To kill a chance for property rights protection by including it in Prop 98 was very stupid.
That’s the second time that a poison pill was included to such a referendum. Imagine that! Wait. It’s not fiction.
In each instance the question’s writers somehow failed to consider the interests of the entirety of the voters. Once maybe was stupid. What should one make of twice? That thrice is has a high likelihood.
The fly in the ointment with “Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity” is the word “Never.”