Posted on 05/23/2008 6:18:33 AM PDT by NoLibZone
Europeans can buy cars that run on natural gas from at least eight automakers, but despite large reserves of the relatively inexpensive fuel in the United States, the federal government and states, including Massachusetts, are backing pricier biofuels as a way to lessen dependence on imported oil.
(Excerpt) Read more at oilkills.org ...
Yes, and yes
I’m one of those. I’ve tried to overcome these thoughts but just can’t. I’ve always believed that if you take something without replacement nothing will replace what you took.
There was a company in Lansing MI that used LP in all their pickups. They tore one down after 300K miles and the engine was clean as a whistle. No corrosion with LP. Just a thought.
Honda offered (and may still offer) a Civic that runs on natural gas. There may be geographic restrictions on availability. It required a home unit called a “Phil” I think, that could be mounted on the wall of your garage and connected to your home gas line.
And a sentence fragment: Range and energy per unit of mass...
Check out these microturbines that have many uses...now being used in hybrid buses
http://www.youtube.com/Microturbine
They still offer it, the Civic GX, base retail price $24,500, with the “Phil” unit costing around $800.00 extra, plus installation.
If you really want to drive on nat gas you got to do these things first:
Build lots of nuke plants
Stop using nat gas for electricity and heating. Use nuke powered electricity for heating and lighting.
Then you can drive on nat gas without causing the price to double or triple.
Or we could demand the 35 trillion cubic feet North Slope natural gas reserve be developed.
The oil pipeline built in the 1970s to move crude from the frozen North Slope to tankers in the port in Valdez was supposed to be followed by a second pipeline to tap into the states other energy treasury a vast natural gas reserve.
Yet again and again, the project to carry natural gas through Canada to markets in the Lower 48 has been delayed. The stalemate leaves at least 35 trillion cubic feet of identified gas reserves trapped beneath the North Slope -- about 50 percent more than the United States uses in a year. It also deprives Alaskans of new construction jobs, extra state government revenue and growth in the savings account -- known as the Alaska Permanent Fund that will issue $845 dividend checks to every state resident on Oct. 12.
The lease holding oil companies have been stalling development for 30 years.
Some impatient Alaskans, including former Republican Gov. Wally Hickel, President Nixon's first secretary of the Interior Department, say that the state should take back the oil leases if necessary. "We've had gas sitting up there for 30 years," Hickel said. "And so what we have to do is say, 'Wait a minute, now you just can't do that forever.'"
http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1&contentId=58284
It ain't all the "envirowakco.marxist Branch Algorians"
In the 1990s I was stationed at Tinker AFB in OKC. We had the largest fleet on NG vehicles in the US (1,100+ vehicles). They sucked.
Bad in the cold, bad acceleration, stalling, really poor milage, dangerous to refuel because the stuff was under very high pressure and the hose could really hurt you if it wasn’t connected correctly.
They only reason the AF did not ditch the whole program is that as part of the agreememnt to test these vehicles, the whole fleet got free fuel. So for 5 years Tinker had almost no fuel cost, except for a few hunderd unleaded and diesel vehicles.
In 1999 (my last year there) the agreement was up for renewal and the fuel was going to cost us nearly what gas does, when I left they were cutting the fleet WAY back because it just didn’t make sense to pay so much for a bad fuel.
I know my in laws just paid close to $4 a gallon to fill their LP tank. LP burns good, and is good for air quality, but no advantage in cost. Many fork lifts use LP and operate indoors it burns so clean.
Farmers where I was raised used butane in their tractors and trucks back in the 60’s so it’s not a new idea. If you can provide your own storage it might be a useful alternative.
Sounds like you’re in favor of pliticians interfering in how the market allocates natural gas to support a pet theory? Am I right?
Actually I am in favor of the market working, but we do not have an open market right now. I would rather we open ALL our reserves to coal. gas , and oil exploration. The enviro wackos will stop that. If we do not act soon, we will have sold our future to our enemies and we all better start studying the Koran. The quickest way I see to significantly lower oil imports is the way I propose. Time is of the essence here, and using nat gas to reduce gasoline demand is the fastest way I see to making that happen. Ethanol is a joke, does nothing to reduce energy demand and probably uses as much energy as it creates.
Imagine a "Chevy Volt" that runs exclusively on Gaseous Fuels that are filled at home via this device:
Just think of it, a Series Hybrid that is off the "Refinery" backlog. Lots of Nuke-Plants would help as well.
Now, if we can only get the fartknockers in the Sierra Club, the House, and Senate to let us drill for the 100+ years supply we have here in the U.S....
I just read an article about micro turbines this morning. First I had heard of them. Here’s the article
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Capstone_Turbine_Corporation
My first thought when I read about them was to wonder if these could power an electric drive vehicle and what the cost would be. I have no earthly idea if it’s even feasible but I’m curious.
Yes it can, yes it was tried, and it maybe tried again, but I can’t talk about it.....
On the air assisted side of their injector, they could run the gaseous fuel through it for only one injector per engine. These guys have got one trick solution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.