Posted on 05/17/2008 7:42:28 PM PDT by Richard Poe
| by Richard Lawrence Poe Saturday, May 17, 2008 |
Archives Permanent Link |
HILLARY CAN still win the Democratic nomination, provided the superdelegates vote for her. I think they will. Over 60 percent are men, and men cannot resist Hillary.
Granted, Hillary is no spring chicken. Her fleshly allure has diminished over time. But Hillary has other ways of bending men to her will.
Consider her effect upon journalist David Brock. A ruthless political dirt-digger for the right, Brock nearly toppled the Clinton White House. His Troopergate story in the American Spectator triggered the Paula Jones lawsuit, leading to Bill Clinton's impeachment. Yet, when Brock trained his sights on Hillary, he suddenly went soft.
In 1994, the Free Press awarded Brock a million-dollar advance to write a Hillary exposé. Brock slowly fell under Hillary's spell, as he wrote. In Brock's words, he began to "sympathize with the trials and tribulations she faced, and even to see a kind of beauty" in her soul. "In finding Hillary Clinton’s humanity, I was beginning to find my own", he later wrote.
Released in October 1996, The Seduction of Hillary Rodham turned out to be a whitewash, portraying Hillary as an idealist saddled with an unworthy husband.
Brock didn't stop there. He publicly renounced conservatism in the July 1997 Esquire. Then he wrote a book smearing his former conservative friends and colleagues as crooks, liars, drunkards, dopers, philanderers, closet homosexuals and "right-wing fag hags", in Brock's memorable phrase.
Hillary knows how to return a favor. In 2003, she set up her own personal think tank, the Center for American Progress, with $3 million from Wall Street billionaire George Soros. One of the Center's first priorities was to give David Brock a job.
Hillary's Center helped launch Media Matters for America, an activist group dedicated to fighting conservative influence in the media. Brock was put in charge of it. Hillary's former enemy had become her lapdog. Such is the power of Hillary's charm.
Hillary worked a similar transformation on Richard Mellon Scaife. During the 1990s, the Pittsburgh philanthropist and newspaper publisher spent millions trying to expose Clinton wrongdoing through lawsuits and grants to journalists. Time magazine dubbed Scaife "king of the Clinton haters".
Those days are over. Following a March 25 meeting this year with Senator Clinton, Scaife wrote in his newspaper, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, that the meeting had "changed my mind about her".
In an April 20 editorial, Scaife's Tribune-Review endorsed Hillary for president.
Hillary's most impressive conquest to date is Rupert Murdoch, whose $60-billion media empire encompasses Fox News and the New York Post. When Hillary ran for reelection to the Senate in 2006, Murdoch stunned New Yorkers by endorsing her, even holding a Hillary fundraiser at his headquarters in Manhattan.
Fox News has become Hillary's favorite network. Her campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe praised Fox in a May 13 interview on Fox & Friends. McAuliffe complained that "90 percent" of mainstream media favored Obama. By contrast, he noted gratefully, "Fox has been one of the most responsible in this presidential campaign".
What is Hillary's secret? By what alchemy does she transform bitter enemies into loyal operatives? Cynics might argue that Hillary employs methods more forceful than her winning personality.
They might note, for instance, that the last Clinton administration sicced the Federal Communications Commission on Murdoch, nearly putting his Fox Network out of business. At age 77, Murdoch may no longer have the stomach for that sort of fight.
Dick Scaife likewise felt the Clintons' wrath. From 1993 to 1997, he gave $1.8 million to the American Spectator to fund investigative reportage on the Clintons. Such grants are perfectly legal, yet the Clinton Justice Department subjected Scaife and the American Spectator to a 14-month criminal investigation. No prosecutions resulted, but Clinton critics felt the chill.
The American Spectator had already suffered years of harassment, including several suspicious break-ins. Founder and editor-in-chief Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. later wrote, "The pressure was enormous. [David] Brock was the earliest to crack under the strain."
Plainly, Hillary's enemies-turned-friends have other possible motives for switching sides than mere puppy-dog infatuation. In fact, they have every reason to fear Mrs. Clinton. Staying on her good side may be a matter of simple survival for them.
This brings us back to the superdelegates. Most are leaning toward Obama, at this point. But convention rules allow them to change their minds right up till the end.
However she managed it, Hillary did get Rupert Murdoch and Richard Mellon Scaife to join her team. Persuading the superdelegates seems a small task by comparison.
|
Richard Lawrence Poe is a contributing editor to Newsmax, an award-winning journalist and a New York Times bestselling author. His latest book is The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Sixties Radicals Siezed Control of the Democratic Party, co-written with David Horowitz. |
Yes, it is satire. But satire with a point.
They might note, for instance, that the last Clinton administration sicced the Federal Communications Commission on Murdoch, nearly putting his Fox Network out of business. At age 77, Murdoch may no longer have the stomach for that sort of fight.
Very possible.
The above analysis suggests that Hillary Clinton is very adept at playing the margins and on her own terms. While reading it, Livia (Claudius' grandmother) kept ringing through my mind. The ruthlessness by which Livia's beliefs and willingness and adeptness in employing ANY means by which to see Rome going as she thought it should - is best explained, IMHO by this passage at Wiki:
With time, however, and widowhood, a haughtiness and an overt craving for power and the outward trappings of status came increasingly to the fore. Livia had always been a principal beneficiary of the climate of adulation that Augustus had done so much to create, and which Tiberius despised ("a strong contempt for honours",)..."
The culture of "adulation" is strong in this current age.
Again, from Wiki:
Becoming more than the "beautiful woman" she is described as in ancient texts, Livia serves as a public image for the idealization of Roman feminine qualities, a motherly figure, and eventually a goddess like representation that alludes to her virtue. Livia's power in symbolizing the renewal of the Republic with the female virtues Pietas and Concordia in public displays had a dramatic effect on the visual representation of future imperial women as ideal, honorable mothers and wives of Rome. [4]"
Yes, I think Mr. Poe's analysis of "why" best serves to explain.
Freedom's just another word for "nothin' left to lose."
-- Janis Joplin
.
"All the men I know want to sleep with her. All the women want to scratch her eyes out."
One has to consider the source of this quote - Anne Reingold, media director of the Democratic National Committee.
Most the men and women Anne Reingold knows, are most likely Democrats.
So, Democrat women want to scratch Hillary's eyes out, and Democrat men want to sleep with Hillary.
Sounds like Democrat party members are living in pure hell with each other.
I'm not a Democrat. I've never wished to scratch her eyes out and no man I know, including Democrat men, wish to sleep with her.
So, obviously, this "thing" about Hillary exists for those who strive for power, and sex is to them a power thing.
Question: Would Democrat males rape her if they thought they could get away with it? Would Democrat females slash her if they thought they could get away with it?
NARAL and gender feminists have endorsed Obama. Maybe this is whom Reingold knows, and is supplying the quote about.
I've seen few known feminists supporting Hillary's campaign.
The Democrat males I've seen endorsing and supporting Hillary? Are all in position of Democrat power, currently. Governors, mayors....
So it is quite possible Reingolde is correct in so far as she is discussing the people she knows -- Democrats.
But contrariwise, this suggests Hillary IS a gender feminists given her "talents" for wanting to scratch the eyes out of conservatives, and wanting to sleep with them or screw them.
In which case, I have no problems understanding Scaife and Murdoch saying simply: no thanks, I'll step right out of your way.
Now I understand Hillary's recent "brushing up against" Rush, better.
That song was actually written by Kris Kristofferson
Yet, when Brock trained his sights on Hillary, he suddenly went soft.
There’s a world of comments to be spun from that remark. I’d better pass or be kicked off FR.
Hillary Raises Assassination Issue (Defends long-running campaign)
nypost.com | May 23, 2008
Posted on 05/23/2008 12:33:21 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2020379/posts
also pertinent:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2019945/posts?page=94#94
Fox News has become Hillary's favorite network. Her campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe praised Fox in a May 13 interview on Fox & Friends. McAuliffe complained that "90 percent" of mainstream media favored Obama. By contrast, he noted gratefully, "Fox has been one of the most responsible in this presidential campaign"... the last Clinton administration sicced the Federal Communications Commission on Murdoch, nearly putting his Fox Network out of business. At age 77, Murdoch may no longer have the stomach for that sort of fight.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.