Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

INCONVENIENT TRUTHS ABOUT OIL
Townhall.com ^ | 05/23/08 | Tom Glennon

Posted on 05/23/2008 8:39:48 PM PDT by oldscouter

At the time of the 1972 OPEC oil embargo, the domestic production of crude oil in America peaked at about 10 million barrels per day. This domestic production accounted for almost 2/3’s of our total needs, resulting in about 1/3 of our needed crude to be imported. The chilling effect of the embargo on our economy, and ability to provide for the national defense, resulted in our political leadership pledging that the government would work to allow America to achieve energy independence in 10 years. What have we achieved so far?

(Excerpt) Read more at oldscout.blogtownhall.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crude; energy; energypolicy; gas; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 05/23/2008 8:39:49 PM PDT by oldscouter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: oldscouter

bookmark


2 posted on 05/23/2008 8:42:48 PM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter

later


3 posted on 05/23/2008 8:47:57 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Liberals learning curves are pretty flat,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter

shale development is a little problematic. If you mine it, you’re talking about strip mining most of western Colorado, and there’s the question with what to do with all the waste rock. Then there’s the question of where to get the water for processing, in what is essentially a desert. There are some new methods for extracting the oil in place, but they’re still in the testing stage.

What killed shale development was not the government, but the eighties oil crash. After sinking so much money into shale, only to have it become economically unfeasible overnight, the oil companies have been reluctant to invest in it again.


4 posted on 05/23/2008 8:48:06 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter
bupkis
5 posted on 05/23/2008 8:48:10 PM PDT by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter
... pledging that the government would work to allow America to achieve energy independence in 10 years...every time new resources such as ANWR are proposed for drilling in this country, libs in congress start yapping that it will take ten years to develop the recources and therefore we should do nothing - had we started thirty years ago, or even ten years ago, we'd be in much better shape now - the crisis mentality of the 'rats, who fail to take any long-term action, is criminal.....
6 posted on 05/23/2008 8:49:35 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter

The big difference between now and the ‘70s is that there is no shortage of oil or gasoline. Yes, prices are historically hight, but there’s no rationing, or gas shortages, or odd/even days to get gas. Keep the government out, and the free market will work.


7 posted on 05/23/2008 8:55:17 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Keep the government out, and the free market will work.


the government could have played a useful role in the eighties and nineties with a Manhattan Project for alternate energy when the private sector wasn’t going to do it because oil was cheap. If you don’t want the government directly involved, have them stimulate private research with prize money. We’d be a lot better off nowadays if we’d gotten serious about this stuff twenty years ago.


8 posted on 05/23/2008 9:01:19 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kms61
... a Manhattan Project for alternate energy ...

I've said it before and I'll say it again, the invocation of the Manhattan Project and the Apollo Program as prototypes for some kind of miraculous effort at extracation from this predicament are unfounded.

These programs represented profilgate EXPENDITURES of energy and resources for the achievement of focused goals. They were the very epitome of the "expense be damned" philosophy, and are "180 degrees out of phase" with the realities of the situation we are now faced with.

9 posted on 05/23/2008 9:17:27 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kms61
As a bit of an update, Shell has been buying water rights ahead of commercial development of its shale leases. At the moment testing is all their leases allow. Next will come the commercial leases. The current in place production testing in Colorado is called The Mahogany Research Project.
10 posted on 05/23/2008 9:40:20 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
every time new resources such as ANWR are proposed for drilling in this country, libs in congress start yapping that it will take ten years to develop the recources and therefore we should do nothing - had we started thirty years ago, or even ten years ago, we'd be in much better shape now

How right you are!

Idiots = CONgress

Idiots = CONgress

11 posted on 05/23/2008 9:48:53 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter

***What have we achieved so far?***

Bupkis


12 posted on 05/23/2008 10:02:27 PM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

It’s absolutely maddening


13 posted on 05/23/2008 10:04:54 PM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Meant to sdd this from Shell Oil page,
“On only a 30 x 40 foot testing area, Shell successfully recovered 1,700 barrels of high quality light oil plus associated gas from shallower, less-concentrated oil shale layers. Our research to date has demonstrated that our In situ Conversion Process (ICP) works technically on a small scale - what remains is to prove it can work commercially.”


14 posted on 05/23/2008 10:05:03 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter

RIGHT ON! Couldn’t be better stated.


15 posted on 05/23/2008 10:33:12 PM PDT by taxesareforever (We'll never forget Matt Maupin and his service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldscouter
It is the result of our own government, mainly through the ineptness of Congress.

This is a very good article. Worth bookmarking. But ineptness is an entirely inadequate and unbelievable explanation. The article reads like a trail of circumstantial evidence and the evidence points to deliberate sabotage. To believe that these things occurred without intent, that Senators, Congressmen, bureaucrats and Presidents didn't have access to this kind of information or don't possess an ounce of common sense is beyond credibility. The rational conclusion here is all too obvious to me.

16 posted on 05/23/2008 11:00:36 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kms61
I don't think the current technology used in extracting oil from shale involves strip mining. in situ extraction methods
17 posted on 05/23/2008 11:08:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Yes, a big 1700 barrels. And that’s from their most recent test in 2005. And their extraction process is enormously complex.


18 posted on 05/23/2008 11:15:00 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kms61

These GREENIES are IDIOTS...NOTHING we do will satisfy them so why try?!!! Drill ANWR, build nuclear and screw them.

NEW YORK—U.S. environmental advocates are nervous that record crude oil prices will lead to a boom in production of fossil fuels like motor fuel from coal, Canada’s tar sands, or shale in Colorado that would emit more planet-warming gases than conventional oil.

“High oil prices are a double-edged sword,” said Deron Lovaas, an automobile expert at green group the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Rising crude prices were once a no-brainer for U.S. greens; the steeper the price, the more likely car-pooling and public transportation would rise in the world’s largest oil consumer and eventually tame demand.

But it is no longer an easy reaction as global demand rises as cars and highways multiply in places like China and India while global reservoirs of quality crude oil that refiners prefer to process become harder to find and drill.

“Another potential downside is that we drop our vigilance in terms of understanding that we need to have enforceable federal programs when it comes to ... fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions,” said Frank O’Donnell, president of the nonprofit Clean Air Watch.


19 posted on 05/23/2008 11:24:11 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Extraction from deep water is enormously complex also. It took decades to make deep water extraction practical, it’ll take decades to make shale practical. We have to start somewhere. There is no panacea, hydrocarbons are still our future.


20 posted on 05/24/2008 12:14:50 AM PDT by theymakemesick (The war on drugs benefits government agencies, politicians and drug dealers, they don't want to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson