But who is to do it, we have no paladin?
Posted on 05/22/2008 9:48:34 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Correct, the only top tier candidate of either party not to do so.
The GOP will be sorry they were booted come November. At this point, it’s almost like the GOP leadership needs to lose some major elections to kind of get it through their heads that they are headed the wrong direction, but I’m afraid all it would do is force them to move even further left in an attempt to grab more moderates.
Powers that be? Who would they be?
The other problem is that a candidate can win winner-take-all states with a mere plurality. McCain could take all the delegates in a state even though 65% of the voters voted for someone else.
State parties really need to think of going to a majority vote system.
Excellent analysis, but we have to do something about it. Call it Cultural Marxism or Marxist @ssholism. Maybe Marxist anusism? It’s still absurd nonsense, and the left has to be called on this politically correct BS!
Counterattack, repeat counterattack! I couldn’t resist paraphrasing your tagline.
I’m hard pressed to think of the ills in our society that can’t be traced to the left, with the exception of immigration for the sake of cheap labor.
...
But who is to do it, we have no paladin?
You got it nailed. The left owns kindergarten through college. Conservatives don't have a chance, the left owns the future. In 1971, July 1, this nation ratified Amendment XXVI to the Constitution of the USA, thereby giving the right to vote to eighteen year olds, rather than twenty-one year olds. I think that that amendment gave the political power in this country to the liberal left. They are realizing that power only now.
But who is to do it, we have no paladin?
Common sense needs no paladin. The Founding Fathers didn't think it was rain when King George III was hosing them. Political correctness is no less a tyranny. Obvious BS requires a "willing suspension of disbelief." Why should anyone take it?
I wish you were right but, alas, history teaches otherwise. The founding fathers? You mean the men that articulated the Declaration of Independence? The Federalist papers? The Constitution? The Bill of Rights? Good heavens, history has never collected a more resolute band of paladins than Providence placed in colonial America.
The poll numbers suggest that a majority of Americans will eagerly "suspend disbelief" in November just as they did in November 2006.
History also teaches that a paladin is indeed required. A charismatic figure such as Reagan, or Thatcher, or Churchill, is absolutely required to turn around the normal drift to the left represented by the Jimmy Carters and the Clement Atlees.
If the GOP ever desrved a thumpin', that was then. Don't let the polls now fool you. Take heart. Once more into the breach!
Most conservatives believe that Americans are naturally conservative, and that the American people can be trusted to scorn anti-conservative claptrap from the elites. This is naïve, shortsighted thinking. How can the right believe that Americans are naturally conservative when, over the last fifty years, Americans elected one explicit socialist (Lyndon Johnson) in a landslide, elected two barely disguised socialists under admittedly unusual circumstances (Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton), gave a third explicit socialist (Al Gore) a majority of popular votes, and came unbelievably close to giving the White House to a fourth explicit socialist in a time of war (John Kerry)?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2020623/posts
It's late. There were exceptional circumstances for Johnson, Carter and Clinton, and they were all awful presidents. Conservatives don't like to rock the boat. However, it's time to rock the boat.
There are been a few movies in the past few years. Raising Helen comes to mind. There was another one with Robin Williams not to long ago (a comedy).
I'm curious, however, why the author isn't heartened by the positive portrayal of Catholic clerics.
Bump
I can't say how hard my candidate, Mitt, worked to get the Cuban vote, either. He should have realized what a strong base they are for any Republican.
The Cuban community probably felt a strong affinity for McCain anyway: McCain suffered at the hands of godless communists, just like their brothers and sisters are under Castro. So it was probably an uphill battle for Romney anyway.
Just mho! :)
P.S. to my previous post: when I said every single Florida Cuban, I meant, of course, every Florida Cuban in Congress. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.