If you had, you would have encountered something called, 'The Technologies of the Hamitic People'. That was the direction I was trying to send you as it relates directly to the IQ argument. Now, you can google that, start reading and discuss or you can go off on a tangent.
"You mention Noah, now why was Noah elected to be the person to take his family into the ark to be saved? Genesis 6:9"
Why it was in the very verse you referenced. "This is the genealogy of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect in his generations."
Do you see it now?
"There had to have been more than just two people initially created to have what DNA demonstrates."
Nope. That's all based on initial estimates of low human mutation rates projected back into unobservable time. Human mutation rates are actually quite high. Almost, if not in, reproductive error-catastrophe.
"There are two possibilities of how it is that we have more than one 'race' of peoples on this earth since the flood. Either these peoples were on the ark or that flood did NOT cover this entire earth. IF not one of these two scenarios then what we have is a 'quick' paced form of evolution over the past few thousand years. Nothing in the story of the flood indicates Noah and his son's suddenly changed ethnicity."
Race, as you describe it above, is an evolutionary concept based on outward physical characteristics and assumptions of mutation rates again. In reality there is only one race, the human race. Now, if you want to switch definitions of race and argue from the other side, I understand.
That's one of the problems with believing in evolution. It is absolutely blinding to any other interpretation of reality.
If you had, you would have encountered something called, 'The Technologies of the Hamitic People'. That was the direction I was trying to send you as it relates directly to the IQ argument. Now, you can google that, start reading and discuss or you can go off on a tangent.
One can find just about anything on google. Do you believe as I was taught that Hamitic People, Ham and his offspring were the family of 'black' peoples?
"You mention Noah, now why was Noah elected to be the person to take his family into the ark to be saved? Genesis 6:9"
Why it was in the very verse you referenced. "This is the genealogy of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect in his generations."
What does these words perfect in his generations mean if accurately translated from the Hebrew? Why did God repent that He made man in the flesh and why did He decide to destroy all but Noah and his family?
Do you see it now?
"There had to have been more than just two people initially created to have what DNA demonstrates."
Nope. That's all based on initial estimates of low human mutation rates projected back into unobservable time. Human mutation rates are actually quite high. Almost, if not in, reproductive error-catastrophe.
Let us use common sense... IF man in the flesh was formed/created just a mere 6 thousand years ago there would be NO difference in the appearances of humanity. Mutations could NOT occur quickly enough to have billions of Chinese or else we would have been told that a miracle gene of ethnicity had been placed into Adam and Eve. The Old Testament traces who begot whom right down to the birth of Christ and the Heavenly Father guarded that bloodline very closely.
Genesis 1 says Let US make man in OUR image and it was good... Then a couple of days later there is NO man to till the ground and then the description of the Adam is given. I did not write what Moses penned but DNA gives verification that it is literally NOT possible to have different ethnicities as result of either God cursed genes or the weather turned real hot or cold.
"There are two possibilities of how it is that we have more than one 'race' of peoples on this earth since the flood. Either these peoples were on the ark or that flood did NOT cover this entire earth. IF not one of these two scenarios then what we have is a 'quick' paced form of evolution over the past few thousand years. Nothing in the story of the flood indicates Noah and his son's suddenly changed ethnicity."
Race, as you describe it above, is an evolutionary concept based on outward physical characteristics and assumptions of mutation rates again. In reality there is only one race, the human race. Now, if you want to switch definitions of race and argue from the other side, I understand.
Race or ethnicity is result of the Heavenly Father's handiwork and He said His creation was good. Evolution with their art work alone demonstrated who they projected evolved upward. Now given the never ending bloodshed over whom is superior or lessor seems to me this would have been acknowledged in that instruction book, wherein Christ said I have foretold you all things.
That's one of the problems with believing in evolution. It is absolutely blinding to any other interpretation of reality.
I do not believe in evolution of any form to be causation or reason for the multiples of kinds of peoples to be found upon this earth. God says that all souls belong to Him... and He was not speaking of the flesh bodies that return to dust. Now this IQ business is little different than some of the other man made systems of organizing or grouping peoples for self serving purposes.