Posted on 05/31/2008 5:59:11 PM PDT by Kackikat
OBAMA hijacks Media at exact point millions would be waiting for WALLACE SPECIAL ON CONGRESS USE OF EARMARKS ON FOX NEWS. What is wrong with the news media that they allow a CANDIDATE for a Nomination, and NOT a PRESIDENT to hijack their news media channel when millions are wanting to see the illegal use of their tax dollars for EARMARKS that benefit congressmen/women. Now people had prepared for 8 PM to hear Wallace Special, so OBAMA picks that very time to make a statement about resigning his church...THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS to give Obama an advantage to the viewers at that particular time...It was done intentionally by Obama to promote himself as a christian, to try and get votes from evangelicals by being a cameleon, because many do not know about BLT.
By sucking up this prominant time on Saturday night, where he knows most conservatives will be watching, it gives him an opportunity to try and siphon off McCain votes pretending to be someone who is christian and is "traditional" was his words...there is nothing traditional about a black Jesus, and hating whites. This media is such a disappointment.
I don’t want Obama elected...so why are you attacking me?
I saw it, or most of it,...it didn’t come on here until 10 pm after Hannity. Yes, it was a little choppy...I got in late and saw two Republicans and One democrat on their earmarks...and I must say the Democrat from Penna was the real criminal, for the 9 million he got for his family; and they went bankrupt and didn’t have to pay the bills of 1.5 million according to some judge, that their company owed at time of bankruptcy...a total of 10.5 million loss...9 million of it taxpayers dollars.
The road Hastart proposed and the land he bought (adjoining his property)..that was a little iffy. If land came up for sale next to my property I might buy it. The road should have been noted it would benefit him personally...REP or Dem...I am against earmarks, period.
I think Communities should apply for grants, and the rep for that area abstain from it on conflict of interest...when it is millions.
The real message was about the guy that is in congress now opposed to earmarks, and although he was a more senior member, it kept him off the committee on earmarks...fishy.
OH BOY!
Am I embarrassed or what?
I watched the whole deal at 10:00 PM EST.
They all need to be shot.
As someone said last night..
“No Incumbents..Good for Every Voter”
I am Paraphrasing. It was a great bumper sticker, cannot give credit where credit is due.
If I don’t go to sleep now, this whole spot will lose function!
Horreur!
I wasn’t attacking you.
I apologize, after hole_in_one attacked me, the whole sarcasm escaped me...
The earmark issue is very important due to fact that many dems use this method to get their districts millions in tax payers money. McCain plans to oppose earmarks, but Clinton and Obama both use earmarks...and where that money ends up is critical to US future. ex: San Francisco, so much of our money went to those non profits promoting alternate lifestyles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.