Sorry Dr. E. I could not finish watching that bit by Olberman. It was so over the top as to make me ill. Hillary's comment was nothing more than a Freudian slip. Olberman's comments, however, were vile and despicable and intentionally so.
To any objective viewer, Olberman's constant railing about the "assassination" was hypocritical to the point of being ludicrous. Hillary mentioned it once in passing. Olberman must have used the term a hundred times in less than a minute. I lost count before I had to shut it off.
A Freudian slip isn’t a good thing. That would imply that she subconciously wants to see Obama whacked. That would be disturbing if true.
The line of thought Hillary was using in talking about campaigns going into the summer exactly fits the example of Bobby Kennedy.
I see no secret message to go out and harm Obama.
One must have something unusual in a comment about assassination if their intent is to send a message. That was a normal, logical comment.
DrE, I love ya, but I not going there on this one. Besides, the Clinton’s never telegraphed an Arkancide before. Why start now? In fact, it would be stupid.
Your statement above proves you didn't fully read the posts and listen to the input of others before you went off half-cocked.
Hillary alluded to this same Kennedy assassination theme on three previous occasions. This does not happen in presidential campaigns by the candidate without the entire thought being vetted by surrogates and tested in simulated interviews.
You have nullified your comments in defense of Clinton on this thread.
HF