Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Tells 75,000 Oregonians Iran is "not a threat" to US
American Thinker ^ | May 19, 2008 | Rick Moran

Posted on 05/19/2008 10:34:28 AM PDT by vietvet67

Note to Obama: Your mask is slipping.

Barack Obama has tried his best to conceal the fact that underneath all the soothing rhetoric about "change" and being a new kind of politican, he is nothing but a 1960's style liberal with some incredibly naive views about American foreign policy.

Yesterday in front of 75,000 adoring fans, Obama really let his inner liberal take over and made one of the most outrageously stupid comment of the campaign to date. If the GOP were smart, they would take this comment and run it from now until November.

Jennifer Rubin at Commentary:

This remarkable bit of footage from Barack Obama's appearance in Oregon last night is now floating around on YouTube. It might be useful as an undergraduate course exam: how many errors can you spot? Obama apparently believes that Iran and other rogues states (he lists Iran, Cuba and Venezuela) "don't pose a serious threat to the U.S." Iran, specifically, he tells us spends so little on defense relative to us that if Iran "tried to pose a serious threat to us they wouldn't . . . they wouldn't stand a chance."

So, taken literally, he seems not much concerned about Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, its sponsorship of terrorist organizations, its commitment to eradicate Israel, its current actions in supplying weapons that have killed hundreds of Americans in Iraq, and its role in eroding Lebanon's sovereignty through its client Hezbollah.

Echoes of the '60's to be sure. At that time, even the Soviets weren''t considered a threat because they would never start a war due to their losing 20 million in World War II. Of course, it is never brought up that the Soviets were perfectly willing to assist Hitler in starting the war by making a secret pact with the Nazi dictator that carved up Poland and deliniated spheres of influence for the two powers.

And we know now that the period from 1983-85, Soviet leaders were actively contemplating a first strike against the United States before our conventional military build up was complete. So it should come as no surprise that Obama - a man whose associations with 1960's radicals is documented and who has immersed himself in liberal dogma his entire adult life - should come out and say something so ridiculous that it is going to cost him considerably at the polls.

How many more gaffes like this does the candidate have in him? Let's hope there are several between now and the election.

Ed Lasky adds:

Going beyond Jennifer Rubin's valuable comments about Barack Obam's benign view of Iran, why are we just hearing these views said so explicitly now? Could it be that Barack Obama, on the cusp of securing the Democratic Party nomination, no longer has to cover his true views?

Furthermore, there has been a spate of articles the last week speculating that he feels secure in being able to capture enough of the Jewish vote (whcih is not necessarily pro-Israel) in key states that he feels he can dismiss concerns about Iran and Israel. How does that relate to his early supporters who all but shilled for him regarding his "love for Israel", the steadfastness of his support for the nation? Will he be as dismissive towards them going forward as he has been towards Israel?

He seems all but ready to ignore the entire region-including regional allies-whose views towards America may be less than perfect but whose cooperation going forward will depend on their feelings that America will be alert to the threat posed by Iran and form in resisting, if not rolling back, Iranian imperialism run amok. Beyond these concerns, his naivete is remarkable. Pollyanish attitudes are perilous for a President to have; Hope is not a foreign policy. It is a Hallmark Card sentiment and a campaign slogan.

Rich Baehr agrees that "this is exactly what is going on- he has won,and is now basking in the love of his partisans on the left, who have won control of the Democratic Party."

If so, it will be interesting to see how the press plays this dramatic shift leftward.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: iran; iraniannukes; obama; or2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: vietvet67
Iran, specifically, he tells us spends so little on defense relative to us that if Iran "tried to pose a serious threat to us they wouldn't . . . they wouldn't stand a chance."

Did he really say that? If so, that would qualify as one of the most monumentally stupid statements of all time. How much did Al Quaeda spend on 'defense' relative to the amount that the US spends? What a totally irrelevant threat metric in the age of asymmetric warfare, with the very real prospect of death-worshipping barbarian cult members gaining control of doomsday weapons.

Does Obama believe that:

Hint: I'd bet that the latter is the closest to his true beliefs...

21 posted on 05/19/2008 11:11:05 AM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Obama is the lunatic Mullahs’ strongest asset in the world today.

He could be the enabler of our destrution (an Iranian nuke in New York City).

Obama is the greatest threat in this nation’s history, in my opinion.


22 posted on 05/19/2008 11:14:48 AM PDT by LowTaxesEqualProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said a “full array of tactics are on the table” in efforts to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Speaking at a news conference at Israel's parliament during a four-day Congressional visit to Israel, she also listed diplomatic and economic options as important components.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018150/posts

They have created a monster.

23 posted on 05/19/2008 11:15:21 AM PDT by angelsonmyside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician

All it takes is one Iranian nuke in New York.

They don’t need to spend what we are on defense.


24 posted on 05/19/2008 11:17:03 AM PDT by LowTaxesEqualProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew5qP2oPdtQ
25 posted on 05/19/2008 11:37:34 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Emotions trumps everything for these folks.............

“I feel your pain”!


26 posted on 05/19/2008 11:48:36 AM PDT by Grateful One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity

Iran, specifically, he tells us spends so little on defense relative to us that if Iran “tried to pose a serious threat to us they wouldn’t . . . they wouldn’t stand a chance.”

Friends of Israel take note. This is the sound of Jews being thrown under the bus.


27 posted on 05/19/2008 11:56:21 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Obama now saying: “Let me be absolutely clear: Iran is a grave threat.”

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080519/D90OS7100.html

Which is it Obamaman?


28 posted on 05/19/2008 12:01:41 PM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

((PING)) for later research.


29 posted on 05/19/2008 12:14:52 PM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

DumbObama
30 posted on 05/19/2008 12:17:59 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

I’ll give him credit for being honest in his views.

They obviously have no fear of McCain, or Republicans overall, and are now looking to make the election into a powerful, liberal sweep of government. Conservatives are a waning power in their view, as are moderate libs.

They know that the real power will be in claiming a “mandate” on top of a stronger congressional majority.
They then can remake the state and the tax system with impunity.


31 posted on 05/19/2008 12:37:13 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex Pete
Photobucket

32 posted on 05/19/2008 1:48:45 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician

Awesome video:

The same kind of terrorists who support Obama did this:
http://www.frugalsites.net/911/attack/
Never apologize for them.
Never appease them.
Never forget.


33 posted on 05/19/2008 2:20:02 PM PDT by cyberella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander
The new "dead heads"?

The new Meat Heads.

34 posted on 05/19/2008 6:49:32 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson