What? Only two? Bias reigns.
So, what will the California marriage license look like in the new era of same-sex marriages? Will it list “Partner A” and “Partner B”? “Intended No. 1” and “Intended No. 2”? Or will it contain just blank spaces for the betrothed?
maybe “Rumprider 1” and “Rumprider 2”
They need more than two blocks, because there is nothing important about marriage meaning a “couple” any longer.
Partner C
Partner D
Notice the rush to set all these phony “marriages” in stone before the people can vote on a constitutional amendment to preserve the real thing.
Radical leftism is a one-way ratchet. Once these policies are put in force, they never reverse them. “Compromise” is just one gear on the ratchet. “Compassion” is another. Always grinding...
It’s far from settled so they better save the ink for now.
WHEN WILL THIS ALPHABETICIST OPPRESSION END?!!??
Welcome to the Brave New World.
I am not an attorney and I don’t play one on television and please correct me if I am wrong but these “marriage licenses” for homosexuals aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on until there is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution recognizing marriages between two individuals of the same sex.
Any constitutional lawyers out there?
No kidding ... even when they're tax forms that are due back before they get the forms to you in the first place.
Here's a scenario ... a homosexual couple "marries" using a form with "bride and groom" "man and woman" whited out whereever they occur, and "person 1, person 2" written in. A year later, the couple breaks up and files for divorce, but a judge rules they weren't ever married because the license had been adulterated and the carbons don't made the original. Property-settlement chaos ensues, and they end up on "Judge Judy" ...
What if Partner B is named “Fido?”
Surely they won’t discriminate against those who wish to marry their dogs, or perhaps their brother.
Well you can’t have Partner 1 and Partner 2, as that implies that Partner 2 is less than Partner 1. The same problem exists with Partner A and Partner B.
Years ago, Robert Fripp issued a “double album” with one album on each side of the vinyl disc. God Save the Queen/Under Heavy Manners (pure and applied Frippertronics) had a Side A and a Side 1. I think that resolves this problem.
Pitcher and catcher???
It would be up to the happy couple to decide who would be head or tail.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy.
I weep for whats left of our Country
My question is: the courts had better figure out which is the man and which is the woman, because in a divorce, they have to know who gets the house, kids, dog, car, and who gets to move out, pay alimony, pay the mortgage, continue the car payments, and get accused of abuse.
comrade top and comrade bottom.
It could refer to their favorite position-—sorry that’s awful!!
Dear Abby:
Today I accidentally called my partner B, partner A. Now my partner B wants me always to call my partner B, partner A. Well, I’m partner A. If knew I would someday be partner B I would never had married. It used to be bride and groom but being an enlightened progressive liberal I thought best my partner B and I use partner A and partner B to affirm our gender neutral beliefs. But now my partner B wants to be partner A and refuses to talk to me unless I call my partner B, partner A. I’m so mad and confused. Help!
Signed
Stupid in California
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus