Posted on 05/24/2008 6:36:51 PM PDT by Delacon
An ambitious agricultural guest-worker plan died with a whimper and not a bang this week, as senators quietly dropped the proposal from an Iraq war spending bill.
With little ceremony and no debate, a quick parliamentary maneuver late Tuesday night killed California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein's guest-worker plan. The plan would have given temporary legal status to 1.35 million illegal immigrant farm workers, as well as their spouses and children.
"We knew it was an uphill battle, but we thought it was one worth fighting," Scott Gerber, Feinstein's press secretary, said Wednesday.
Still, the unexpected revival and equally abrupt demise of the guest-worker plan raise questions about the strategy and tactics employed by those who want to grant legal status to some illegal immigrants. Feinstein did not appear to secure any concessions nor gain new allies through her short-lived guest-worker maneuver.
"The American people have been clear they want us to restore the rule of law to our immigration system before legalization programs are considered," declared Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. "Stripping it was the right thing to do."
Sessions, like Feinstein, is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. They were on opposite sides during last year's Senate debate over a massive immigration bill that included an agricultural guest-worker package dubbed AgJOBS. That bill would have given legal status to 1.5 million farm workers, putting them on track to permanent residency and eventual U.S. citizenship.
The comprehensive immigration bill collapsed, prompting farmers and farm worker advocates to seek other ways of passing AgJOBS or something like it.
Last week, Feinstein added a slimmed-down agricultural guest-worker plan to the $194 billion emergency war-spending bill. The revised measure would have given 1.35 million farm workers temporary legal status for five years. Spouses and children, potentially numbering more than 1 million, also would have been covered.
“Hey! Senator Inofe was a major part of that defeat of amnesty, too.”
I didn’t mention his name because I can’t spell it. Neither can you. Kidding. Yes, I neglected to give Senator InHofe credit as well. Without Sens. Sessions, DeMint, Vitter, Inhofe, Chambliss, Barrasso, Dole, Isakson, and Coburn the fight would be lost.
Q. Will those visas for unskilled workers go to illegal aliens already here and do those visas come with a path to citizenship?
Geez, all they need is a little patience. What will bill look like that goes into effect in Feb., 2009?
Thanks to Juan McAmnesty.
Do you honestly think that if you substitute La Raza for Hispanic Caucus, it will affect the outcome? Or that you will confuse agribusiness or the landscape industry as to what is going on in Congress.
The Hispanic Caucus' intent was not about immigration reform, it was about retaliating. And they have done that.
The GOP's attempt to extend the H2B quota increase has been blocked. The question you should be asking is why the GOP hasn't tried to use a discharge petition to get that legislation out of committee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.