Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kitty Hawk prepares for final farewell
STARS & STRIPES ^ | May 25, 2008 | Allison Batdorff,

Posted on 05/24/2008 1:37:44 PM PDT by radar101

YOKOSUKA NAVAL BASE, Japan — The yen-only DyDo vending machines disappeared from the ship this week.

Petty Officer 3rd Class David Santiago is filling up on sushi.

Chief Petty Officer Elison Talabong is looking for someone to buy his car.

Such are the many preparations under way for the final farewell of the USS Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier, which leaves Japan for good this week.

After a decade in Yokosuka, the 47-year-old aircraft carrier will pull out amid parting festivities and farewells from U.S. and Japanese dignitaries Wednesday morning.

The crew of the Kitty Hawk’s Japanese sister ship, the JS Shirane, will cast off the U.S. carrier’s mooring lines for the final time. The Kitty Hawk’s crew, about 3,000 sailors, will "man the rails" and stand in a formation that spells out "sayonara" in kanji characters on the carrier’s flight deck as it leaves.

And when it goes, the Kitty Hawk will leave a big empty space at its pier and a quieted Yokosuka Naval Base community — until the USS George Washington, Yokosuka’s next forward-deployed aircraft carrier, arrives in August.

But the George Washington isn’t on Chief Petty Officer Ace Elacio’s stress list yet. Only about 30 "GW" families have arrived, compared to the 2,000 Kitty Hawk families processing through Yokosuka’s Personal Property Office. His sayonara started in January with pack-outs of up to 100,000 pounds a day, he said.

"It’s been crazy for us," said Elacio, as office personnel extended hours through weekends and even set up shop aboard the ship. "We learned that we have to be flexible."

For another 900 Kitty Hawk sailors, life won’t change much. Sailors like Petty Officer 2nd Class Rudy Liverpool will simply walk over to the George Washington when the two ships do a "hull swap" in Hawaii in June. They’ll continue their jobs on the new ship, eventually returning to Yokosuka.

"I love Japan — the culture, the fashion," Liverpool said. "I wanted to stay here."

Other sailors’ fates are still written in pencil, awaiting hard orders for their next duty stations. Some wait for approval to remain at Yokosuka beyond Kitty Hawk’s official homeport date change of July 15, due to a mistaken Navy message that originally gave people until January 2009 before moving the date up to July.

"The transition is not easy, but we’ve worked extremely hard to ensure that the process is as easy on everyone as we could make it," said Kitty Hawk commanding officer Capt. Todd Zecchin.

The carrier is even trying to help sailors sell their Japanese vehicles to the incoming George Washington crew, said ship spokesman Chief Petty Officer Jason Chudy.

"We have a list of everyone’s cars, motorcycles and bicycles, and we are pushing hard to make sure every one is either sold or junked," Chudy said. "We do not want our lasting memory to be a bunch of abandoned cars."

New ship on the horizon While there is excitement in waving goodbye to the Kitty Hawk, there’s also flutter surrounding its replacement — the USS George Washington, the first nuclear-propelled ship forward-deployed to Japan.

Accommodating the new carrier required dredging the harbor to handle its deeper draft, and a new power plant is slated to come online to electrify the ship in port. Also, a new waterfront workspace is in place for the 600 Puget Sound Naval Shipyard workers who will make pilgrimages from Bremerton, Wash., to maintain the George Washington’s nuclear propulsion system.

While the Kitty Hawk’s departure will be nostalgic, the George Washington signals a move forward, U.S. Forces Japan commander Air Force Lt. Gen. Edward Rice said last week.

"As strong as the Kitty Hawk has been for the alliance, we are bringing in a capability that’s even stronger, looking toward the next 10 to 20 years," Rice said. "We are going to replace it with an even more capable ship that I’m confident will be, at the end of the day, warmly welcomed by all members of the alliance, and will find a strong home here at Yokosuka."

Sailor Tommy Creaturo, a chief petty officer who will cross decks to the George Washington, called the new ship an upgrade.

"It’s like going from a Pinto to a Cadillac," Creaturo said. Pausing a moment, he rethought the comparison. "Maybe more like going from a Model T to a Cadillac."

In the community, safety concerns about the ship’s nuclear power plant prompted two Yokosuka-based referendum attempts in the past two years. Although citizens’ groups gathered the required number of signatures, the Yokosuka City Council defeated the measure before it could go to a vote of the people.

Even though she has safety concerns, one 48-year-old Yokosuka woman called the carrier’s arrival "inevitable" due to the financial implications.

Kimie Noji, a 76-year-old liquor store owner, took a fatalist view indicative of a woman who has spent her life in a Navy town.

"Ships come and go," Noji said.

Goodbye, for now But Kitty Hawk still has many nautical miles to go before she sleeps.

After the "hull swap" in Hawaii, the carrier will steam to its former homeport of San Diego for a welcome-home party, then to Puget Sound Naval Shipyard to await decommissioning.

Although the decommissioning date has been set by instruction at Jan. 31, it is largely dependent on when the Navy’s newest carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, is ready for commissioning due to an 11-carrier mandate set by Congress.

Former Petty Officer 1st Class Camilo Martinez said he will attend the decommissioning when the Kitty Hawk gets to her final resting place.

"In the Bible book of Ecclesiastes we read, ‘For everything there is an appointed time … a time for birth and a time to die....’ " Martinez said in an e-mail. "Thus, even though the Hawk, in recent pictures, looks as awesome and majestic as when I first saw her, it is time for her to go."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: navair; usn; usskittyhawk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2008 1:37:45 PM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

2 posted on 05/24/2008 1:39:41 PM PDT by magslinger (cranky right-winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
IWO JIMA behind Kitty Hawk
3 posted on 05/24/2008 1:47:43 PM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Wow...was visiting on the USS Kitty Hawk in the 80’s...family day cruise...what a great day for me and my kids...had a blast.


4 posted on 05/24/2008 1:48:29 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

That old oil burner scoots.


5 posted on 05/24/2008 1:57:26 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=62182&archive=true


Saturday, May 24, 2008
House considers putting Kennedy, Kitty Hawk back into service in five years


By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Friday, May 16, 2008


WASHINGTON — House officials want to explore the possibility of bringing the USS John F. Kennedy or USS Kitty Hawk back into service in five years to keep the Navy’s carrier fleet at full force.

During debate on their draft of next year’s defense budget authorization, the House Armed Services Committee approved an amendment to study the cost and logistics of reactivating the carriers after their decommissioning over the next few years.

At issue is the Navy’s request to drop below the congressionally mandated 11-carrier fleet in 2012, when the USS Enterprise is taken out of service.

It will be replaced by USS Gerald R. Ford, the newest carrier from the class of the same name, but Navy officials have said it won’t be commissioned until 2015 at the earliest.

House officials were even more pessimistic, saying construction delays could leave the Navy with only 10 carriers for up to four years. But for now they’ve rejected the Navy’s request to continue temporarily one carrier short, instead asking for the study.

The committee rejected the idea of extending the USS Enterprise past fiscal 2013, noting the high costs of maintenance and limited nuclear fuel life of the ship. Both the Kennedy, retired two years ago, and the Kitty Hawk, scheduled to be retired next year, are conventionally powered carriers.

Naval officials said annual maintenance on the Kennedy cost more than $120 million before it was decommissioned. The study would also look at the availability of dry docks to repair and maintain the ships if they are reactivated.

Anthony Cordesman, an analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the study is an important tool for defense planners, if only because it draws more attention to the long-term planning challenges the Navy will face in coming years.

"You can’t really look at this from carriers alone. It has to be where they’re deployed, how it affects the air wings, what that means," he said. "It has to become a total force study, not just a carrier study."

House officials asked for the study to be completed early next year. Senate officials would have to approve the House language before the study could be begun.

© 2007 Stars and Stripes. All Rights Reserved.







6 posted on 05/24/2008 1:59:45 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I was the ship’s rescue swimmer on my ship and spent many an hour in the wake of the Kitty Hawk during plane guard. She was a beautiful ship, but smelled like all the other carriers, which is to say she stunk.


7 posted on 05/24/2008 2:10:58 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator

For that reason I have heard this great ship referred to as the “SH#TTY HAWK”.


8 posted on 05/24/2008 2:15:54 PM PDT by elcid1970 (My cartridges are dipped in pig grease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: radar101

WOW! What a photo!

THANKS!


9 posted on 05/24/2008 2:19:08 PM PDT by Zman516 (socialists & muslims -- satan's useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator
"She was a beautiful ship, but smelled like all the other carriers, which is to say she stunk."

I've never been on a Navy ship before. When you say the ship "stunk", exactly what did it smell like? Was it jet fuel or jet exhaust or just too many "people odors"? Do all Navy ships have bad smells to?

10 posted on 05/24/2008 2:26:32 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I remember the Kitty Hawk at North Island 28 years ago.


11 posted on 05/24/2008 2:31:29 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101


USS Kitty Hawk CV-63 arrives Hong Kong Harbor Nov 24, 2005


12 posted on 05/24/2008 2:45:35 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Peregrine, patron saint of cancer patients, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I’m sorry to hear the battle to name the new carrier USS America was lost in favor of USS Gerald R. Ford. Will CVN-79 be the USS William J. Clinton?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Gerald_R._Ford_(CVN-78)


13 posted on 05/24/2008 3:02:08 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

All the bird farms (carriers) have a certain stench to them. Jet fuel, diesel stink, vents from CHT holding tanks (human waste), and the cooking smells conspire to create an unforgettable odor.

The carrier that really sticks in my mind was the French carrier, if I remember correctly, Clemenceau. Went aboard it as a teenager. PEEEEEEUUUUUUUWWWWWWW! Only after visiting France did I realize that it was a tradition.


14 posted on 05/24/2008 3:30:23 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
“I've never been on a Navy ship before. When you say the ship “stunk”, exactly what did it smell like? Was it jet fuel or jet exhaust or just too many “people odors”? Do all Navy ships have bad smells to?”

I served aboard a destroyer and a carrier (later Nimitz class).

Every step you take is a different smell. Not so much human odor. It's more industrial. you smell different fuels, fluids, food, paint, oil, grease, chemicals, and a lot of things I never identified.

A ship, especially a carrier, truly is a city crammed into a city block.

That was 18 years ago. If I went back tomorrow (and from time to time I have dreams they called me back) I'm sure it would be all too familiar.

15 posted on 05/24/2008 3:40:59 PM PDT by ryan71 (Typical bitter white gun toter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator; All

Having spent time on a bunch of different ships, some ships are REALLY BAD such as the USS Lexington, which nearly asphyxiated me one night, and I could taste naval distillate for days after I left the ship.

That said, if you blindfolded and earplugged me and then placed me on a ship, I would be able to tell you unequivocally that I was on a ship.

It brings back to me immediate memories from 30 years ago. Immediate and vivid, the way jet exhaust does when I am at an airport.

The smell is a not unpleasant combination of oil, paint, solvents, cooking oils, canvas, exhaust, and so on. It is distinctive and on all ships...:)

Anyone who has spent time on ships can tell you that.


16 posted on 05/24/2008 3:57:25 PM PDT by rlmorel (Clinging bitterly to Guns and God in Massachusetts...:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I just went on the USS Midway in San Diego the day before yesterday, and...as I said, all the memories came flooding back due to the smell. I went on the rustbucket Soviet sub they have nearby, and it still has a distinctive smell that is similar in some way to every other ship.


17 posted on 05/24/2008 4:00:14 PM PDT by rlmorel (Clinging bitterly to Guns and God in Massachusetts...:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Heh, I think the crew referred to it as the S*itty Hawk for much the same reason the crew on the Kennedy when I was on it referred to it as “The Big John”, the word “John” referring obliquely (or not so obliquely) to a toilet.

Every sailor at some time or another has a love-hate relationship with a vessel. Especially if you are on it, and wish you weren’t...:)


18 posted on 05/24/2008 4:03:26 PM PDT by rlmorel (Clinging bitterly to Guns and God in Massachusetts...:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OCC

It EFFING better not be.


19 posted on 05/24/2008 4:04:09 PM PDT by rlmorel (Clinging bitterly to Guns and God in Massachusetts...:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Years ago I had a co-worker who was a crew member on a nuclear submarine in 1963. He said his most onerous duty was that of “s**thouse mouse” (submarines have waste disposal systems which require constant attention).


20 posted on 05/24/2008 4:11:40 PM PDT by elcid1970 (My cartridges are dipped in pig grease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson