Did you read the article? She was not impaired, but some busybody thought she was. But I agree with you. EXECUTE HER IMMEDIATELY. If a malicious busybody thinks you're impaired, then you should be judged guilty. Far better ten innocent be punishd than one guilty go free, da komrad? Don't worry about evidence or reasonable doubt. J'accuse Mme Wilcutt du contre- sentiment révolutionnaire. The committee for public safety should send her to the guillotine immediately.
The businessman was showing that he is a good subject of the police state. Informing on your fellow citizens is a duty that we all should take seriously (as you apparently do)
Ancient Greece had a law on the books forbidding the export of figs. It was pretty much ignored and nobody really cared.
However an Athenian desiring to demonstrate his absurd loyalty to the City could therefore find some dastardly figshipper to inform on.
It was understood from the nature of the crime, that the informant was not doing this from a sense of outrage at the crime, but to demonstrate loyalty to the State.
Hence from the Greek words for "figs: and "to reveal", we get the word "Sycophant" (True story)