Skip to comments.
UAV Sniper
Sagetech ^
Posted on 06/02/2008 4:20:29 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: LibWhacker
unbelieveable! You can run but you’ll just die tired.
41
posted on
06/02/2008 9:53:42 AM PDT
by
wildbill
To: CodeToad
Yeah, but they can keep shooting til they get it right.
42
posted on
06/02/2008 9:55:15 AM PDT
by
wildbill
To: Travis McGee
"But I fear the day that it is used in America, by a government gone totalitarian." If our "government" goes "totalitarian" --- they would have a few thing to fear themselves..
This is NOT Zimbabwe..
10s of millions of armed citizens..
Millions of TRAINED veterans of combat.
All veterans are STILL under their oath of service, to DEFEND the Constitution against ALL enemies - both foreign and domestic.
A Constitution which authorizes Defense of that Constitution.
A "totalitarian" government would need a hell of a lot more that a few unmanned drones and battalions of Code Pink or Boobs not Bombs babes to make it stick...
We have both the arms and the Constitution on OUR side.
And, more than enough pissed off folks, eager to take action....
43
posted on
06/02/2008 10:14:04 AM PDT
by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Travis McGee
If this is ever used in the USA, those guys are going to have to live in those control stations on closed bases 24/7 forever. They wont be able to walk across the Target parking lot.
This is the first thing I thought of too. On the other hand, I'm very surprised Hariuchi is still walking around.
44
posted on
06/02/2008 10:41:58 AM PDT
by
kitchen
(Any day without a fair tax thread is a good day.)
To: LibWhacker
Sweet.
Looks like the jihadis are going to start becoming more and more scarce as they loose the ability to find cover amongst women and children.
Now if they can just develop a multiple target engagement system that can track and engage 4-5 of these animals as they scurry for cover, then the war will essentially be over.
A team of loitering UAVs with mixed rifle/missile loadouts and nothing moves without permission.
45
posted on
06/02/2008 10:47:26 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
To: river rat
If there is a new Great Depression, 2/3 of Americans will DEMAND what amounts to martial law to “fix the problem now!”
Those who don’t go along with mandatory rationing, wage price and rent controls etc, will be branded economic sabateurs and enemies of the people. 2/3 of Americans will support govt. steps to crack down on these “outlaws.”
I’m not saying it will be a cakewalk either way, because as you said, millions of us are armed and would fight to defend the “old” constitution.
That’s why I pinged the CW2 list: it would be a scrap.
46
posted on
06/02/2008 10:58:49 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: kitchen
I wonder what goes through Hooch’s mind when he walks across the Target parking lot.
47
posted on
06/02/2008 10:59:47 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Travis McGee
If there is a new Great Depression, 2/3 of Americans will DEMAND what amounts to martial law to fix the problem now!
I don't know if 2/3 would demand martial law, but I certainly believe that 2/3 would accept martial law. But that's always the way it is. In the American Revolution, only about 1/3 of the population rebelled. The rest were either neutral or actively supported the British. I would expect the same ration this time around. However, a properly motivated 1/3 can kick the crap out of the other 2/3 no problem.
48
posted on
06/02/2008 11:16:38 AM PDT
by
fr_freak
(So foul a sky clears not without a storm.)
To: All
Remember folks, this is the technology the democrats said could never work in the SDI of Ronald Reagan in the 1080s.
49
posted on
06/02/2008 11:24:23 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: fr_freak
That motivated 1/3 could be up against some brutal tools of control, such as “brilliant data mining” to come up with the most likey enemies of the state, followed by a Sniper UAV.
It would not be quick or easy. I read what both Yanks and Rebels said circa April 1961: the war would be over by the end of summer.
50
posted on
06/02/2008 11:26:58 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Travis McGee
Whoops-—off by a mere century.
51
posted on
06/02/2008 11:27:29 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: longtermmemmory
This is not “hit a bullet with a bullet.” (Star Wars)
This is just “hit a regular old man with a regular old bullet from a new platform.”
52
posted on
06/02/2008 11:28:55 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Travis McGee; Squantos; Dog
Why not arm a UCAV with a machine gun? What’s the impetus or advantage for sniper shots from the sky?
53
posted on
06/02/2008 11:30:47 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Travis McGee
I wonder what goes through Hoochs mind when he walks across the Target parking lot.
Odds are good the murderer looks nothing like he did when he killed Vicky Weaver.
Gain weight, change hair, glasses, grow a beard, it's easy to become invisible if you don't mind a bit of work.
So I'd say he feels fairly safe, which is a shame, a damned terrible shame...
54
posted on
06/02/2008 11:34:11 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
To: Southack
Whats the impetus or advantage for sniper shots from the sky?
There's no stomach for collateral damage anymore. A machine gun would be no more discriminating than a Hellfire missile.
With a sniper rifle, you can pop mohammed while he's accepting a cup of tea from his slave...er...wife and not even disturb her veil.
55
posted on
06/02/2008 11:36:53 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
To: Dr.Zoidberg
"There's no stomach for collateral damage anymore." That's hardly a government to fear, then.
56
posted on
06/02/2008 11:39:18 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
That's hardly a government to fear, then.
I think you'll find that there's a world of difference between dealing with enemies, killing their wives and children when you're dropping 500lb bombs during wartime and suppressing "home grown terrorists" who are resisting law enforcement efforts to "protect the public" from far right wing militia types".
How something is packaged and fed to the public has everything to do with how they react.
57
posted on
06/02/2008 11:47:08 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
To: Dr.Zoidberg
You will have more moslem men in burkas, more with veils (oops scarfs over face), more wide brimmed hats, more crowds with everyone wearing the same thing.
The visual equivalent of chaff.
then again one tiny rfid chip and suddenly it is not an issue.
Don’t forget we also now have tactical lasers. Soon they will be much smaller instead of artilary scaled as with all tech. (ie bell cannons- muskets-pistols)
These molsem terrorists will have to keep significant distance from anything with a microchip.
58
posted on
06/02/2008 12:05:18 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
Heh, it’s going to be interesting to see how many more mohammedan women start showing up in villages where they were in short number before.
This might just have the unintended consequence of driving women out of the veil and into mens clothing to create false targets while the burka clad cowards hide in basements.
As long as it results in fear and confusion to the enemy, I’m all for it.
59
posted on
06/02/2008 12:13:47 PM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
To: longtermmemmory
And I can’t wait until energy weapons/lasers become man portable.
They may be forbidden to civilians, but once the tech gets into the wild(and it will, you can’t put a genie back once the bottle is opened) personal lasers will become available if expensive.
And Han will indeed shoot first. =-)
60
posted on
06/02/2008 12:17:16 PM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson