throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that gets hit yelps...
Posted on 05/18/2008 12:03:08 PM PDT by kingattax
“How to Enrage a Democrat”
Steal their tofu and chardonnay????
Appeasement, appeasement, appeasement!
I hope that was said enough to top make “someone’s” head explode.
In 1938, Germany was ruled by a madman who wanted to conquer the world and kill all the Jews. The European powers tried appeasement, and we all know the result.
Now, in 2008, Iran is ruled by a madman who wants to conquer the world and kill all the Jews. The European powers, this time with the support of American liberals, want to try appeasement. The difference today is that this madman is attempting to aquire nuclear weapons.
Those who will not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that gets hit yelps...
“how to enrage a democrat.”
quote from the bible?
So, you're one of those under votes we've heard so much about?
A short video every American should view.
http://www.frugalsites.net/911/attack/
Keep drilling.
“how to enrage a democrat.”
Read the Constitution????
Republicans believe in rules. By the rules, McCain won. End of story.
This a known problem way up front and it was why I was pulling my hair out before Iowa telling people they were falling for a trap voting for Huckster, that Huckster would lead inevitably to mcCain as the nominee. It was clear as day to us.... and yet too many people didnt like Romney. Water under the bridge.
Now unless you are a pschiatrist and can certify McCain, he’s our nominee.
They just need to go onto the Daily Kos and ask for one.
:-P
“how to enrage a democrat?”
“read the constitution???”
it’s like garlic for a vampire.
Democrats HATE it when you expose them for what they are ... that is why they hated swiftboating, it nailed Kerry for the pompous medal-seeking two-faced elitist that he was.
A few talking point rebuttals to keep in mind:
1) OBAMA IS THE WORST NOMINEE EVER
National Journal ranked Obama the MOST LIBERAL Senator in 2007. Obama is to the LEFT of Dukakis, Gore and Kerry. And has fewer accomplishments and expereince compared with all three.
Obama is the weakest, most leftist, and least accomplished nominee that a party has put forth in many many years. he is the least deserving to win of any nominee in a long long time.
2) REBUTTAL TO DEMOCRAT ANTI-BUSH BASHING
“Democratic bullshit didn’t cost 4000+ lives and 650 billion dollars, or make the entire West much more dangerous and less free for everyone.”
LOL. 5 or 6 Democrat BS talking points in a single sentence. Surely no Republican can outrun that amount of BS.
Democrat BS like Carter’s foreign policy and Clinton’s ‘wall’ of separation that kept us clueless about AQ’s intentions madethings more dangerous. Deposing two of the worst govts in the worlds - the Taliban and Saddam Hussein’s regime - have been beneficial to long-term peace and stability.
USA has spent $2.7 trillion in past year, or about $12 *trillion* in the past 5 years, so the cost of liberating Iraq from Saddam and making it a democratic nation free from Al Qaeda is not more than 5% of the Federal Govts expenses. We hear nary a peep from the leftists about the waste, boondoggles etc. from that other 95%. This is all about the desperate and failed attempts to (a) lose a war that is on its way to being won and (b) gain power through fear and demonization, which takes us back to the point of that article.
Attacking Bush over his response to 9/11, which was overall a far better response than previous administration reactions to earlier terrorist attacks, is nothing more than meaningless political posturing.
As for Iraq, Bush is blamed for a war where no WMDs were found, and yet prior to the war, Democrats from hillary Clinton to John kerry were insisting along with everyone else that they were there. So much for Bush keeping Clinton’s CIA chief - a ‘slam dunk’ mistake. And Saddam’s intent to develop WMDs was there. It’s a typical 20/20 hindsight call. Yet it is the Democrats who want to lose the war unnecessarily now, evading completing plain facts such as - Al Qaeda has been in Iraq fighting, and that is where the war on terror is being waged, like it or not.
“When Bush was given the news of the events of 9/11, he looked like a rabbit caught in the headlights.” On the contrary, the President was on top of the situation, gave a national address that evening and an historic speech 9 days later, and within days of 9/11 the genesis of the response, to take out the Taliban, took shape. Within 75 days, the taliban was out of power. You may want to get educated instead of sipping Michael Moore’s swill.
“and then unleashing the might of the US military on a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 - “
The Taliban in Afghanistan had allowed Al Qaeda training camps. they had everything to do with 9/11, that is why Bush took them out. Saddam was a sponsor of terrorism for 2 decades with friendly contacts with AQ, so the ‘nothing to do with 9/11’ is simplistic talking points, not the whole story.
“It is quite likely that the aftermath of that is going to make it impossible for me to live the life I’ve been living.”
What silliness ... are you an AQ terrorist? War on Terror cramping your style?
“In fact, it’s already started; how much has oil gone up?”
The price of oil is up. The price of DRAMs and cellphones is down. American productivity is up. Unemployment is around 5%. Life is good in USA, so long as you dont have an 80 mile commute in an old cadillac or screwed up by buying zero down in Cali at the height of the housing bubble. Apparently only the facts that just happen to be on the DNC approved Bash-Bush-talking-point list seem to be of interest to you. I feel sorry for you and other lost souls who live on that planet where Bush screwed everything up, and do hope you all someday have a safe ride back to planet earth where things are much better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.