Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Birth of a Number
National Journal ^ | May 31, 2008 | Neil Munro

Posted on 06/03/2008 1:39:05 PM PDT by forkinsocket

Does one of every four American teenagers really have a sexually transmitted disease? No, despite headlines given to a recent federal study.

On March 11, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that one in four teenage girls has a sexually transmitted disease.

This eye-opening statistic landed like a dead rat on the doorsteps of America’s 37 million households and 30 million teenagers. The New York Times, among other papers, put the news on the front page. CBS news anchor Katie Couric told her viewers that “at least one in four teenage girls in America has a sexually transmitted disease,” and she ended by saying, “I know what I’ll be talking about at the dinner table tonight.”

The one-in-four number “really caught every parent in America’s attention,” said Cecile Richards, the president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, because it is so simple and “so stunning.” Richards said that her 17-year-old daughter read it “and personalized it, and said, ‘There are some girls I know who have an STI’ ”—shorthand for sexually transmitted infection. “It really brought it home.”

Rival Washington advocates pounced on the CDC’s startling statistic. One faction, led by Planned Parenthood and other groups that get federal grants, said the number shows that the Bush administration’s abstinence-promotion programs don’t work and that funding should be transferred to sex-education and condom-distribution programs. The rival faction, led by social conservatives, said that the one-in-four number demonstrates the failure of condoms and sex-education classes.

An April 23 hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee showcased this dispute.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: medialies; promiscuity; std; stds; teenagers
.
1 posted on 06/03/2008 1:39:05 PM PDT by forkinsocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Haven’t they been pushing the condom safe sex message for 20 years now? Didn’t that message penetrate the young people?


2 posted on 06/03/2008 1:43:36 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

My wife checked this out when it first came out and said most of it was HPV and didn’t really buy off on it. I think the CDC is trolling for more money myself. There’s nothing like a crisis to drum up some money, isn’t that right? (Think globull warming.)


3 posted on 06/03/2008 1:44:30 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

“One faction, led by Planned Parenthood and other groups that get federal grants, said the number shows that the Bush administration’s abstinence-promotion programs don’t work”

No, they work. Problem is they’re not followed.


4 posted on 06/03/2008 1:44:41 PM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
From the Article: "The four mini-surveys were combined, and CDC officials determined that 25.7 percent of the 615 women had one or more of the four diseases, according to a CDC briefing chart."

25% is just about 1 out of four by my math. Sample size is too small to be valid, though.

5 posted on 06/03/2008 1:46:21 PM PDT by CholeraJoe (Skirting the line between rakishly charming and frighteningly maniacal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

How many dudes have sexually transmitted infections? Why is this not being reported on? How are the girls getting these infections?

It’s funny to see the reactions. The abstinence/conservative group says that the 1 in 4 number indicates that the condom safe sex message hasn’t worked. The liberal group says that this shows that not enough has been done to get the message out there. Interesting........


6 posted on 06/03/2008 1:46:49 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
From the CDC director:

… we pride ourselves in following three core values—accountability, respect, and integrity.

Strike one, strike two, strike three... you're out!

7 posted on 06/03/2008 1:48:31 PM PDT by Flycatcher (Strong copy for a strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

NO. Tell me it ain’t so......
A Government Study that is portrayed inaccurately and may not even be accurate itself ?
How is this possible. How could we ever trust the Government and the media again ?


8 posted on 06/03/2008 1:50:48 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Patriot Guard Riders - Standing for those that stood for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Why was it just GIRLS that had the diseases??? The boys are NEVER mentioned as having any....wonder why?


9 posted on 06/03/2008 1:50:53 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
I trust nothing the CDC reports.

All this bull is based on their underhanded efforts to force the HPV Vaccine on our little girls.

Who by the way WILL have sex. So our dear leaders MUST teach them that abstinence is a silly religious (bad!) superstition and that they are entitle to free condoms - followed up later with free abortions.

10 posted on 06/03/2008 1:51:47 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Yo prometo lealtad a la bandera de los Estados Unidos de America, y a la Republica que representa...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
Quote from the article:

Abstinence-until-marriage programs nearly always fail because, surveys show, 95 percent of people have sex before marriage. --Heather Boonstra, Guttmacher Institute

If that 95% only sleep with one or two people whom they know well and wait until their 17 or 18 instead of 14 or 15, I'd say it's well worth it.

11 posted on 06/03/2008 1:52:31 PM PDT by lesser_satan (Cthulu '08! Why vote for the lesser evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
their=they're

I'm my own grammar-nazi.

12 posted on 06/03/2008 1:55:30 PM PDT by lesser_satan (Cthulu '08! Why vote for the lesser evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Nice choice of words...


13 posted on 06/03/2008 1:56:13 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

No, but something else did.


14 posted on 06/03/2008 1:57:29 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Must be a lot of angry lesbians out there spreading STDs, I guess.

Seriously, you aren't the only one to wonder that. There seems to be a big push to force all girls to get vaccinated. I think it would be more effective to get the tom cats who can't control themselves neutered.

15 posted on 06/03/2008 2:01:45 PM PDT by Vigilanteman ((Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

“...said the number shows that the Bush administration’s abstinence-promotion programs don’t work”

— Under Bush....abstinence ‘didn’t work.” Under a liberal... no one works.


16 posted on 06/03/2008 2:12:18 PM PDT by Operation_Shock_N_Awe (Government that can do anything for you; can do anything TO you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
How many dudes have sexually transmitted infections? Why is this not being reported on? How are the girls getting these infections?

It’s funny to see the reactions. The abstinence/conservative group says that the 1 in 4 number indicates that the condom safe sex message hasn’t worked. The liberal group says that this shows that not enough has been done to get the message out there. Interesting........


First, there are no good simple cheap tests for HPV, and there are no male symptoms, so we don't really know how many teenage boys have HPV.

Second, The dirty little secret here is that HPV is not passed by fluids - it is a virus that is is passed by contact between male scrotum and female external genitalia. And HPV infection rates, male and female, are substantially larger than for other STDs.

So ... indoctronate kids that condom sex is safer ...and even if they DO use a condom, they will pass HPV.

Conclusion: Advocating use of a condom to prevent other STDs results in higher incidences of HPV.

17 posted on 06/03/2008 2:18:28 PM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy; Vigilanteman; forkinsocket
Why was it just GIRLS that had the diseases??? The boys are NEVER mentioned as having any....wonder why?

Because in quite a few cases it isn't boys in their own age group but men in their 20's and 30's that they're sleeping with.

18 posted on 06/03/2008 3:11:50 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (1984 was supposed to be a warning not an instruction manual!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak
"HPV kills, because the E6 and E7 varieties cause cervical cancer. In 1999, it was, "estimated that about ten million American women-most of them in their late teens and twenties-have active infections. A million of them have diseased, and perhaps precancerous, tissue as a result. About eighty thousand have early cervical cancer that is still contained within the inner lining of the tissue. Some sixteen thousand have cancer that has invaded the cervix more deeply, and each year about five thousand of those will die."

Contagion: Papilloma Virus

Hank

19 posted on 06/03/2008 3:57:13 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson