Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

He is saying that those like Larry Flynt (yes thats right the Hustler founder) doesnt need farm subsidies to pad his pocket book for his big corp farm.

Try Ted Turner and all that ranch land he owns in Montana who gets kickbacks as a result.

That is corporate welfare plain and simple.


8 posted on 05/19/2008 9:46:48 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: crz

Farm subsidies are available to single family farms as well as corporate farms. This is not corporate welfare.

These subsidies are paid out to prevent over production. Over production causes prices to drop through the floor, destroying the ability for farmers to make a profit, and causing damage to the food supply.

I have mixed thoughts on these subsidies. I know some folks think corporations shouldn’t get the payments. It’s my take that if you exclude corporations, you destroy the program.

Right now we’re experiencing some shortages related to bio-fuels. This would seem to indicate that less not more subsidies are called for. I would favor an adjustment downward.

I understand where folks are coming from, when it comes to subsidies. I am not convinced that if they were totally eliminated, it would be a positive thing. It could turn out to be a devistatingly bad thing.


9 posted on 05/19/2008 10:02:34 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (If you continue to hold your nose and vote, and always win, your nation will be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson