The existence of a bona fide skeletal remain does not prove its ‘evolutionary’ heritage or age. It provides a platform on which, however, tests can be made although DNA may be similar in very dissimilar creatures.Okay, let's put the shoe on the other foot. What "evidence" is there for the "other" origin theory. Remember for a hypothesis to be true it has to be falsifiable.In the bigger picture, let the Theory be put to the test, if it proves true, many bona fide skeletal remains will be found, including transitionals, so no fear, right? Truth will out. Meanwhile teach both origin theories side-by-side, as theories. Be scientifically and intellectually rigorous, precise and honest.
Put the whole theory and your premises to the test. Don’t be, as you say, easy.
Gravity is invisible, it’s a force yet verifiable and the theory is falsifiable. Religions are belief systems and not falsifiable, both Creationism and Evolution.
Want to earn your way out of being an atheist religion? Show me proof of macro, major verifiable evolution. Show me where it all came from...and where what it came from, came from.
You’re just parroting me and grasping at tiny anomalies as evidence. Those are arguments, not proof.
I have no time for you if you’re not sincere and honest and respectful.
I will be offline most of the day.