Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

GD right it does.


2 posted on 06/03/2008 10:47:29 AM PDT by wastedyears (Like a bat outta Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastedyears

And I wonder how many of those polled would know that the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution is there to protect individual rights against government infringement?

Just because these folks don’t know this does not mean it is not true.

Therefore the 2A is, by definition, protecting individual rights.


9 posted on 06/03/2008 10:58:44 AM PDT by MtnClimber (Stalin, Mao, Castro, Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wastedyears
The right to self protection AND HUNTING supercedes the constitution.

Many soldiers were given their "militia supply" guns "as gifts" (a sort of pay) after the revolutionary war ended. I have a copy of a letter (GWashington I believe) and it is very explicit.

Had it been that only militias were to have arms...they would have been returned to the "militia supply".

36 posted on 06/03/2008 12:07:10 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wastedyears

No it doesn’t. It just enumerates that right. The right itself is inalienable. The government cannot grant it or take it away.


43 posted on 06/03/2008 1:47:13 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson