[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

The existence of a bona fide skeletal remain does not prove its ‘evolutionary’ heritage or age. It provides a platform on which, however, tests can be made although DNA may be similar in very dissimilar creatures.

In the bigger picture, let the Theory be put to the test, if it proves true, many bona fide skeletal remains will be found, including transitionals, so no fear, right? Truth will out. Meanwhile teach both origin theories side-by-side, as theories. Be scientifically and intellectually rigorous, precise and honest.

Put the whole theory and your premises to the test. Don’t be, as you say, easy.

[ketsu]

The existence of a bona fide skeletal remain does not prove its ‘evolutionary’ heritage or age. It provides a platform on which, however, tests can be made although DNA may be similar in very dissimilar creatures.

In the bigger picture, let the Theory be put to the test, if it proves true, many bona fide skeletal remains will be found, including transitionals, so no fear, right? Truth will out. Meanwhile teach both origin theories side-by-side, as theories. Be scientifically and intellectually rigorous, precise and honest.

Put the whole theory and your premises to the test. Don’t be, as you say, easy.

Okay, let's put the shoe on the other foot. What "evidence" is there for the "other" origin theory. Remember for a hypothesis to be true it has to be falsifiable.

[Coyoteman]

Meanwhile teach both origin theories side-by-side, as theories. Be scientifically and intellectually rigorous, precise and honest.

If you want to be "scientifically and intellectually rigorous, precise and honest" consider the following:

• The theory of evolution is not an origin theory
• ID and creation "science" are not scientific theories, they are religious beliefs
• The two cannot be taught "theories side-by-side, as theories" because ID/creationism, as religious beliefs, are not equivalent to the theory of evolution