To: Diana in Wisconsin
One of the jury members as much as said they didn’t convict her on the conspiracy arson charge because they felt sorry for her being a mother of a three year old and the mandatory sentence was 20 years.
Her going to trial paid off for her even though she was found guilty of lesser charges.
4 posted on
05/29/2008 9:12:21 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: jazusamo
“Evil” gets away with a helluva lot these days. *SIGH*
5 posted on
05/29/2008 9:14:08 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: jazusamo
One of the jury members as much as said they didnt convict her on the conspiracy arson charge because they felt sorry for her being a mother of a three year old... The researchers who could have been killed don't have kids? A mis-trial should be called.
To: jazusamo
"One of the jury members as much as said they didnt convict her on the conspiracy arson charge because they felt sorry for her being a mother of a three year old and the mandatory sentence was 20 years."
I seriously doubt this as it is prohibited to tell a jury the possible sentence a defendant faces if convicted of the charges for which they are being tried. Unless she looked it up herself, which is doubtful, she wouldn't have known at trial.
24 posted on
05/31/2008 9:56:03 AM PDT by
joebuck
(Finitum non capax infinitum!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson