Have you ever read any of 'The Doorway Papers' by Arthur C. Custance? 'Noah's Three Sons' has some interesting information about the relative contributions of the various races through Shem, Ham and Japheth. The technology of the Hamitic peoples is especially interesting. Gift of knowledge there.
No I have not read 'The Doorway Papers'... You mention Noah, now why was Noah elected to be the person to take his family into the ark to be saved? Genesis 6:9 There had to have been more than just two people initially created to have what DNA demonstrates. And so the Bible does indeed describe two different days of creation.
There are two possibilities of how it is that we have more than one 'race' of peoples on this earth since the flood. Either these peoples were on the ark or that flood did NOT cover this entire earth. IF not one of these two scenarios then what we have is a 'quick' paced form of evolution over the past few thousand years. Nothing in the story of the flood indicates Noah and his son's suddenly changed ethnicity.
If you had, you would have encountered something called, 'The Technologies of the Hamitic People'. That was the direction I was trying to send you as it relates directly to the IQ argument. Now, you can google that, start reading and discuss or you can go off on a tangent.
"You mention Noah, now why was Noah elected to be the person to take his family into the ark to be saved? Genesis 6:9"
Why it was in the very verse you referenced. "This is the genealogy of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect in his generations."
Do you see it now?
"There had to have been more than just two people initially created to have what DNA demonstrates."
Nope. That's all based on initial estimates of low human mutation rates projected back into unobservable time. Human mutation rates are actually quite high. Almost, if not in, reproductive error-catastrophe.
"There are two possibilities of how it is that we have more than one 'race' of peoples on this earth since the flood. Either these peoples were on the ark or that flood did NOT cover this entire earth. IF not one of these two scenarios then what we have is a 'quick' paced form of evolution over the past few thousand years. Nothing in the story of the flood indicates Noah and his son's suddenly changed ethnicity."
Race, as you describe it above, is an evolutionary concept based on outward physical characteristics and assumptions of mutation rates again. In reality there is only one race, the human race. Now, if you want to switch definitions of race and argue from the other side, I understand.
That's one of the problems with believing in evolution. It is absolutely blinding to any other interpretation of reality.