To: pissant
If these figures are accurate, it indicates Obama may actually be in
more trouble than generally thought. Demographically, South Dakota is a near twin to North Dakota, which Obama won 61-37 on Super Tuesday. The black population is practically nil and most Dakotans, if they know a black person at all, it is the nice professor at the local college, the exchange student athelete on the football team or the clean-cut patriotic young man serving at the local air force base.
Racial tensions are about as near to zero as you can get. I grew up among these people. We can dismiss the rantings of Rev. Wright as mere theatrics. Some of us may have actually even caucused for Obama because we loathe the Clintons so much.
If Obama loses both South Dakota and Montana by big margins, is isn't going to make much of a difference in delegates, because they have so few. But it is going to undermine a key argument that he's bringing states into play where Democrats have been unable to compete.
7 posted on
06/02/2008 12:08:30 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
((Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud))
To: Vigilanteman
A couple observations from the SD's largest city:
It seems that yard signs run about 65-35 Hillary. Ron Paul signs outnumber both.
Obama is spending a lot of money on media. Tom Daschle drones on about how Obama is "change we can believe in". Hillary's commercials tout her plan for fiscal responsibility, and how we "can't keep borrowing from the Chinese to pay the Saudis for oil". Both seem to be running against Bush as they cite him in their ads.
The city's paper apparently endorsed Hillary even though two weeks ago its editorial board was saying she should drop out.
18 posted on
06/02/2008 12:23:09 PM PDT by
philled
("I prefer messy democracy to the stability of tyrants." -- Howar Ziad, Iraqi Ambassador to Canada)
To: Vigilanteman
Yesterday on the Sunday Panel, Byron York said that Barry was losing altitude and Juan Williams said he was wheezing toward the finish line.
20 posted on
06/02/2008 12:25:16 PM PDT by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Vigilanteman
Voting for any Democrat is unthinkable unless you want to turn this country over to radical Islam, have the country go bankrupt because of sky-high fuel prices and economic idiots.
To: Vigilanteman
Demographically, South Dakota is a near twin to North Dakota, which Obama won 61-37 on Super Tuesday. Yes, but the bloom was not off the rose when South Dakata voted. Now the rose, is ROTTING.
To: Vigilanteman
This is bigger than SD/ND it's the whole freakin' region! BHO OWNED that part of our Republic (@ least for D's)

BHO's lead in MT is down to 4% from 17% two weeks ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries%2C_2008#Montana
Most states north Oklahoma and west of Missouri held caucuses in which BHO did great, but the only state in that region to hold a primary since the rev wright revelation is Oregon. Eggheads still go for BHO but working class (D)'s reject him now.
50 posted on
06/02/2008 2:24:15 PM PDT by
TeleStraightShooter
(What value does Black Liberation Theology hold in a post racial Republic?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson