Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama clinches Democratic nomination
Associated Press ^ | 06/03/2008 | DAVID ESPO and STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

Posted on 06/03/2008 1:24:42 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998

WASHINGTON (AP) - Barack Obama effectively clinched the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday, based on an Associated Press tally of convention delegates, becoming the first black candidate ever to lead his party into a fall campaign for the White House.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Montana; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: 2008dncconvention; election; hillary; mt2008; obama; operationchaos; primary; sd2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: freedomwarrior998
McCain can and will defeat Obama. He never had a chance against Hitlery.

I see it the other way around. McCain had a chance against Hillary, against Obama? No.

21 posted on 06/03/2008 1:30:55 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cll
Sounds like the AP has a case of Premature Enunciation!
22 posted on 06/03/2008 1:31:06 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
There is no way that Obama can make up for almost guaranteed losses in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Hitlery would have carried all three, and thus the Presidency.

23 posted on 06/03/2008 1:31:53 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

“Effectively clinching” is not clinching, which requires attaining a prescribed number of pledged delegates. Until the convention the superdelegates are free to change their minds as often as they like.


24 posted on 06/03/2008 1:31:53 PM PDT by Tea in the Harbor (Diplomacy is the art of fishing tranquilly in troubled waters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Ain’t nothing clinched until the delegates have their say at the Convention. How the delegates feel on June 3 2008 means nothing.

Ha! So true! I have this vision of Hillary morphing into a huge evil monster form at the convention and zapping people.

25 posted on 06/03/2008 1:32:43 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Don’t count “The Witch” out since her strategy is to hang herself around Obama’s neck as VP.

Beyond that, Obama’s mother is white so doesn’t that accurately make him “mixed race.”


26 posted on 06/03/2008 1:32:43 PM PDT by Nextrush (MCCAIN, OBAMA, CLINTON......WHAT A CHOICE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

He may but hasn’t yet secured the nomination. Sloppy reporting but no surprise there.


27 posted on 06/03/2008 1:33:12 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

We will never know for sure, but think McCain has a better chance against Obama.


28 posted on 06/03/2008 1:33:31 PM PDT by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: acoulterfan
So AP did have it right?

AP isn't known for being accurate or honest. Keep the champagne on ice for a few hours more...

29 posted on 06/03/2008 1:34:05 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

I hate to lick the red off your candy cane, but the superdelegates don’t actually count until they VOTE at the convention. She can still flip them.


30 posted on 06/03/2008 1:34:13 PM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
31 posted on 06/03/2008 1:35:19 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

So, Obama finally bought the support of enough super delegates.


32 posted on 06/03/2008 1:35:51 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Look back to the Bush/Gore election.

Most conservatives and Republicans were gung-ho for Bush then, and Gore was the unlikeable boring one.

Now we have McCain, who is not liked by many conservatives, and we have Obama, who has a huge energized following.

I’ll stick with my opinion (because I think I’m right) :)


33 posted on 06/03/2008 1:36:16 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL
I think we can know for sure. Appalachia HATES Obama. Appalachia includes Southern and Eastern Ohio, South Western and Middle Pennsylvania.

There is no way that Philadelphia and Cleveland overcome the margins that McCain is going to run up in the Appalachian portions of those states.

Without Pennsylvania and Ohio, Obama loses.

34 posted on 06/03/2008 1:36:17 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
The MSM is desperate to declare for Obama. After that, it's Obama + MSM + Unions + 527’s + Europe and the Middle East vs McCain + RINO’s + Disgruntled Hillary voters + moderate Democrats.
35 posted on 06/03/2008 1:37:11 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLI
Golly, what happend to “Count every vote?”

What happened to wait until the polls close???
36 posted on 06/03/2008 1:37:10 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

37 posted on 06/03/2008 1:37:39 PM PDT by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

“I think she’s still not going to let Obama have tonite due to her sick sociopathic tendencies.”

But she is right. the so-called “pledged” superdelegates are not really so bound.

BTW, how do we know they are “pledged” - and how strongly?


38 posted on 06/03/2008 1:37:57 PM PDT by Shermy (Nightmares From My Pastor (and Pfleger!), A Story of Race and Insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

+ “youth vote”


39 posted on 06/03/2008 1:38:55 PM PDT by Shermy (Nightmares From My Pastor (and Pfleger!), A Story of Race and Insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tea in the Harbor
Until the convention the superdelegates are free to change their minds as often as they like.

Exactly right. What I find ironic is that whole concept of the superdelegate is to make sure that the Democrats have the capabality -- right up to the last minute! -- of changing their mind and saving themselves from a candidate who has suddenly become unelectable.

The DNC understands the purpose of the superdelegates.
The media understands the purpose of the superdelegates.

But it suits their purpose (today) to slap their hands together and say "Game Over!"

But they know it's not.

40 posted on 06/03/2008 1:38:56 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson