Posted on 05/29/2008 4:05:30 PM PDT by Fred
[He is a priest not a Bishop.]
Is that a ring on his left hand?
“Fr. Pfleger has the Cardinal George by the testicles because he is afraid of a great uproar and schism in the church.”
Only a Bishop can lead a schism; and it will only continue if the bishop ordains priests to serve the new schismatic church.
His speech reflected the thinking of Robert Mugabe, and his manner - the tone of voice, the histrionics, the handkerchief - was largely an imitation of Farrakhan. And it was obvious from the get-go that this sort of thing is standard fare at that church, and that Obama is therefore lying through his teeth when he says he is offended by those ideas. He lived and breathed those ideas for 20 years. The more people who see tapes like this, the more Obama’s chances will melt away.
Hey, cut the guy some slack. Obama might've snoozed thru the sermons.
But one thing's for sure: Michelle didn't.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
I will bet anyone that this psycho is a Cardinal Bernadin protege. Anyone know the scoop?
Last year, Father Flakey harangued an anti-gun mob outside of a Chicago-area gun shop that Anti-gun tyrant Mayor Daley has been trying to shut down via intimidation and fear.
Amongst other hysterical rhetorical outbursts, Flakey said that the law abiding gun shop owner should be dragged like a rat from his shop and “snuffed” along with any Illinois legislators who would not vote for the anti-gun legislation. If someone can give me a good free site for audio uploads, I will post the audio clip for you to hear.
This fool may be a clown, but he is also a demagogue and potentially too dangerous to be undisciplined by the Archdiocese.
As a Baptist I feel that's a bit of cheap shot. Any denomination can have a runaway kook in the pulpit. The test will be whether the Catholic leadership takes steps to deal with this. After what they went through with the child molesting scandel I would think they should be very quick to deal with a rogue Priest.
Why is people so upset, did he NOT told the plain truth, nothing but the truth???
Perhaps my choice of the work Schism might not be appropriate but the intent of my comment is that Cardinal George is afraid that if withdraws Phleger’s Faculties as a Priest, Phleger will leave the Catholic Church followed by his Black Parishioners and start his own reform Catholic Church.
Perhaps, Cardinal George is afraid that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will start a national boycott of the Catholic Church and not only encourage Black Americans to start a Black Catholic Church similar to the Polish National Catholic in Scranton.
Perhaps, Cardinal George is afraid that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are threatening Cardinal George with a possible demand for monies for reparations for whatever reason that only they might devise.
I don’t know if any of these hypothetical situations have any basis in fact but by Cardinal George’s inaction a reasonable person can only conclude that Cardinal George is using the theory that he may win a small battle with Phleger and loose many good people who might be effected by this situation.
Wow. I had read of his antics before, but never seen him in action.
“As a Baptist I feel that’s a bit of cheap shot.”
I’m sorry you feel that way.
“Any denomination can have a runaway kook in the pulpit.”
I agree.
“The test will be whether the Catholic leadership takes steps to deal with this.”
Lets not be holdin’ our collective breath.
“After what they went through with the child molesting scandel I would think they should be very quick to deal with a rogue Priest.”
Actually given that track record, I kind of doubt it.
The thing that gets me about the commentary on this situation is that every one seems to focus on the ‘pastors’ involved and the words they use.
No one seems to notice the reaction of those in the congregation. Those people are eating those words up. They are leaping to their feet, roaring their approval.
This says more about Obama than the words of those ‘pastors’. That congregation is as racist as they come. Otherwise they would not react as they do and they would not allow these ‘pastor’s to preach as they do.
Yet, I’m supposed to believe that, some how, Obama is unique in that he was the only member of that congregation that isn’t racist, that didn’t adhere to what is obviously the universal approval of the racist rhetoric spouted by these ‘pastors’?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.