Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale; blam

Wouldn’t the P and S Shadow zones actually determine the spherical angle transmittable? Look at coordinates for the Chengdu big one(s) and the subsequent 6.x in Iceland. (something like 100 around and 35 up)
I don’t have the math, data or knowledge to calculate it, but it seems like any next quake could fall on a line from the first quake point along the edge of the liquid core to the surface (twin circles)(as the S wave would go)and ‘generally’ across the earth center-solid core for the P wave. (so ~180+/- deg) And if the arriving power found a susceptibility there, a quake would be generated. Which could be smaller or maybe bigger depending on the situation there.


23 posted on 05/30/2008 10:56:21 PM PDT by GNARLY OLD DUDE (Sound right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: GNARLY OLD DUDE

USGS uses tensors and displays them graphically in their world chart. Also, I just discovered that if you click the world map at the pole it will display a hemispherical map and you can see a little easier how the earthquakes form lines along, I assume great circles rather than through the core. If the planet were a uniform sphere the patterns might be easier to develop. I attended Real Analysis class and Complex Analysis class with some of these competitive personnel, quite a challenge.


24 posted on 05/31/2008 8:37:21 AM PDT by RightWhale (We see the polygons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson