Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reeses
Up 60% since 2000 works out to 6% annual appreciation which is nothing great. The prices are not stopping here.

More like 7.5% and considering the house is heavily leveraged, it represents a great return on investment. Anyone getting 7.5% appreciation on their house is living there for free.

3 posted on 05/27/2008 8:52:48 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
More like 7.5%

What's your math on that? 6% for 8 years is 1.06^8 = 1.593, which is about a 60% gain. If you are highly leveraged and paying 6% on the money you borrowed then 6% appreciation isn't a gain.

6 posted on 05/27/2008 9:04:59 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

No, it is 6.0% Do the math. 60/8=7.5. That doesn’t account for ammortization. That is just a straight average ration. Start with $100,000. Compound that 6.0% annually and you get $159,000.

6.0% is correct.

By the time all is said and done, the numbers will work out to 4-5% because house prices over the long term never goes up faster than inflation. I’m willing to concede that inflatio may have been 5% since 2000, so that is a reasonable bottom for housing.

The problem is, after a bubble (and espacially a MASSIVE bubble like this last one), housing always dips below the mean in an over-reaction, before it comes back up to the mean. So at its worst, houing my dip down to a 3-4% annual rate of appreciation since 2000 before it stabilizes at 4-5%.


12 posted on 05/27/2008 10:17:14 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson