Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pentagon's Ray Gun - David Martin Reports On A Non-Lethal Weapon Straight Out Of Buck Rogers
CBS 60 Minutes ^ | May 30, 2008 | NA

Posted on 05/31/2008 12:29:06 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

CBS
1 posted on 05/31/2008 12:29:07 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IncPen

ping

If they need good proving ground, should take it to denver for the convention


2 posted on 05/31/2008 1:34:41 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
David Martin is always late to the party.

New non-lethal weapon lets troops microwave hostile crowds 3 February 2005

3 posted on 05/31/2008 1:35:42 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
old stuff -but cool
4 posted on 05/31/2008 1:38:05 AM PDT by robomatik ((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Pentagon officials call it a major breakthrough which could change the rules of war and save huge numbers of lives in Iraq."

Why would they want to do THAT?

5 posted on 05/31/2008 2:27:40 AM PDT by FixitGuy (By their fruits shall ye know them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Hmm... looks like ‘tinfoil’ was an idea ahead of its time. I suspect this could be pretty easily countered, maybe by something as simple as wearing wet clothes.


6 posted on 05/31/2008 2:30:24 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That because in the middle of a war, the military just can't bring itself to trust a weapon that doesn't kill.

The "ray gun" is no more a weapon than is a water canon. It's not a weapon of war. It would discourage people from rushing a gate or a building, or in a riot control situation. It even made Sue Payton giggle.

7 posted on 05/31/2008 2:33:23 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They can loan it to the Denver cops for the Dem convention.


8 posted on 05/31/2008 2:53:26 AM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Victory in Iraq: Worst defeat for activist media since Goebbels shot himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

“’That because in the middle of a war, the military just can’t bring itself to trust a weapon that doesn’t kill.’

The “ray gun” is no more a weapon than is a water canon. It’s not a weapon of war. It would discourage people from rushing a gate or a building, or in a riot control situation. It even made Sue Payton giggle.”

So, we shoot the giggles out of little Haji now? Good luck with that.


9 posted on 05/31/2008 2:56:56 AM PDT by combat_boots (She lives! 22 weeks, 9.5 inches. Go, baby, go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Grut
"Hmm... looks like ‘tinfoil’ was an idea ahead of its time. I suspect this could be pretty easily countered, maybe by something as simple as wearing wet clothes."

Since this is just the effect of a microwave oven, I suspect that "wearing wet clothes" would result in severe burns, as the water traps the heat next to the skin. Two layers of clothes with aluminum foil between is more likely to work.

10 posted on 05/31/2008 3:46:47 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yeah, but when will they be able to pull the trigger on a water-boarding ray?


11 posted on 05/31/2008 3:53:07 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

In a war anyone pointing an RPG or weapon at me deserves to die. They do not deserve a good giggle.


12 posted on 05/31/2008 4:15:20 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Pentagon officials call it a major breakthrough which could change the rules of war and save huge numbers of lives in Iraq. But it's still not there. That because in the middle of a war, the military just can't bring itself to trust a weapon that doesn't kill.

Let me ask some obvious questions. Save huge numbers of lives in Iraq? Whose lives? I don’t see how a weapon like this saves our soldiers lives. And what is the point of having a weapon that only temporarily incapacitates the enemy with no lasting physical harm to them, leaving them to live and fight and put our soldiers in harms way on yet another day?

"It's very difficult to make a case for a humanitarian operation if the only way you have of imposing your will is by killing the people you’re sent to protect," Heal says.

This is a wrong and misguided on several points. When anyone attacks our troops, they automatically become hostile enemy combatants and putting them down permanently is the only reasonable option.

And our military is charged with defending and protecting our country from hostile military threats posed by other nations. That’s their job, what they are trained to do and they do it very well. They are not trained (and should not be trained) to be humanitarian aid workers.

As General George Patton once said - No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
13 posted on 05/31/2008 4:37:19 AM PDT by Caramelgal (Rely on the spirit and meaning of the teachings, not on the words or superficial interpretations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

>> We have war fighters that are in harm’s way and you know they don’t want to kill innocent people

I’m doubtful about the value of this device in war.

But I have no doubt at all that local LEO groups are chomping at the bit to have this. As law enforcement continues to move up the nanny-state spectrum from crime control towards total behavior and thought control of the citizenry, weapons like this will be of immense value to them.

They can mount them on the “bradley fighting vehicles” they also crave for their arsenals.


14 posted on 05/31/2008 5:24:07 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (La Raza hates white folks. And John McCain loves La Raza!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Best friggin non-lethal weapon would be one that can beam energy into the attackers brains causing them permanent amnesia, they would forget their very reason of what to do, they would forget their religion, military training and all hostile intentions.


15 posted on 05/31/2008 5:51:11 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (The world WILL be cleaner, safer and more productive without Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal

AMEN! Some people just need killin’! Why would we want to spare an unrepentant terrorist?


16 posted on 05/31/2008 5:55:47 AM PDT by 70th Division (If we lose the Republic we have lost it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Just look right here.
17 posted on 05/31/2008 5:58:22 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
it's that flat dish antenna which shoots out a 100,000-watt beam at the speed of light, hitting any thing in its path with an intense blast of heat.

Isn't it actually just the sensation of being hit by an intense blast of heat?

..the gun, when fired emits a flash of white hot energy - an electromagnetic beam made up of very high frequency radio waves.

If I held up a large mirror, would it reflect these radio waves right back toward the gun?

18 posted on 05/31/2008 6:05:47 AM PDT by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
. . . the Marine Corps’ idea of force escalation went from M-16 to F-16. How many people we could kill and how fast we could do it."

Meant as a criticism but sounds like ad copy for a recruiting poster! Semper Fi.

~Marine Mom-To-Be

19 posted on 05/31/2008 6:30:14 AM PDT by ottbmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

You might try putting a piece of tinfoil in your microwave for a few seconds before you field test your idea personally. The sparks and smoking between your clothing layers might prove to be a bit distracting even if you don’t feel the heat.


20 posted on 05/31/2008 7:13:53 AM PDT by 3Lean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson