Posted on 05/27/2008 5:01:09 PM PDT by freema
...newsroom managers talked about the realities of life in a rapidly changing media market, including smaller newsholes...
(Excerpt) Read more at ajr.org ...
There are some interesting statistics embedded in this editorial. A lot of horsepoop, too, but the interesting statistics are...how you say...interesting. Plus, I just couldn't resist posting about 'smaller newsholes'.
Piiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing.
The NYT seems to be as full of newsholes as ever.
I got really really tired trying to read the whole article. They all sited the same reasons. But NOT one that I could find
mentioned less soldiers dieing more cooperation between Iraq’s and less violence.
Changes for the better doesn’t make President Bush look bad.
SO NO good news here for lib’s plan. Move along everyone.
We’ve nearly won. You expect the MSM to cover that?
Not as many as this time last year, the old gray whore has had several lay-offs ... liberal bias doesn't sell that well anymore.
Lets see, the Dems want Iraq out of the news because there has been success and they look like fools. The Republicans want it out of the news because success may mean we do not need McCain to win the war.
Either way, things are better there if you remove the politics from it.
The troops were the real success story in Iraq.
You make an excellent point!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2021828/posts?page=1
Yep, the dems keep stepping in it alright!
Not sure about the McCain comment though. Since the Libs rule in the media I say it has 99% more reason on the stupid comments made by their beloved party.
It’s too bad you got too tired. I enjoyed ‘watching’ them stand in the town square and piddle all over themselves to explain it.
She was not known for moonbattery when she was Governor here. Maybe she hasn't got the memo?
Yeah, I enjoyed all of the positive coverage of their historic effort by the DBM on Memorial Day. /sarcasm
Ohhh I think you miss understood. I got tired of the article not watching the dems dribble all over themselves. HA
But it will be all forgot and replaced with high oil costs related exclusively to the Republicans, the “economy” and all the Republicans faults related. Or what ever else they can try to glue on them to help the anointed one to win.
Thunderingly correct, and totally lost in the search for nits in the bum hairs of the dolts who catagorically refuse to recognize a victory for our defenders as good for the country, much less their own asses, itching for a defeat that will not come.
They could have shortened that entire essay to a more truthful;
"Let no ink be spilt that may encourage our country and those who defend her"
What’s her plan for victory?
No, I didn’t misunderstand. If you had read it, you might know what it said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.