Replies

Several posts back, I asked for proof and indicated I preferred not to hear back from you until you could provide it.

I provided links to several good pages containing evidence on the evolution of the horse. Sorry you are unwilling to read it -- I have included a graphic (below) which may help.

As far as preferring not to hear back from me? I'll just bet you prefer not to hear from me because I post good solid evidence. And I'll keep on posting evidence. You can keep on pretending it doesn't exist, but you're just making yourself look pretty silly.

But, as if I had rung Pavlov’s bell, Coyoteman immediately claims to have provided evidence, among horses, a specific kind of animal. That is not macro, in other words bona fide, evolution. (A Minotaur skeleton? Hey, then you’d have something.)

I did provide the evidence. You hand waved it away.

Then I point that out and you call it a handwave.

Yup.

It is a kind of hand motion, actually.

Whatever.

It’s a thumbs down on your little game.

Whatever.

You have no proof of macroevolution. No major layers found of in-between fossils leading from non-legged animals to apes to humans. Zilch. Nada. Bupkis.

See the graphic below, and the links I provided. I have provided evidence, good solid science, while you have provided nothing but denial.

At long last, you prove nothing but your fervor for your assertions. Kind of like a religion, except minus the Bible.

Wrong, I have provided links to good evidence. And here is another good link:

Horse Evolution Over 55 Million Years

You seem typical of the science-deniers we are seeing a lot of lately. You can't handle science, or the evidence it provides, nor can you refute that evidence--so you just pretend it doesn't exist. Nice try, but that won't make it go away.

And now, the graphic I promised:

Another aspect I find amusing is that the only basis for claiming all those transitionals are "various horses" is that scientists--evolutionists--have determined that they belong in that line. But if you go back to the earliest one in your picture, we find "The famous 'dawn horse,' a small, doggish perissodactyl, with an arched back, short neck, omnivore teeth, and short snout. 4 toes in front and 3 behind."

Frankly, I doubt that anyone seeing one of these critters walk by today would recognize it as some kind of horse (remember that it's only as big as a dog):

Coyoteman,

I asked for proof. You give me an ARTIST'S RENDERING.

A PRO-EVOLUTION ARTIST'S RENDERING.

And you tender it as factual.

Let me repeat that.

You gave me an ARTIST'S RENDERING.

A PRO-EVOLUTION ARTIST'S RENDERING.

And you tendered it as factual.

This is what we call The Big Lie. I think you actually believe it.

In an earlier post, you disagreed about public funding being spent on such biased unproven propaganda as this. (Taxpayers, take note.)

At long last, Sir, have you no shame, no decency? Have you no scientific integrity? You call yourself a scientist but you are merely parroting talking points and posting airbrushed fantasies.

Again, you call yourself a scientist but you are merely parroting talking points and posting airbrushed fantasies. You are practicing social engineering, not science: manipulation of facts and minds, not testing of theories. A 'phisher' of men.

I have no time for fanciful parakeet dances. I want facts and you are proffering piffle, for you have nothing else to offer.

Good Day.

By the way, how about finding an opportunity to support the troops? Support the unmolested Pledge of Allegiance in schools. Support Lou Barletta's campaign. Get involved in something real.