Skip to comments.
Rasmussen Conneticut: Obama 47, McCain 44
Rasmussen ^
Posted on 06/02/2008 8:38:59 AM PDT by wsjreader
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
06/02/2008 8:38:59 AM PDT
by
wsjreader
To: wsjreader
Are we surprised?..............
2
posted on
06/02/2008 8:41:07 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(NOBODY MOVE!!!!.......I dropped me brain............................)
To: Red Badger
Are we surprised?.............. Although CT isn't quite as "blue" as the rest of New England you'd expect Osama to have a wider lead than he seems to have.
3
posted on
06/02/2008 8:43:10 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Will the dancing Hitlers please wait in the wings? We're only seeing singing Hitlers.)
To: wsjreader
These results are why I’m afraid that McCain will pick Joe Lieberman to be his running mate. Joe would pull Connecticut to McCain along with New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and possibly Maryland.
To: Gay State Conservative
At this point in time, polls are nearly worthless.............
5
posted on
06/02/2008 8:46:30 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(NOBODY MOVE!!!!.......I dropped me brain............................)
To: Red Badger
exactly...wait for the tape
To: Red Badger; Blue Turtle
"...polls are nearly worthless..." Not to the poll takers. They put these things out one a week for months on end. Every one of them is a payday for the taker. Somebody's gotta be buying them too-even though they are worthless.
What would Britt Hume and the rest of the talking heads talk about if they couldn't pretend that this stuff was important?
7
posted on
06/02/2008 9:03:55 AM PDT
by
skimbell
To: wsjreader
The more people get to know this goon named Obama, the faster his percentages drop.
Nam Vet
8
posted on
06/02/2008 9:04:10 AM PDT
by
Nam Vet
("Erin Go Bragh", declares Democrat hopeful Barry Finnegan O'Bama)
To: Blue Turtle
WOW! I'm surprise McWIMP is going well there! After Saturday's debacle I'm wondering if perhaps this is an indication of those pissed off gray hair liberal hippies leaning towards Mr. McApologize.
To: Gay State Conservative
Fauxbama will not even be close nationally if he is the democratic candidate.
While he will not lose the electoral college as badly as McGovern and Mondale.. he will lose the popular vote by an equivalent margin. He’ll be lucky if he sees 40% of the popular vote.
To: wsjreader
Oh crap. I may have to vote for McCain then. I thought my vote wouldn't count and I could vote for Fred.
11
posted on
06/02/2008 9:08:36 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Et tu, McClellan.)
To: wsjreader
Add the bradley factor and all the crap we will have on barack curious george mcgovern, then mix in lieberman’s working for his revenge and McCain walks away with the Nutmeg State by at least 55/45. That will help nail down all of New England except the socialist state of vermont, which would vote for fidel for president.
12
posted on
06/02/2008 9:14:50 AM PDT
by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatives live in the truth. Liberals live in lies.)
To: wsjreader
It’s time for all conservatives to jump the boat and vote for Bob Barr. Nuff said.
To: TitansAFC; meandog; onyx; MARTIAL MONK; GulfBreeze; Kuksool; freespirited; Salvation; furquhart; ...
The McCain List.
Getting awfully close for Obama in a dyed-in-the-wool "safe" New England state.
Connecticut (Rasmussen)
Obama 47%
McCain 44%
Favorable rating
Obama 57%
McCain 54%
14
posted on
06/02/2008 9:30:29 AM PDT
by
Norman Bates
(Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
To: Clintonfatigued
A lot closer than I expected!
15
posted on
06/02/2008 9:32:26 AM PDT
by
Norman Bates
(Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
To: wsjreader
Considering the Bradley-Wilder effect -- McCain might be even or slightly ahead. With a "recession" and $4 gasoline. Amazing.
The big question is -- do libs lie to an automated pollster as much as they do to a live pollster?
16
posted on
06/02/2008 9:39:58 AM PDT
by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: Sooth2222
The big question is — do libs lie? YES they do.
The Bradley effect is likely, IMO, very significant in CT. I call Ct for McCain, FWIW.
17
posted on
06/02/2008 9:50:05 AM PDT
by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: Norman Bates
This may soak up some of those excess campaign dollars that Bamer has.
18
posted on
06/02/2008 9:51:34 AM PDT
by
MARTIAL MONK
(I'm waiting for the POP!)
To: iopscusa
I wonder what percentage of people lied when saying that they would vote for Obama.
Many white democrats won’t vote for a black guy. Some will at the last minute, stay home or vote for McCain.
McCain can win CT w/o Lieberman on the ticket.
19
posted on
06/02/2008 10:08:37 AM PDT
by
proudpapa
(McCain-Pawlenty '08)
To: Dogbert41
20
posted on
06/02/2008 10:14:41 AM PDT
by
Stentor
(I tell you one and one makes three. IÂ’m the cult of personality".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson