellenct
piece by Horowitz! (same as link above)
If your thoughtful, open-minded friends on the other side of the aisle won't have respect for the succinct logic in this article, they are lost.
Send them a link in email: http://www.crossactionnews.com/articles/view/party-of-defeat
HF
3
posted on
06/04/2008 7:10:25 AM PDT
by
holden
To: Victory111
Criticism of government policy is essential to a democracy.
I agree with Horowitz's statement. However, the trick is- and always has been- to have sufficient reserves of national will and fortitude to clean up the mess that democracy invariably creates as a result of the madness of the mob and the Socialist vermin who manipulate them.
I am increasingly suspicious of America's supply of backbone. One of these days we might not be able to rebound from these continuing bouts of "democratic flu." Thanks for posting a great article.
4
posted on
06/04/2008 7:12:16 AM PDT
by
PerConPat
(A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
To: Victory111
Excellent overview/summary of the five year effort of the Democrats to sabotage the U. S. in Iraq and Afghanistan and bring about U. S. defeat.
That Bush overcame that effort is a testament to his unwavering commitment and dedication - and tactical adroitness. Would that his educating the public on the mission have been better - but perhaps it would have been if not for the MSM gatekeeper.
5
posted on
06/04/2008 8:10:41 AM PDT
by
mtntop3
To: Jeff Head
Nov. will be the emotional voters vs the thinking-serious issues voters. It appears now that the emotional voters are in the lead with energy and Messiah-like delusions. Socialist-pacifism seems in the forefront. God help us.
To: phillyfanatic
Those wild eyed people represent the millions of Americans raised in the government day-care and indoctrination centers we call public schools who did not have, or would not listen to, parents and others who tried to counterweight the garbage they heard at school...who have been raised on 60 second sound bite time spans and know no better.
You have other tens of millions on the dole who will vote for him regardless of position because he promises to keep pilfering the public largess for them.
Still othes of millions will vote for him simply because he is black.
Other millions will vote for him because they know exactly who he is and what he represents and agree with his anti-American positions.
The first three are all what is termed, useful idiots, a term coined by Lenin for the dupes he got to support him.
Against this it is left to us to educate, arouse, and amass the tens of millions of Americans who understand and hold fast to the foundational principles our constitutional republic rests upon...many of them the bitter, rural Americans clinging to their guns and religion that Obama so arrogantly spoke of.
7
posted on
06/04/2008 10:55:39 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Victory111
8
posted on
06/04/2008 4:14:18 PM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: Jeff Head
What a great column - Horowitz explains so clearly why our current Demagogues are among the most contemptible and worthless pols in our nation's history:
"But the most self-serving and deceptive of the lies told by the Democratic leadership is this: you can support the troops and not support the war. No you cant. You cant tell a 19-year old, who is risking his young life in Fallujah and who is surrounded by terrorists who want to kill him, that he shouldnt be there in the first place; that hes with the bad guys the aggressors, the occupiers, who have no moral right to be Iraq. You cant do that and not undermine his morale, encourage his enemies, deprive him of allies and put him in danger. And that is exactly what the Democrats have done and all the Democrats have done in five years of Americas war to deny the terrorists victory in Iraq. Such a party is unfit to lead this nation in war. To place it in a position to do so would be to invite a tragedy of epic proportions."
9
posted on
06/04/2008 9:44:24 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
10
posted on
06/08/2008 9:28:32 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
11
posted on
06/08/2008 9:37:28 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson