Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diana in Wisconsin

One of the jury members as much as said they didn’t convict her on the conspiracy arson charge because they felt sorry for her being a mother of a three year old and the mandatory sentence was 20 years.

Her going to trial paid off for her even though she was found guilty of lesser charges.


4 posted on 05/29/2008 9:12:21 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

“Evil” gets away with a helluva lot these days. *SIGH*


5 posted on 05/29/2008 9:14:08 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
One of the jury members as much as said they didn’t convict her on the conspiracy arson charge because they felt sorry for her being a mother of a three year old...

The researchers who could have been killed don't have kids? A mis-trial should be called.

18 posted on 05/29/2008 4:21:50 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
"One of the jury members as much as said they didn’t convict her on the conspiracy arson charge because they felt sorry for her being a mother of a three year old and the mandatory sentence was 20 years."

I seriously doubt this as it is prohibited to tell a jury the possible sentence a defendant faces if convicted of the charges for which they are being tried. Unless she looked it up herself, which is doubtful, she wouldn't have known at trial.

24 posted on 05/31/2008 9:56:03 AM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson