Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bartlett drops opposition to oil drilling in Arctic refuge
Baltimore Sun/AP ^ | May 22, 2008 | staff

Posted on 05/22/2008 12:13:35 PM PDT by saganite

Congressman Roscoe Bartlett says high oil prices have prompted him to drop his longtime opposition to oil and natural gas drilling in a national wildlife refuge in Alaska.

The Maryland Republican has co-sponsored a bill that would allow for oil and gas production on part of the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: 110th; anwr; congress; drilling; energy; environment; roscoebartlett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: saganite
. . . . eat his cake and have it too . . . .

It's nice to see this phrase expressed correctly.

81 posted on 05/22/2008 1:39:25 PM PDT by pilipo (I am officially a man without a country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
We ship a lot of oil off the Pacific Coast and replace it with oil brought in through the gulf because there are not enough refineries on the west coast.

Not true. The West Coast does not produce enough oil to supply the existing West Coast Refineries.

West Coast (PADD 5) Crude Oil Exports
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/mcrexp52m.htm

West Coast (PADD 5) Crude Oil Imports for Processing from All Countries
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/mcripp52m.htm


82 posted on 05/22/2008 1:40:24 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Great laugh bump!


83 posted on 05/22/2008 1:40:46 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Clearly, you are better informed than I.

I recalled that, back in the seventies, during the last "gasoline crisis", there were reports that a significant proportion of Alaskan production was going to Japan. That made some sense to me at the time...but, obviously, those reports were not factual.

My apologies for having muddied the issue.

84 posted on 05/22/2008 1:42:13 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Or we cut oil consumption by 4% and we can have the market impact of ANWR tomorrow.

How about doing both?

85 posted on 05/22/2008 1:43:19 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Or we cut oil consumption by 4% and we can have the market impact of ANWR tomorrow.

How about doing both?

86 posted on 05/22/2008 1:43:19 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

did you squint your eyes shut in self satisfaction while typing that?


87 posted on 05/22/2008 1:44:06 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Swell, Roscoe. But what do we do for the next 8-10 years until such oil reaches the consumer? Jackass!

Congressman Steve King says it will take considerably less time than that. We must get started. Stop talking and start drilling.

88 posted on 05/22/2008 1:45:15 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
I've seen drilling in Alaska. Except for the facility site, which is about a city block in size and pristine and clean as a surgery, there is little impact. That was years ago and we have improved since. The caribou and other wildlife thrive, drilling is ‘directional’ leaving the area environmentally untouched. Trucks use an ‘ice road’ to protect the fragile tundra, and when the ‘ice road’ melts, no more trucking. We love our environment and know how to do it right.
89 posted on 05/22/2008 1:47:21 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Live pure, speak true, right wrong and follow The King. (Tennyson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

??? I don’t understand.

57 states = 114 senators.

114 - 51 dem and 5 pubs should leave us with 58 votes.

Where did I mess up?


90 posted on 05/22/2008 1:48:13 PM PDT by pilipo (I am officially a man without a country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
That's cute.

As I said in an earlier reply, I have learned more on this thread alone about the pricing of oil, than I have learned in my almost 40 years of being on earth. Thanks to all for their great information.

That is why I love Free Republic! There is an expert out here for just about any subject. Now if you ever want to know about medical billing, ping me ;->

91 posted on 05/22/2008 1:49:00 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee

The way the polar bear decision is being initially viewed is that it won’t matter where you are, even Arizona say, since the theory is that CO2 is responsible for destroying the sea ice ( GW ) you could be challenged on the basis that you’re producing more CO2 and thus imperiling the polar bear. This decision is an economy wrecker.


92 posted on 05/22/2008 1:52:04 PM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: okie01
No, in the seventies, before we ever started producing North Slope oil, it was threatened that the oil would go to Japan, but that never happened because to get the pipeline approved, congress required that it could not be exported.

Since then, the myth continued and twisted. All people had to do was look at a map.

It is 3,577 miles from Valdez, Alaska to Tokyo, Japan.

It is 1,274 miles from Valdez, Alaska to Anacortes, Washington. (largest Washington refineries)

IT is 2,253 miles from Valdez, Alaska to El Segundo, California (major refinery near Los Angeles)

http://www.findlocalweather.com/forecast.php?forecast=pass&pass=distances&dpp=0&pands1x=Valdez%2C+AK&pands2x=El+Segundo%2C+California&Find+distance=How+far+is+it%3F

93 posted on 05/22/2008 1:52:57 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Isn’t that sweet. Who built that bike for you and transported it to the store you bought it at? If you were a true environmentalist you would walk to work. /s/


94 posted on 05/22/2008 1:53:58 PM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cousair

Maybe they meant Pres. Martin Sheen. Now that would really stir things up.


95 posted on 05/22/2008 1:55:44 PM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: saganite
A little late there, Congressman. If you'd have supported the idea awhile back, consumers might not be struggling with such high gas prices now.

You only have yourself and your fellow liberal nutcases to blame.

96 posted on 05/22/2008 1:56:54 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Or we cut oil consumption by 4% and we can have the market impact of ANWR tomorrow.

Oh golly, that means Al Gore will have to park his private jet, and the Kennedy's will have to put their yachts into storage.

97 posted on 05/22/2008 1:59:06 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ArmyTeach
Good points. I should have mentioned the ice roads (I know about them from living in Canada's far north). If the development uses ice roads and barges for it's bulk resupply; and a pipeline to take the oil out; there will be negligible environmental costs.
98 posted on 05/22/2008 2:05:23 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
” ... but a caller into a radio show today suggested that since 80% of the domestic oil we produce in the US is actually exported to other countries ....”

That would be a caller who never saw this site:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/info_glance/petroleum.html

Making policy on the basis of the opinions of uninformed talk-show callers is not a good idea.

99 posted on 05/22/2008 2:24:34 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Obviously, we should do do both.


100 posted on 05/22/2008 2:26:40 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson