Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ultra Stealth (New USAF bomber?)
AVIATION WEEK ^ | May 26, 2008 | Bill Sweetman

Posted on 05/30/2008 12:13:36 PM PDT by decimon

NGB demonstrator may be a twin-engine aircraft resembling an X-47B. Initial version will be piloted, but an unmanned endurance version is a probable follow-on.

Is Northrop Grumman building a secret bomber prototype? In late April, the company revealed first-quarter financial results. Data indicated $2 billion in new "restricted programs" contract awards at Integrated Systems, the aircraft division. This almost certainly confirms what DTI first reported earlier this year: Northrop Grumman has a classified, sole-source contract to build a demonstrator for the U.S. Air Force's Next-Generation Bomber (DTI March, p. 30).

(Excerpt) Read more at aviationweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: miltech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 05/30/2008 12:13:36 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Stealth ping.


2 posted on 05/30/2008 12:14:52 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

3 posted on 05/30/2008 12:15:48 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Too bad there aren’t like 3 dozen of these ready for Iran.


4 posted on 05/30/2008 12:17:49 PM PDT by WarToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Who built this craft?


5 posted on 05/30/2008 12:19:38 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
I hope it is simple and easy to manufacture.

We do not need a 2 billion dollar bird. Now I know that was Congress fault for not building the original 120ish B-2's.

We only have what 60 something B-1's left? And the Buffs are getting way to long in the tooth.

We need quantity IMHO on this one.

6 posted on 05/30/2008 12:20:23 PM PDT by taildragger (The Answer is Fred Thompson, I do not care what the question is.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yeah, they said that is the X-47B, base for the claimed new bomber.


7 posted on 05/30/2008 12:21:23 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon
You can already buy a scale model of it. I got one for my kid to assemble, pictured below:


8 posted on 05/30/2008 12:22:03 PM PDT by Damifino (The true measure of a man is found in what he would do if he knew no one would ever find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Who built this craft?

That Pellman guy? For his ETs?

9 posted on 05/30/2008 12:22:49 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Damifino

Dang, that’s really stealthy.


10 posted on 05/30/2008 12:24:02 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WarToad

Bird brain Pelosi will stand on her head to make sure that day never dawns!


11 posted on 05/30/2008 12:24:34 PM PDT by SMARTY ('At some point you get tired of swatting flies, and you have to go for the manure heap' Gen. LeMay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Damifino

Looks a bit like a B-2.


12 posted on 05/30/2008 12:24:52 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

We need a bunch of remotely piloted craft, each with a moderate payload, (relatively) cheap to build.

Seat the “pilots” in some high flying AWACS out of “theatre” range,

and blow up some ragheads.


13 posted on 05/30/2008 12:25:31 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Probably the guy holding & waving it on the other side of that dirty window.


14 posted on 05/30/2008 12:26:45 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Yeah, I hadn’t considered that possibility!


15 posted on 05/30/2008 12:26:55 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Damifino

Per #8; Man, Revelle’s packageing sure has gone down hill.


16 posted on 05/30/2008 12:27:44 PM PDT by fella (Is he or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: decimon

So when are we going to employ anti-matter drives?


17 posted on 05/30/2008 12:28:12 PM PDT by wastedyears (Like a bat outta Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Yo-Yo Dyne Propulsion Systems.


18 posted on 05/30/2008 12:28:37 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Damifino

Now that’s funny.


19 posted on 05/30/2008 12:28:58 PM PDT by KingLudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
See Post #15...
20 posted on 05/30/2008 12:29:34 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson